Re: [v6ops] FYI: Microsoft's latest on CLAT

Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com> Fri, 08 March 2024 19:28 UTC

Return-Path: <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 65EDCC14F69A for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 8 Mar 2024 11:28:49 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -7.196
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.196 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, NICE_REPLY_A=-0.091, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id xNmRd_fnDwP2 for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 8 Mar 2024 11:28:45 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-pf1-x42e.google.com (mail-pf1-x42e.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::42e]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 01CC5C14F603 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Fri, 8 Mar 2024 11:28:44 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-pf1-x42e.google.com with SMTP id d2e1a72fcca58-6e64647af39so2356752b3a.1 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Fri, 08 Mar 2024 11:28:44 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20230601; t=1709926124; x=1710530924; darn=ietf.org; h=content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:from:references:cc:to :content-language:subject:user-agent:mime-version:date:message-id :from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=dZybc0xxXmmT/U8tpyo16A3ZB9pUGOR/FNtNGZD7Vm8=; b=WAAWDVac/ppG/VKCG4MtjIrrBeb4PhmaoEQtMIQF4xbgKhlq7XMOaw07DglaM7bDka /6T9f3C4Yp8rjr7+71F/XN0yDoUhz6IQtjmcuuuz1D6kB1lMpEMEj4XqZE+WlQzU9AAQ +xhdaXuej0+sbLEWGEo66x31o17eCWrti57U4ISaRUtSaiOMdQU1pVCqV62YIuvhRfdK EgB55Eh2ydRA7/gnSh8KbEhJIIcRfLCEnSkDCV9WDDx8fKg3Gvvx0zVWcTM0EeArUhK8 HQ0xpMEqoVuvNrA7igSwET5iQ08YMq5RBSpYOzjs16W5kN3aouUfutv9polhUwRIKlnJ QacQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1709926124; x=1710530924; h=content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:from:references:cc:to :content-language:subject:user-agent:mime-version:date:message-id :x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=dZybc0xxXmmT/U8tpyo16A3ZB9pUGOR/FNtNGZD7Vm8=; b=GYrqrYy7h/8sCxZTmOl8hLm+4Y0Gs+td413jIgdO/WJ2mv5X2IvehggVidcLk2epDH Zf8jo/MtPw1+IbUeqt01IZa2xEiQYQQvDSuTJxaBH/3Kk5m2PuKw9gPdA3i8bf1d44t7 0dcr1b2cogTJVsI+4lz15il0geC6QgC7aP5F/jnqfd1UDbdJuU8ut7pkl0LpcXv3FFKm XVkkQa4xou9j5Oyv1Zob6snMEwDdBHUJLH7VF6YEBLpP9nTdfLRtYOOkBDFxBdsW5iwJ kE6kNcb6a1DrFqy1KUaCKvq4CPkW0shcMphcFzWqcudF7jnLAxpMJXsNYQjJ3r3dlaBn y0/g==
X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=1; AJvYcCVAV0Xfh2YLhk/f5Wh8ko8VYTFAVF2jd6QvvPooJicTf2BJ/9cA1uRohp7W/Q8dlCYadTa3ywXN965zdBJaiA==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YwIFSrtWl6MZZli9F6rjYpE+ubQpC/wQoWFHZ5sQFL9AoyhyHIa IEXkn35Rxtt3y4NYFk5aUoHT2i/bzun8acCtTg+pA+5uYmMXwbiY
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IHjH8jK7WrE1RGjqs0r8gVij2021c5cEQ+G/VqTkHb5T18EwEkwBJIrdMh7ZcMjmVjD7/sNgw==
X-Received: by 2002:a05:6a20:2443:b0:1a1:8c80:4336 with SMTP id t3-20020a056a20244300b001a18c804336mr183335pzc.21.1709926124098; Fri, 08 Mar 2024 11:28:44 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ?IPV6:2404:4400:541d:a600:44b7:2c2e:2bc6:8707? ([2404:4400:541d:a600:44b7:2c2e:2bc6:8707]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id q14-20020a65684e000000b005dcbb855530sm41319pgt.76.2024.03.08.11.28.41 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Fri, 08 Mar 2024 11:28:43 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <b7900248-15cc-a6f4-6574-b41ca1732b93@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 09 Mar 2024 08:28:38 +1300
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/91.10.0
Content-Language: en-US
To: Ole Troan <otroan@employees.org>, Lorenzo Colitti <lorenzo@google.com>
Cc: Tommy Jensen <Jensen.Thomas@microsoft.com>, "v6ops@ietf.org" <v6ops@ietf.org>
References: <SJ0PR00MB1348781EB81293E8A0521F23FA202@SJ0PR00MB1348.namprd00.prod.outlook.com> <CAKD1Yr1GgOBR+Y5x4-+BCzQFp3usPwd_CM05nfwgM6pT5wef1Q@mail.gmail.com> <884F5E11-364C-4D42-B199-B8FEF33C59C4@employees.org>
From: Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <884F5E11-364C-4D42-B199-B8FEF33C59C4@employees.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/v6ops/czIuDqvNQk-b0F65SDl_YYMyhI4>
Subject: Re: [v6ops] FYI: Microsoft's latest on CLAT
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/v6ops/>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 08 Mar 2024 19:28:49 -0000

On 09-Mar-24 00:14, Ole Troan wrote:
> Lorenzo,
> 
> I’m also a fan of IPv6-mostly.
> Isn’t it too early to state that it has lower operational cost than dual-stack (or IPv4 only)?
> What I mostly(sic) like about it, is that it provides a clearer path towards IPv6 only than dual stack.

If you want to get philosophical, dual stack was conceived on the assumption that people would be powerfully motivated to migrate because stuff would break due to the shortage of IPv4 addresses. This was before large-scale NAPT44 was considered viable; in that world the path was fairly clear.

I agree that in the world we now live in, -mostly is the best route for many sites, so the Microsoft announcement is welcome.

    Brian

> 
> But I would imagine at least for the short term there are going to be quite a few operational wrinkles to sort out. It’s likely harder to troubleshoot IPv4 problems too. And I don’t think it even works on my DHCPv6 single address assigned network at all (yet to be tested).
> 
> Cheers,
> Ole
> 
>> On 8 Mar 2024, at 04:52, Lorenzo Colitti <lorenzo=40google.com@dmarc.ietf.org> wrote:
>>
>> Great to hear! I think this means that all the major platforms will support the "IPv6-mostly" operational model that v6ops has been working on for the past few years. That's super important, because it means that any network can use this model with confidence that all their clients will work.
>>
>> Hopefully this will really help adoption of this model in enterprise networks. Dual-stack is expensive to operate, but if IPv6-only works, then any enterprise that wants to support IPv6 in some form can simply skip directly from IPv4-only to IPv6-mostly without having to worry about the costs of dual-stack at all.
>>
>> On Fri, Mar 8, 2024 at 5:05 AM Tommy Jensen <Jensen.Thomas=40microsoft.com@dmarc.ietf.org> wrote:
>> Good day v6ops,
>>
>> As a general IPv6 FYI, I'll share Windows' announcement to bring CLAT to general networking interfaces which went live today: https://techcommunity.microsoft.com/t5/networking-blog/windows-11-plans-to-expand-clat-support/ba-p/4078173
>>
>> Looking forward to seeing everyone in Brisbane and talking about CLAT recommendations, the draft Jen and I are coauthoring, as Windows will be an implementor!
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Tommy
>> _______________________________________________
>> v6ops mailing list
>> v6ops@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops
>> _______________________________________________
>> v6ops mailing list
>> v6ops@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> v6ops mailing list
> v6ops@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops