Re: [v6ops] FYI: Microsoft's latest on CLAT

Jen Linkova <furry13@gmail.com> Fri, 08 March 2024 12:39 UTC

Return-Path: <furry13@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C9718C14F614 for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 8 Mar 2024 04:39:18 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.856
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.856 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT=0.25, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id kNJZhhcFfZl6 for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 8 Mar 2024 04:39:15 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-lj1-x22a.google.com (mail-lj1-x22a.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::22a]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 05AF1C14F5F9 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Fri, 8 Mar 2024 04:39:15 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-lj1-x22a.google.com with SMTP id 38308e7fff4ca-2d208be133bso9648501fa.2 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Fri, 08 Mar 2024 04:39:14 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20230601; t=1709901553; x=1710506353; darn=ietf.org; h=content-transfer-encoding:cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from :in-reply-to:references:mime-version:from:to:cc:subject:date :message-id:reply-to; bh=vPWtWhfyWFQ2RaozU2aixKt/5zG/s3Xb+AvNjWrVsvg=; b=bdRrvAOen1DblbeP3Oqaw6AFiK/iK2rbWa/fzzUkyA3xH2ySs1+UPLXr/EcKHdQQXY K8tjUmz73VG0RFFyP2PcLkPrFTxvzK7mDDahAs/zlKOMhMxN/4ZYFBNPwVzB5J9BDnVY PKbNulfvsEVB/kVd35LHFkjU8ABwHa62NOsOL9MkwO1FcLFy7oKBsrkfMZqeeOLLzOXu Sr12446vl0gu3uO6yLM9xi3V+Bgu62bAhb60RTTjm9auEPJ11Y8DpmO6eEDzkxgXXsre 6T7q73b+pcNWwENrwAjWcQY0XM1XZt/hu72UP8IQYuvjKq0SNmcxLwj1L8GRG8ucDbl9 2drg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1709901553; x=1710506353; h=content-transfer-encoding:cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from :in-reply-to:references:mime-version:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc :subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=vPWtWhfyWFQ2RaozU2aixKt/5zG/s3Xb+AvNjWrVsvg=; b=dXIQBSgTacwyGt83aaTXbqVXD+lDDjhtiIsEooQHUlkeYap0jHtUoblzGHahIrHnNO 0NgvdnGhl6VVGAN7VAY0uItTMyoSR26rs68BxH06lWKfmKUbwYKagAdG/JuvqUv1FFIl MSgAVA1mHU5GQRru+1Zm2x2RuPcxajhaXrd9D5ggTmsGoAb/7IYwfO9MLYvEScyc1C+Y epmO+tfPgP4fJhZ+mqP2ZEBIog8KW/CAUcr2p7LKCYsfuxtge9I2cz6PRBv1ceMOPAzc dbQlUbo1Y8zq82iO5om4N3x7y37oKzEUrUMKGoe3zon1Q1UvQVI7+HsJnyPqcUweT540 TCJg==
X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=1; AJvYcCWq4pvtVWazaGuR4CtBfNT0mteMvFgEHhJap1+H5euku579lqPP6pO7ATIsd/lv8Y8O0xIkRbe2JMWgZxeChQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0Yz7Q4tJQ4ltxlCASXYwLiKezWeOJLAwgauldQSBB+1YZ+l1crQ0 AVU94aiIxBvPsJKqiHIze2Xn1/OhKM5Bs8zGyLm9Ij+x/bqTSOfykz6ttMqbGn2ta1DVDqB5gt/ wCBrr3kgg3VYmg/q/Db7HIloatW0lHgKP
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IEoveNfN4tbXvhkRt2e6IF02OlFZxJMgPx8rUyCZjkfF8ANt+EDI6QZ/mNZobQTO4Meh/rCiYGyWsf4ic1kGWU=
X-Received: by 2002:a2e:9603:0:b0:2d2:ab6a:e694 with SMTP id v3-20020a2e9603000000b002d2ab6ae694mr3288045ljh.7.1709901552788; Fri, 08 Mar 2024 04:39:12 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <SJ0PR00MB1348781EB81293E8A0521F23FA202@SJ0PR00MB1348.namprd00.prod.outlook.com> <CAKD1Yr1GgOBR+Y5x4-+BCzQFp3usPwd_CM05nfwgM6pT5wef1Q@mail.gmail.com> <884F5E11-364C-4D42-B199-B8FEF33C59C4@employees.org>
In-Reply-To: <884F5E11-364C-4D42-B199-B8FEF33C59C4@employees.org>
From: Jen Linkova <furry13@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 08 Mar 2024 23:39:00 +1100
Message-ID: <CAFU7BAQn-EgpL0mukUUnsBt916UA0P9Qw8KYtC5E5vG3ZMOW7w@mail.gmail.com>
To: Ole Troan <otroan=40employees.org@dmarc.ietf.org>
Cc: Lorenzo Colitti <lorenzo=40google.com@dmarc.ietf.org>, Tommy Jensen <Jensen.Thomas=40microsoft.com@dmarc.ietf.org>, "v6ops@ietf.org" <v6ops@ietf.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/v6ops/ObCZoiGbeJdR8aRR-0h_QUUEQCw>
Subject: Re: [v6ops] FYI: Microsoft's latest on CLAT
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/v6ops/>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 08 Mar 2024 12:39:18 -0000

On Fri, Mar 8, 2024 at 10:15 PM Ole Troan
<otroan=40employees.org@dmarc.ietf.org> wrote:
> I’m also a fan of IPv6-mostly.
> Isn’t it too early to state that it has lower operational cost than dual-stack (or IPv4 only)?

It may be for people who haven't deployed it yet.

> What I mostly(sic) like about it, is that it provides a clearer path towards IPv6 only than dual stack.
>
> But I would imagine at least for the short term there are going to be quite a few operational wrinkles to sort out.

When you find a new technology which doesn't have that problem, please
let me know ;)

>It’s likely harder to troubleshoot IPv4 problems too.

It's not my experience. Actually troubleshooting is much easier.
For IPv6-only devices it's just one protocol. For dual-stack devices
nothing has changed compared to a dual-stack setup.

>And I don’t think it even works on my DHCPv6 single address assigned network at all (yet to be tested).

Nor would IPv6-only.
When you made the decision to assign a single IPv6 address per device,
I assume you did evaluate pros and cons.
It doesn't make the  designs which are incompatible with your choice bad ones.

>
> > On 8 Mar 2024, at 04:52, Lorenzo Colitti <lorenzo=40google.com@dmarc.ietf.org> wrote:
> >
> > Great to hear! I think this means that all the major platforms will support the "IPv6-mostly" operational model that v6ops has been working on for the past few years. That's super important, because it means that any network can use this model with confidence that all their clients will work.
> >
> > Hopefully this will really help adoption of this model in enterprise networks. Dual-stack is expensive to operate, but if IPv6-only works, then any enterprise that wants to support IPv6 in some form can simply skip directly from IPv4-only to IPv6-mostly without having to worry about the costs of dual-stack at all.
> >
> > On Fri, Mar 8, 2024 at 5:05 AM Tommy Jensen <Jensen.Thomas=40microsoft.com@dmarc.ietf.org> wrote:
> > Good day v6ops,
> >
> > As a general IPv6 FYI, I'll share Windows' announcement to bring CLAT to general networking interfaces which went live today: https://techcommunity.microsoft.com/t5/networking-blog/windows-11-plans-to-expand-clat-support/ba-p/4078173
> >
> > Looking forward to seeing everyone in Brisbane and talking about CLAT recommendations, the draft Jen and I are coauthoring, as Windows will be an implementor!
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Tommy
> > _______________________________________________
> > v6ops mailing list
> > v6ops@ietf.org
> > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops
> > _______________________________________________
> > v6ops mailing list
> > v6ops@ietf.org
> > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> v6ops mailing list
> v6ops@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops



-- 
Cheers, Jen Linkova