IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [v6ops] [EXTERNAL] Re: FYI: Microsoft's latest on CLAT

Daryll Swer <contact@daryllswer.com> Sun, 10 March 2024 18:38 UTC

Return-Path: <contact@daryllswer.com>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 099BAC14F5FA for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 10 Mar 2024 11:38:56 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -7.105
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.105 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=daryllswer.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 4J5y3kUAHiUe for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 10 Mar 2024 11:38:55 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-ot1-x331.google.com (mail-ot1-x331.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::331]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 72880C14F5E7 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Sun, 10 Mar 2024 11:38:49 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-ot1-x331.google.com with SMTP id 46e09a7af769-6e5027608a9so1573068a34.1 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Sun, 10 Mar 2024 11:38:49 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=daryllswer.com; s=google; t=1710095928; x=1710700728; darn=ietf.org; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=BTJ+ekpQ94iQcDCIpgvD9f4wUfWg+EGpAhVdtBbAH9s=; b=JgWGhU7slrPPYcYT50BA8lWfq28MX9vevYDwPfakk8TyaqtNI1ZMtBIHwc6GtGMyjS DdeyG5LDgWqsBM6ptWnccJF6pYYjHTq5cE8bJKlzSJFc9/oHpTfGJmNlyVyjh61W7pSk teJGfaTfSpn2CYthRAgTbYy6t5jvo7SNnGvGyJ4P5KdWZSHkQpOkr862s6YzRS12M50F tkTIAYfmSBDAdvQ2YWgQCGZmUNCninPITjhTHW19yyuEvR7imeN0xGbkbt2Rzg2rBxMc 2XN2c9OE1Q+TXlBL0b0btBC4HwVe97JwXkR3U4hfs8CMyEaoSlvGwzCHJQLtm0d1xJHb Eo+g==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1710095928; x=1710700728; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id :reply-to; bh=BTJ+ekpQ94iQcDCIpgvD9f4wUfWg+EGpAhVdtBbAH9s=; b=apAINyXyGk5SvSk4VA3L9/LFZySuQYidJd1uNLK5dZorxr1g6dDhdkcmUMMf92fujy kyyTO3QRAt54aLIOprv45N/Vy6Y1i9/jHtHGwwcl3cSXBwXAYmlTBFPnQNMTSdKyV9YB dSIBex/UT/+9sw7bNgGqVyLs+pxUZ1EcEQDcUIN1D88R7vdE78FJtcEpB4ui0yjprFIh hDp/30AnOnL7Oavz4cOLRmqqeyrXIZ4oVMsoTFtGHxHmiYiVh55BlWKYbGWJFK6X6iHC gY0txWgJR/xfIxF7ODSdNPGLrMIOOEzryM2RJCzvGIRxUN5s/OjyC3iArhxHk9pCA8Ad 0tfA==
X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=1; AJvYcCWGQN4bttYrrj7lK9uzYIPpNASYCdvyIFHtPhWC8+4/3QsQJ+LqDp9oakolGEvMdaUSP+4lz6C1SB/k9Am9zA==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0Yzuz6GMkh8OQ1c+cQuFU1drjlDM/Uwv9kYXGPp256UJmNRaHN7O 9eDWI2J/BhfomIpOuPaIZYPZcq6IvXqPl5iBI93BHMrs6v2W8V+GHwXndmwATcj3jQG+eOalPOv 6Pic=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IE9ODxUqVWir8zuM7D/8vgjt6DmknzldrrIGjyrCi9czqOsa9mDnklzZ8uKMxyg3JVYCO/EPA==
X-Received: by 2002:a9d:7485:0:b0:6e4:9456:6b04 with SMTP id t5-20020a9d7485000000b006e494566b04mr5943659otk.5.1710095927995; Sun, 10 Mar 2024 11:38:47 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-ot1-f49.google.com (mail-ot1-f49.google.com. [209.85.210.49]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id x53-20020a05683040b500b006e4bf489081sm734476ott.14.2024.03.10.11.38.47 for <v6ops@ietf.org> (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Sun, 10 Mar 2024 11:38:47 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-ot1-f49.google.com with SMTP id 46e09a7af769-6ddf26eba3cso2849366a34.0 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Sun, 10 Mar 2024 11:38:47 -0700 (PDT)
X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=1; AJvYcCUHQdDPrR5HWgkflTmi5uSHqaO5aszYTWBo/9X86m6HRJK5Lz1kJAhrgrtk/9kO+5yEnbJ0RJVFpM9OH7q0nA==
X-Received: by 2002:a05:6808:f01:b0:3c2:4a71:7079 with SMTP id m1-20020a0568080f0100b003c24a717079mr1462987oiw.2.1710095927339; Sun, 10 Mar 2024 11:38:47 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <CAFU7BAQsnionnO_VZoxAnqAKad_cuQbyHzFKK4XMai_Hw8-Kyg@mail.gmail.com> <56FFAFE7-94B4-47BD-9139-1A1FA83FB472@employees.org> <1113ad66-424a-4c49-bbab-713916fe357a@fud.no> <SA1PR00MB134236D88803AC93AD95181AFA252@SA1PR00MB1342.namprd00.prod.outlook.com>
In-Reply-To: <SA1PR00MB134236D88803AC93AD95181AFA252@SA1PR00MB1342.namprd00.prod.outlook.com>
From: Daryll Swer <contact@daryllswer.com>
Date: Mon, 11 Mar 2024 00:08:13 +0530
X-Gmail-Original-Message-ID: <CACyFTPF3aA-ntc0Srv7TRU=zvc32vY82XV6GJN8o6cr1o9_XhA@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <CACyFTPF3aA-ntc0Srv7TRU=zvc32vY82XV6GJN8o6cr1o9_XhA@mail.gmail.com>
To: Tommy Jensen <Jensen.Thomas=40microsoft.com@dmarc.ietf.org>
Cc: Tore Anderson <tore@fud.no>, Ole Trøan <otroan=40employees.org@dmarc.ietf.org>, Jen Linkova <furry13@gmail.com>, "v6ops@ietf.org" <v6ops@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="00000000000047f984061352bc7c"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/v6ops/ZeMD5wAUUje8ZUu9BqrHgG0IWCU>
Subject: Re: [v6ops] [EXTERNAL] Re: FYI: Microsoft's latest on CLAT
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/v6ops/>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 10 Mar 2024 18:38:56 -0000

> Jen is correct in linking to our draft, as we are endeavoring for our
proposed text and future product to be in alignment. Deploying IPv6 but
allowing only a single /128 per client does not seem like a scenario we
should be designing for going forward.

Do popular client OSes (Android, iOS, macOS, Windows) automatically request
for a ia_pd? Or how exactly does it work? If on the upstream network, I run
a DHCPv6 server for /127 ia_pd out of say a /64 pool?

*--*
Best Regards
Daryll Swer
Website: daryllswer.com
<https://mailtrack.io/l/5c36fc4a54cb6870a46e3b6f4c92589ff9b2d43c?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.daryllswer.com&u=2153471&signature=326721353e36d3e4>


On Sun, 10 Mar 2024 at 23:13, Tommy Jensen <Jensen.Thomas=
40microsoft.com@dmarc.ietf.org> wrote:

> >>> IPv6 mostly in itself is not incompatible with a single IPv6 address.
> That’s an implementation choice....interesting to see where Microsoft lands
> on this one.
> >>I believe Tommy already mentioned...
>
> Jen is correct in linking to our draft, as we are endeavoring for our
> proposed text and future product to be in alignment. Deploying IPv6 but
> allowing only a single /128 per client does not seem like a scenario we
> should be designing for going forward.
>
> >...e.g., by ensuring that an outbound TCP/UDP connection assigned
> 192.0.2.1:portX claims [2001:db8::1]:portX automatically...
> [2001:db8::1]:portY may be used by a regular native IPv6 socket
> simultaneously.
>
> Note that port collision will occur if an IPv4 socket and an IPv6 socket
> wish to use the same port, where they should not have to worry about that
> (it would be a regression from dual stack networking introduced by the
> implementation choice).
>
> Thanks,
> Tommy
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> v6ops mailing list
> v6ops@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email