IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [v6ops] FYI: Microsoft's latest on CLAT

Lorenzo Colitti <lorenzo@google.com> Sat, 09 March 2024 00:47 UTC

Return-Path: <lorenzo@google.com>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 778E7C14F697 for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 8 Mar 2024 16:47:28 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -17.609
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-17.609 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_MED=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, ENV_AND_HDR_SPF_MATCH=-0.5, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5, USER_IN_DEF_SPF_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=google.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id MpqovMyHNYLj for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 8 Mar 2024 16:47:28 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-ed1-x52a.google.com (mail-ed1-x52a.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::52a]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1380CC14F684 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Fri, 8 Mar 2024 16:47:27 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-ed1-x52a.google.com with SMTP id 4fb4d7f45d1cf-5683247fd0fso1397925a12.3 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Fri, 08 Mar 2024 16:47:27 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20230601; t=1709945246; x=1710550046; darn=ietf.org; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=B5wQo16EmKCNlZqOJ7065Uqk4rVsnSa2k4Ky+qAg/Wc=; b=r9ryqeoFqL1L0VJnim06hV79UJLK4RIpX59PFnviB89DgWDjRtlCIwBzrr93mG2qF9 9tZ+Ms0JNUaUAp7XAw51py1UOz0I2uxyuD4PA8sHH8QXcHffzJnCKZyWwdsCIo3ny7mv WhkX/b/AzQ759WxmlxO3NtfCL9uI1ngox88mfZ68lxOIR2M1/ynzHQDCefpHQLcWIX/v GAHzJahOVS47E23AxPSqhMDflEeNBJEcLiPFv4l/XmUvzU3zwco2yIoaCnd8NY2ZLnZb UlThwjyTveNhl3EL8TT8WYyPc70/ZVtgzaKWyEYGdMlWdIZ1ChGlghLnBS7L1WP1tlp0 oeNw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1709945246; x=1710550046; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id :reply-to; bh=B5wQo16EmKCNlZqOJ7065Uqk4rVsnSa2k4Ky+qAg/Wc=; b=jdR7JlggPXXUWuXKEsEXdWPVzKM3wm+JMqlcLWFO2luKh+H5U6fW+p69QuHHL8lhtt rMnqLvxYXhodEcWcvU7xB83mLDBNYxy4x0qe7Cnd1QsyuJFPA5H9/+101blv0bs2+AM3 X/yWkxwZ9jqXOBNMrvqPDsvWzMFHCcVikzlboXfffyhZdqfctPZiBjrbia77DdhYSj48 n/HZeVQb9atUJMa7u5I0yXC5TUrD2TwHS4x3hIYwlB+7+YQG6LrOFlhcgBbwvjTDc3/e D1ABO+3dc+k9N1OEOq1HG19W2FtHiDyUnkWzjzIEwJw+wSb/Ioe2OnQoLaP7j+KPSSgW 0GAQ==
X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=1; AJvYcCWHnwKE+LcPAlPIcsL8nVkxf+NmzVNoCXr4T6WOvtvJBBajTkUulfLKW6FRsfebyOR0muK4IJAMBqPAO1IGsA==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0Yx902Dj2hYlwabr/E/tUfTLcXXXW83DCvXMHOxvwfB15PL6eq1V V0/9cQIaIL+AdYM2F8478OCjIyZb48HhBa9YR6h5gA1syLkUzL0WhgrBYHm5kiba36A3co3DwX9 yOaz5sx/zgbdU1A6miXFwg+IVs4ZkGCH1y/4q
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IElSx+WuiwuaomMWTaud5PhIv3b3PI1IDRokkZYPa7JpgNfYgmxXA7bufICJ3EEDJPxmhOxQ5thmqPY1Gy5/3k=
X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:35ca:b0:a45:15d5:9267 with SMTP id p10-20020a17090635ca00b00a4515d59267mr145139ejb.63.1709945246038; Fri, 08 Mar 2024 16:47:26 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <SJ0PR00MB1348781EB81293E8A0521F23FA202@SJ0PR00MB1348.namprd00.prod.outlook.com> <CAKD1Yr1GgOBR+Y5x4-+BCzQFp3usPwd_CM05nfwgM6pT5wef1Q@mail.gmail.com> <884F5E11-364C-4D42-B199-B8FEF33C59C4@employees.org> <CAFU7BAQn-EgpL0mukUUnsBt916UA0P9Qw8KYtC5E5vG3ZMOW7w@mail.gmail.com> <10EF7C0B-0690-4AC0-BD7D-4DAB03C23E76@employees.org>
In-Reply-To: <10EF7C0B-0690-4AC0-BD7D-4DAB03C23E76@employees.org>
From: Lorenzo Colitti <lorenzo@google.com>
Date: Sat, 09 Mar 2024 09:47:10 +0900
Message-ID: <CAKD1Yr1+ORMAunum1rpqj_tG997zHV_T34eQNtYstRUaagd8=w@mail.gmail.com>
To: Ole Troan <otroan@employees.org>
Cc: Jen Linkova <furry13@gmail.com>, Tommy Jensen <Jensen.Thomas@microsoft.com>, "v6ops@ietf.org WG" <v6ops@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000fa32a406132fa663"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/v6ops/QYTQoYNKaICIrfSF-ewTDt22EFg>
Subject: Re: [v6ops] FYI: Microsoft's latest on CLAT
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/v6ops/>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 09 Mar 2024 00:47:28 -0000

On Fri, 8 Mar 2024, 22:29 Ole Troan, <otroan@employees.org> wrote:

> >> And I don’t think it even works on my DHCPv6 single address assigned
> network at all (yet to be tested).
> >
> > Nor would IPv6-only.
>
> Why not?
>
>
> > When you made the decision to assign a single IPv6 address per device,
> > I assume you did evaluate pros and cons.
> > It doesn't make the  designs which are incompatible with your choice bad
> ones.
>
> IPv6 mostly in itself is not incompatible with a single IPv6 address.
> That’s an implementation choice. I haven’t had time to test
> implementations yet.
>

It's not an implementation choice. It's required by the model because
464xlat requires a dedicated IPv6 address.

>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email