IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [v6ops] draft-templin-v6ops-pdhost a working group draft?

Paul Marks <pmarks@google.com> Wed, 29 November 2017 01:32 UTC

Return-Path: <pmarks@google.com>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EA34E126DFE for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 28 Nov 2017 17:32:18 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.701
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.701 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=google.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id V3Vtm7Wwuebw for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 28 Nov 2017 17:32:17 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-wm0-x22a.google.com (mail-wm0-x22a.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c09::22a]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5B701126E7A for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Tue, 28 Nov 2017 17:32:17 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-wm0-x22a.google.com with SMTP id y82so34103122wmg.1 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Tue, 28 Nov 2017 17:32:17 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=Wv6XkjFgNGvhg1Rra+VAhY/pgjSSuqpJZ7XfJSJPuW0=; b=eC09otNO/EHwEU4SM6MOiNq9LVD2iI0BosH7ABXkHZ7xcIYdthgCl+HTfEMEmnfpYn yfa/9br/EWXADAeX47ZncrIJP3enUBgQT/iMxCs+/RbnsK5+vR7yO9Bfc6aIzzMXxYkn T4wOCYTGoV4N2Je8CZwjCtFSC49MA2SULGeJyDndOl4dnKyOpbWUEdhKtJ5ZeXrKDTgV slz8/7wcpmBuNtvVT2EzQs2XaR4NopDnafYVtnqmYSRb6iaXM9cwh/b4VGbi0bUDQDjv gjN1oDBpfqM1dZZK6dPEJzJP3dV6H45TA2/zZO6pNF6x0nniLIjT8F4DvY+IXGp3VX32 G5cg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=Wv6XkjFgNGvhg1Rra+VAhY/pgjSSuqpJZ7XfJSJPuW0=; b=THp9nlE+PfPA9ovszFNpQaHhRO7DGAu9L0kt8MqQRNdA2MGKYCBNmjdueS2kshdrxh 0HX7TD59fvb0pLu3v041bPBjRIdb8UVIshUl2fA7nOPt2m3hdminMrVfno8By4sqOw8/ I7fPz4RlBHKVTy5ySnAwyTuMj8kZd+YJE9f+9PADBq54agQG33aaczLFotnuA6BlA2+5 HOd6s0iv/uqlyQTUWkv16roK7BRTWH7WUJUPhHrr96hmmE8HpbzfsWvNJR5TFt22iyQY /754UmExV0p7h/CU1dPnMI07ojHmNXdNfjy1RH/0L21NdJK+E4tuYTElRQTprtGeufBS vUyA==
X-Gm-Message-State: AJaThX6GmqQucEpwqblYV4S+GvpzFx9z9mLiEXmzFsiJKgIC/ChXhyS8 1zZ/p/FTfTa+1M15JGEydpZtFVm84tzS4FGGFPL2VA==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGs4zMb3Px9q0NXFFDaCsucwXsVtjfv52w9mWJOqiMC6E2Nh3GasqISMliCyT07uo5ZSEq5ciUApqQbQbNag88FiIu0=
X-Received: by 10.28.238.221 with SMTP id j90mr1195511wmi.44.1511919135546; Tue, 28 Nov 2017 17:32:15 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.28.161.4 with HTTP; Tue, 28 Nov 2017 17:31:54 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <34cf035352254aadb3146dffb3baebb0@XCH15-06-08.nw.nos.boeing.com>
References: <34cf035352254aadb3146dffb3baebb0@XCH15-06-08.nw.nos.boeing.com>
From: Paul Marks <pmarks@google.com>
Date: Tue, 28 Nov 2017 17:31:54 -0800
Message-ID: <CAHaKRvJCabgnc3U-ouZ1ghmwYzOQ+H1fDHwKrac6ghxaH=+Zdw@mail.gmail.com>
To: "Templin, Fred L" <Fred.L.Templin@boeing.com>
Cc: "v6ops@ietf.org" <v6ops@ietf.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/v6ops/X-wj1qGb1H1Zim27gfSNHG5oLfs>
Subject: Re: [v6ops] draft-templin-v6ops-pdhost a working group draft?
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/v6ops/>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 29 Nov 2017 01:32:19 -0000

On Tue, Nov 28, 2017 at 12:37 PM, Templin, Fred L
<Fred.L.Templin@boeing.com> wrote:
> See below for an updated version of this draft. This version addresses comments
> received on the list regarding more clearly identifying classes of devices that can
> be considered as ordinary routers.

Have you considered clarifying whether addresses at the top and bottom
of the delegated prefix (RFC 2373, RFC 2526) should be reserved under
this model?

When delegating to a host, I often wonder whether it's technically
incorrect to use prefix::0 as a normal address.  Does anyone know for
sure?

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email