Re: [v6ops] Revised Internet Drafts for allocation of IPv6 space for LISP EIDs

Gert Doering <gert@space.net> Wed, 23 October 2013 16:07 UTC

Return-Path: <gert@space.net>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AAE4C11E840D for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 23 Oct 2013 09:07:17 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.339
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.339 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.260, BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ln31C0Ty4ud5 for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 23 Oct 2013 09:07:14 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mobil.space.net (mobil.space.net [IPv6:2001:608:2:81::67]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D983C11E844C for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Wed, 23 Oct 2013 09:06:49 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mobil.space.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mobil.space.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5C3FB608C9 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Wed, 23 Oct 2013 18:06:49 +0200 (CEST)
X-SpaceNet-Relay: true
Received: from moebius3.space.net (moebius3.Space.Net [IPv6:2001:608:2:2::250]) by mobil.space.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 426BA608BA for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Wed, 23 Oct 2013 18:06:49 +0200 (CEST)
Received: (qmail 33967 invoked by uid 1007); 23 Oct 2013 18:06:49 +0200
Date: Wed, 23 Oct 2013 18:06:49 +0200
From: Gert Doering <gert@space.net>
To: Brian Haberman <brian@innovationslab.net>
Message-ID: <20131023160649.GP50205@Space.Net>
References: <28CFF7E5-E98E-4D97-B7F4-3A18C255253C@gigix.net> <D62C71FC-306F-4F91-97E2-84D6F64A58A3@istaff.org> <5267E96B.1000802@innovationslab.net> <20131023152549.GN50205@Space.Net> <5267EB60.7080105@innovationslab.net> <CAKD1Yr1SpS0e3qDkZyRsiSB-a_oXCi7nWKe2szxW34mJfhJnxw@mail.gmail.com> <5267ED12.4090602@innovationslab.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="jnCIwN96y15MEy/K"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <5267ED12.4090602@innovationslab.net>
X-NCC-RegID: de.space
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)
Cc: "v6ops@ietf.org WG" <v6ops@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [v6ops] Revised Internet Drafts for allocation of IPv6 space for LISP EIDs
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/v6ops>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 23 Oct 2013 16:07:18 -0000

Hi,

On Wed, Oct 23, 2013 at 11:36:50AM -0400, Brian Haberman wrote:
> Keep in mind that the referenced draft went through IETF Last
> Call and was subsequently sent back to the WG due to the concerns raised
> about routing and potentially creating a parallel address registry
> outside of the RIRs.

These are the concerns I share, so I consider this pushback to be good
news.  And no, I do not have reasonable ideas how to solve this, as 
I see this area as one of the hardest points in deploying LISP in a
mixed LISP-talks-to-non-LISP model.

Thanks for the background info.

Gert Doering
        -- NetMaster
-- 
have you enabled IPv6 on something today...?

SpaceNet AG                        Vorstand: Sebastian v. Bomhard
Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14          Aufsichtsratsvors.: A. Grundner-Culemann
D-80807 Muenchen                   HRB: 136055 (AG Muenchen)
Tel: +49 (0)89/32356-444           USt-IdNr.: DE813185279