IETF Logo Mail Archive

[v6ops] LISP support for draft-ietf-v6ops-rfc7084-bis-00

JORDI PALET MARTINEZ <jordi.palet@consulintel.es> Tue, 11 April 2017 15:11 UTC

Return-Path: <prvs=1274da9a4c=jordi.palet@consulintel.es>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0E45512EA6A for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 11 Apr 2017 08:11:45 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.999
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=consulintel.es; domainkeys=pass (1024-bit key) header.from=jordi.palet@consulintel.es header.d=consulintel.es
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id pBK8fkWzqdqC for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 11 Apr 2017 08:11:43 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.consulintel.es (mail.consulintel.es [217.126.185.215]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 96C45129C6F for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Tue, 11 Apr 2017 08:11:43 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple; d=consulintel.es; s=MDaemon; t=1491923502; x=1492528302; q=dns/txt; h=DomainKey-Signature: Received:User-Agent:Date:Subject:From:To:Message-ID:Thread-Topic: Mime-version:Content-type:Content-transfer-encoding:Reply-To; bh=ea0U7PlVJCTWxAjNo9CA+Zqhyk7JahmQ8D/fV7O81Qk=; b=khaSCs9DI/ESH SS+369xKeSywArSSqRE3IJf6AR8zjElF7Jwo+Enub5Mixj7KbFMmluPdeKQItn8Y pEVMqeyy1E43PjYRDqpG7dG56KhyblyScvz85u8AUc+7Imx4CvbOpF6gxwxhgCNt Say7nZvFfZb0WASuHThD1mmTdqtSY8=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; s=MDaemon; d=consulintel.es; c=simple; q=dns; h=from:message-id; b=EbSPGtPcYC374eZQHH9Ett4HtbP+EliULfmONuM01DFjWqrbTGQkHSnOlftw sfbhI3zkJ4Q8JWgIlvYvt8JDXNfPE/2V4a87moCAOY/Vje/l7p44lPhRJ bwW1vFQA4y3VRbgz+UCirHHz17iEi0vYC8wUQqZUfAyEPe/AWwxPmg=;
X-MDAV-Processed: mail.consulintel.es, Tue, 11 Apr 2017 17:11:42 +0200
X-Spam-Processed: mail.consulintel.es, Tue, 11 Apr 2017 17:11:41 +0200
Received: from [10.10.10.99] by mail.consulintel.es (MDaemon PRO v11.0.3) with ESMTP id md50005406320.msg for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Tue, 11 Apr 2017 17:11:41 +0200
X-MDOP-RefID: re=0.000,fgs=0 (_st=1 _vt=0 _iwf=0)
X-Authenticated-Sender: jordi.palet@consulintel.es
X-HashCash: 1:20:170411:md50005406320::34tIEZuspYT/QBdd:00003eD8
X-Return-Path: prvs=1274da9a4c=jordi.palet@consulintel.es
X-Envelope-From: jordi.palet@consulintel.es
X-MDaemon-Deliver-To: v6ops@ietf.org
User-Agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/f.20.0.170309
Date: Tue, 11 Apr 2017 17:11:39 +0200
From: JORDI PALET MARTINEZ <jordi.palet@consulintel.es>
To: v6ops@ietf.org
Message-ID: <D8F5C737-B01A-4EC8-9175-C4921C0CD69F@consulintel.es>
Thread-Topic: LISP support for draft-ietf-v6ops-rfc7084-bis-00
Mime-version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-transfer-encoding: quoted-printable
Reply-To: jordi.palet@consulintel.es
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/v6ops/fv4I4aT3AI2yvaL1bYW1y_a_8_4>
Subject: [v6ops] LISP support for draft-ietf-v6ops-rfc7084-bis-00
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/v6ops/>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 11 Apr 2017 15:11:45 -0000

Hi all,

I got a comment about including support for LISP in order to allow IPv4 access with an IPv6-only-WAN.

Even if I’ve got a couple of links of providers that actually use it, I believe is not something that is happening in the market, and seems to be tied to a specific vendor.

I’m not personally fan of including that support in the document, however I will like to heard some more opinions on that from the WG.

I plan to publish a new version (-01) in 1-2 days, maximum, so I will like to heard opinions about that, and in general for the actual version of the document.

Regards,
Jordi
 



**********************************************
IPv4 is over
Are you ready for the new Internet ?
http://www.consulintel.es
The IPv6 Company

This electronic message contains information which may be privileged or confidential. The information is intended to be for the use of the individual(s) named above. If you are not the intended recipient be aware that any disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of this information, including attached files, is prohibited.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email