IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [v6ops] draft-464XLAT not a "trial deployment report" - not to be an ietf-v6ops I.D.

Satoru Matsushima <satoru.matsushima@gmail.com> Tue, 21 February 2012 07:42 UTC

Return-Path: <satoru.matsushima@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F3A9321E8036 for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 20 Feb 2012 23:42:41 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.479
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.479 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.120, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 4WZxOQqWr2WU for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 20 Feb 2012 23:42:41 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-pw0-f44.google.com (mail-pw0-f44.google.com [209.85.160.44]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 86FBE21F85C9 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Mon, 20 Feb 2012 23:42:41 -0800 (PST)
Received: by pbcwz7 with SMTP id wz7so7392866pbc.31 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Mon, 20 Feb 2012 23:42:41 -0800 (PST)
Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of satoru.matsushima@gmail.com designates 10.68.217.170 as permitted sender) client-ip=10.68.217.170;
Authentication-Results: mr.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of satoru.matsushima@gmail.com designates 10.68.217.170 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=satoru.matsushima@gmail.com; dkim=pass header.i=satoru.matsushima@gmail.com
Received: from mr.google.com ([10.68.217.170]) by 10.68.217.170 with SMTP id oz10mr23472785pbc.121.1329810161413 (num_hops = 1); Mon, 20 Feb 2012 23:42:41 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=subject:mime-version:content-type:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to:x-mailer; bh=KnJ1Kxi31pi5o4cjHyH1F7WyjH/oWzaIVamKI7LAEw8=; b=wDmkBmxx/XtroB4EZdXjxT7WpAaNNWwXZvbA4Jqgx0ufl6bG+XprQB9QnW5U8vOCjI KDIhehspOVa48eZZQCpdEOj8wwnpGDXpOWCPvha4L1DzwStSOLOkJmm17NumTeMEGS7W E4zbqVb7czlqYVb70c9P+jj5puJAbrvrO/zdc=
Received: by 10.68.217.170 with SMTP id oz10mr19502248pbc.121.1329810161381; Mon, 20 Feb 2012 23:42:41 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [10.201.80.50] ([202.45.12.141]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id y3sm15387679pbr.46.2012.02.20.23.42.38 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Mon, 20 Feb 2012 23:42:40 -0800 (PST)
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1257)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
From: Satoru Matsushima <satoru.matsushima@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <3D693F0C-0C63-4571-897F-6AF8DBD98F34@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 21 Feb 2012 16:42:36 +0900
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <4A0ACBB6-4598-43FE-9003-CD45AB6C18B7@gmail.com>
References: <BB119B6D-FC99-4637-988D-D17FBB50597A@laposte.net> <4F41255B.3020103@bogus.com> <4F414C28.8040606@gmail.com> <FEB35F33-5CAD-4A86-A48D-393DED45C1C4@gmail.com> <4F42AE5F.702@gmail.com> <81FFB44C-81F7-4C02-996A-80ABDCB1B402@gmail.com> <CAD6AjGQSCD47rTYmAa721_M1zcJwAmeL9UR7xB+rcBJGx-z-OA@mail.gmail.com> <3D693F0C-0C63-4571-897F-6AF8DBD98F34@gmail.com>
To: Cameron Byrne <cb.list6@gmail.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1257)
Cc: Russell Housley <housley@vigilsec.com>, v6ops WG <v6ops@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [v6ops] draft-464XLAT not a "trial deployment report" - not to be an ietf-v6ops I.D.
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/v6ops>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 21 Feb 2012 07:42:42 -0000

On 2012/02/21, at 16:12, Satoru Matsushima wrote:

>> 1.  464XLAT is not the first nor the last to use double translation. That said, double translation is only a corner case in 464XLAT when DNS64 is used.  See section 7.3 of 464XLAT draft for traffic treatment scenarios.
> 
> One clarification. Is it true that double translation is a corner case in 464XLAT _when DNS64 is used_?

Now I got what you mean 'a corner case'. Thanks.
--satoru

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email