Re: [v6ops] LISP support for draft-ietf-v6ops-rfc7084-bis-00

Speaking as a participant.

I would suggest that any requirements found in the document be *required* by at least one commercial network, preferably several. Vendors and enthusiasts like to stuff requirements documents with their favorite features, and in the products they make they can certainly include them. But for everyone else, and for the networks that don't use them, they are simply cost and a source of bugs.

On Apr 11, 2017, at 8:11 AM, JORDI PALET MARTINEZ <jordi.palet@consulintel.es> wrote:
> Hi all,
> 
> I got a comment about including support for LISP in order to allow IPv4 access with an IPv6-only-WAN.
> 
> Even if I’ve got a couple of links of providers that actually use it, I believe is not something that is happening in the market, and seems to be tied to a specific vendor.
> 
> I’m not personally fan of including that support in the document, however I will like to heard some more opinions on that from the WG.
> 
> I plan to publish a new version (-01) in 1-2 days, maximum, so I will like to heard opinions about that, and in general for the actual version of the document.
> 
> Regards,
> Jordi
> 
> 
> 
> 
> **********************************************
> IPv4 is over
> Are you ready for the new Internet ?
> http://www.consulintel.es
> The IPv6 Company
> 
> This electronic message contains information which may be privileged or confidential. The information is intended to be for the use of the individual(s) named above. If you are not the intended recipient be aware that any disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of this information, including attached files, is prohibited.
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> v6ops mailing list
> v6ops@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops