IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [v6ops] LISP support for draft-ietf-v6ops-rfc7084-bis-00

JORDI PALET MARTINEZ <jordi.palet@consulintel.es> Wed, 12 April 2017 15:27 UTC

Return-Path: <prvs=127550c264=jordi.palet@consulintel.es>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 06B01129C47 for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 12 Apr 2017 08:27:21 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=consulintel.es; domainkeys=pass (1024-bit key) header.from=jordi.palet@consulintel.es header.d=consulintel.es
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id TRkbsxtTGTPr for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 12 Apr 2017 08:27:19 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.consulintel.es (mail.consulintel.es [217.126.185.215]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BEECD129C68 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Wed, 12 Apr 2017 08:27:16 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple; d=consulintel.es; s=MDaemon; t=1492010833; x=1492615633; q=dns/txt; h=DomainKey-Signature: Received:User-Agent:Date:Subject:From:To:CC:Message-ID: Thread-Topic:References:In-Reply-To:Mime-version:Content-type: Content-transfer-encoding:Reply-To; bh=60Z2dT7DN+kI/ffvlloiYbyHV rjBqjNs2N8te5YJwv0=; b=XtBqWY2I12KidFpUnI+4mNvSwlC66JrJma+Jnmxp7 2Hvp6p65a9M+/AdrEt3quvAZQ/cpGcwxrPbmNQ6O/nMniccEaIbvj2IQSM7tPrjj L3COnXKLHYWb/OUAxD1qaXfYxO86+JablcSmvhd9iLwQqo//5rW7943bBiw3hGzj mU=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; s=MDaemon; d=consulintel.es; c=simple; q=dns; h=from:message-id; b=PajZVwGzlnHcwhawMKYnvTLGL44ETva5nJ66xuOUhAz9G7REOmZIXLR5kff8 rY87yuwJH00tKdroK8h3tOP6Y8hCy+pJvdJaafetadB+f09xfSJJeVlyk ZTYDRR46+ShNLGTcn/4jTtbTwv3Z3JP9CVUzfnZFVhyRjiyEquXdGg=;
X-MDAV-Processed: mail.consulintel.es, Wed, 12 Apr 2017 17:27:13 +0200
X-Spam-Processed: mail.consulintel.es, Wed, 12 Apr 2017 17:27:13 +0200
Received: from [10.10.10.99] by mail.consulintel.es (MDaemon PRO v11.0.3) with ESMTP id md50005407222.msg for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Wed, 12 Apr 2017 17:27:13 +0200
X-MDOP-RefID: re=0.000,fgs=0 (_st=1 _vt=0 _iwf=0)
X-Authenticated-Sender: jordi.palet@consulintel.es
X-HashCash: 1:20:170412:md50005407222::SETUdOn8kuR/YIpB:0000KPmH
X-Return-Path: prvs=127550c264=jordi.palet@consulintel.es
X-Envelope-From: jordi.palet@consulintel.es
X-MDaemon-Deliver-To: v6ops@ietf.org
User-Agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/f.21.0.170409
Date: Wed, 12 Apr 2017 17:27:09 +0200
From: JORDI PALET MARTINEZ <jordi.palet@consulintel.es>
To: otroan@employees.org, Ca By <cb.list6@gmail.com>
CC: v6ops@ietf.org
Message-ID: <B6EB6786-4ED8-4E81-B67C-C5CB4E49159C@consulintel.es>
Thread-Topic: [v6ops] LISP support for draft-ietf-v6ops-rfc7084-bis-00
References: <D8F5C737-B01A-4EC8-9175-C4921C0CD69F@consulintel.es> <392D675B-73C4-40D3-81A8-A06907F5581D@employees.org> <3BBFC922-85BD-49B5-B39E-227F191BD48C@consulintel.es> <729244A1-E7AB-4BA0-8B39-A6122D2C32DB@employees.org> <CAD6AjGQyatWEOxCpnOn8H+SxG=BWM=cBPaXoON6vA7dj7TNqOQ@mail.gmail.com> <C0C91DE8-215F-4C49-9DAF-42267B29A6D9@employees.org>
In-Reply-To: <C0C91DE8-215F-4C49-9DAF-42267B29A6D9@employees.org>
Mime-version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-transfer-encoding: quoted-printable
Reply-To: jordi.palet@consulintel.es
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/v6ops/qaz25n7covpmPrrJzIfNf6DHY-Y>
Subject: Re: [v6ops] LISP support for draft-ietf-v6ops-rfc7084-bis-00
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/v6ops/>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 12 Apr 2017 15:27:21 -0000

Hi Ole,

> I think map-t may have had some recent deployment at Jio, but it is not clear to me how much they have used map-t vs DS ... or their v6 numbers in mobile vs landline.
    
    Given that none of these mechanisms are interoperable. And that it is difficult to build an ISP provisioning system that can deal with an arbitrary CPE, and that it is hard to build a CPE that can deal with an ISP offering an arbitrary mechanism. The conclusion really has to be the same as Barbara has for the IPv6 over IPV6 mechanisms... and it follows that there is nothing to gain by adding a list of these mechanisms in a 7084bis document.

[Jordi] I don’t agree. Several service providers have said so in the list. Some of them are big ones (I recall DT), other smaller and medium ones.

Regards,
Jordi




**********************************************
IPv4 is over
Are you ready for the new Internet ?
http://www.consulintel.es
The IPv6 Company

This electronic message contains information which may be privileged or confidential. The information is intended to be for the use of the individual(s) named above. If you are not the intended recipient be aware that any disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of this information, including attached files, is prohibited.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email