Re: [v6ops] draft-464XLAT not a "trial deployment report" - not to be an ietf-v6ops I.D.Re: [v6ops] draft-464XLAT not a "trial deployment report" - not to be an ietf-v6ops I.D.
Satoru Matsushima
2012-02-21
v6ops
/arch/msg/v6ops/mxpz0lFWzEZ1zezvuHTe0GglUyQ/
1487247
1660441
Re: [v6ops] draft-464XLAT not a "trial deployment report" - not to be an ietf-v6ops I.D.Re: [v6ops] draft-464XLAT not a "trial deployment report" - not to be an ietf-v6ops I.D.
Satoru Matsushima
2012-02-21
v6ops
/arch/msg/v6ops/Cx0mHFV-jzhFPsAssN5_Pyn70FY/
1487246
1660441
Re: [v6ops] Last Call: <draft-ietf-v6ops-v6-aaaa-whitelisting-implications-08.txt> (Considerations for Transitioning Content to IPv6) to Informational RFCRe: [v6ops] Last Call: <draft-ietf-v6ops-v6-aaaa-whitelisting-implications-08.txt> (Considerations for Transitioning Content to IPv6) to Informational RFC
Marc Lampo
2012-02-21
v6ops
/arch/msg/v6ops/Hi6psDsG4JjLcaMoPZyeRjVHE5w/
1487245
1660460
Re: [v6ops] draft-464XLAT not a "trial deployment report" - not to be an ietf-v6ops I.D.Re: [v6ops] draft-464XLAT not a "trial deployment report" - not to be an ietf-v6ops I.D.
Cameron Byrne
2012-02-21
v6ops
/arch/msg/v6ops/dKaPvAK1q9matRHhwqg9N7RqZSQ/
1487244
1660441
Re: [v6ops] draft-464XLAT not a "trial deployment report" - not to be an ietf-v6ops I.D.Re: [v6ops] draft-464XLAT not a "trial deployment report" - not to be an ietf-v6ops I.D.
Satoru Matsushima
2012-02-21
v6ops
/arch/msg/v6ops/S8fsK_Q_LHOsIYzkJ4nBKgbe158/
1487243
1660441
Re: [v6ops] new draft: draft-ietf-v6ops-464xlatRe: [v6ops] new draft: draft-ietf-v6ops-464xlat
MAWATARI Masataka
2012-02-21
v6ops
/arch/msg/v6ops/5mOmVOKVkiDdXpUTrvH50OuHoe0/
1487242
1660444
Re: [v6ops] PCP server in draft-ietf-v6ops-6204bisRe: [v6ops] PCP server in draft-ietf-v6ops-6204bis
james woodyatt
2012-02-21
v6ops
/arch/msg/v6ops/8QvwEi_7IuYbuyuT09V_dbGs8dY/
1487241
1660462
Re: [v6ops] Last Call: <draft-ietf-v6ops-v6-aaaa-whitelisting-implications-08.txt> (Considerations for Transitioning Content to IPv6) to Informational RFCRe: [v6ops] Last Call: <draft-ietf-v6ops-v6-aaaa-whitelisting-implications-08.txt> (Considerations for Transitioning Content to IPv6) to Informational RFC
Ronald Bonica
2012-02-20
v6ops
/arch/msg/v6ops/rH75uNNM53pwVI0vagwxgIjxs7Y/
1487240
1660460
Re: [v6ops] Last Call: <draft-ietf-v6ops-v6-aaaa-whitelisting-implications-08.txt> (Considerations for Transitioning Content to IPv6) to Informational RFCRe: [v6ops] Last Call: <draft-ietf-v6ops-v6-aaaa-whitelisting-implications-08.txt> (Considerations for Transitioning Content to IPv6) to Informational RFC
Mark Andrews
2012-02-20
v6ops
/arch/msg/v6ops/4106OpGRCTDx0EwoqN6VtI3pjg4/
1487239
1660460
Re: [v6ops] PCP server in draft-ietf-v6ops-6204bisRe: [v6ops] PCP server in draft-ietf-v6ops-6204bis
Hemant Singh (shemant)
2012-02-20
v6ops
/arch/msg/v6ops/smeUjiUgcYTi1WCHl29C6Pki8kY/
1487238
1660462
Re: [v6ops] Last Call: <draft-ietf-v6ops-v6-aaaa-whitelisting-implications-08.txt> (Considerations for Transitioning Content to IPv6) to Informational RFCRe: [v6ops] Last Call: <draft-ietf-v6ops-v6-aaaa-whitelisting-implications-08.txt> (Considerations for Transitioning Content to IPv6) to Informational RFC
Joel jaeggli
2012-02-20
v6ops
/arch/msg/v6ops/m4e1zfm3pnPvktJIDJb9QhSQkC0/
1487237
1660460
Re: [v6ops] Last Call: <draft-ietf-v6ops-v6-aaaa-whitelisting-implications-08.txt> (Considerations for Transitioning Content to IPv6) to Informational RFCRe: [v6ops] Last Call: <draft-ietf-v6ops-v6-aaaa-whitelisting-implications-08.txt> (Considerations for Transitioning Content to IPv6) to Informational RFC
Mark Andrews
2012-02-20
v6ops
/arch/msg/v6ops/Kq-fDiDXpbLgnin2qJmJGDvkv_c/
1487236
1660460
Re: [v6ops] draft-464XLAT not a "trial deployment report" - not to be an ietf-v6ops I.D.Re: [v6ops] draft-464XLAT not a "trial deployment report" - not to be an ietf-v6ops I.D.
Brian E Carpenter
2012-02-20
v6ops
/arch/msg/v6ops/bEW69vq0VG_I6UMfZfJgtnhSTq8/
1487235
1660441
Re: [v6ops] new draft: draft-ietf-v6ops-464xlatRe: [v6ops] new draft: draft-ietf-v6ops-464xlat
Joel jaeggli
2012-02-20
v6ops
/arch/msg/v6ops/haeewmvZGrztE4rsaWkHhikP328/
1487234
1660444
Re: [v6ops] 464XLAT and the term "architecture" -- WAS draft-464XLAT not a "trial deployment report"Re: [v6ops] 464XLAT and the term "architecture" -- WAS draft-464XLAT not a "trial deployment report"
Brian E Carpenter
2012-02-20
v6ops
/arch/msg/v6ops/x4twXTteokFurWQBmpinnya1DeA/
1487233
1660440
Re: [v6ops] draft-464XLAT not a "trial deployment report" - not to be an ietf-v6ops I.D.Re: [v6ops] draft-464XLAT not a "trial deployment report" - not to be an ietf-v6ops I.D.
Cameron Byrne
2012-02-20
v6ops
/arch/msg/v6ops/KaYiN41RBD2_HZSLS4hB_nsuVZM/
1487232
1660441
Re: [v6ops] new draft: draft-ietf-v6ops-ra-guard-implementationRe: [v6ops] new draft: draft-ietf-v6ops-ra-guard-implementation
Ray Hunter
2012-02-20
v6ops
/arch/msg/v6ops/fuo5xA1BekIyIq8dChOqDaWNIL4/
1487231
1660447
Re: [v6ops] draft-464XLAT not a "trial deployment report" - not to be an ietf-v6ops I.D.Re: [v6ops] draft-464XLAT not a "trial deployment report" - not to be an ietf-v6ops I.D.
Joel jaeggli
2012-02-20
v6ops
/arch/msg/v6ops/5vckL9TMwNqn9gsH9RoNOplzFn0/
1487230
1660441
Re: [v6ops] draft-464XLAT not a "trial deployment report" - not to be an ietf-v6ops I.D.Re: [v6ops] draft-464XLAT not a "trial deployment report" - not to be an ietf-v6ops I.D.
Rémi Després
2012-02-20
v6ops
/arch/msg/v6ops/KLYVmShy2tmig_uD2MlAzwFrstA/
1487229
1660441
Re: [v6ops] draft-464XLAT not a "trial deployment report" - not to be an ietf-v6ops I.D.Re: [v6ops] draft-464XLAT not a "trial deployment report" - not to be an ietf-v6ops I.D.
Wojciech Dec
2012-02-20
v6ops
/arch/msg/v6ops/wnnjDmr5mjx6u3_2Ycs7yiWcbiQ/
1487228
1660441
Re: [v6ops] draft-464XLAT not a "trial deployment report" - not to be an ietf-v6ops I.D.Re: [v6ops] draft-464XLAT not a "trial deployment report" - not to be an ietf-v6ops I.D.
Cameron Byrne
2012-02-20
v6ops
/arch/msg/v6ops/4whYmsDxiN6_HJyolF_SJ4AFOyc/
1487227
1660441
Re: [v6ops] Last Call: <draft-ietf-v6ops-v6-aaaa-whitelisting-implications-08.txt> (Considerations for Transitioning Content to IPv6) to Informational RFCRe: [v6ops] Last Call: <draft-ietf-v6ops-v6-aaaa-whitelisting-implications-08.txt> (Considerations for Transitioning Content to IPv6) to Informational RFC
Havard Eidnes
2012-02-20
v6ops
/arch/msg/v6ops/P5u2PsRC3YXQYZ3v9ZBFdwRni_A/
1487226
1660460
Re: [v6ops] draft-464XLAT not a "trial deployment report" - not to be an ietf-v6ops I.D.Re: [v6ops] draft-464XLAT not a "trial deployment report" - not to be an ietf-v6ops I.D.
Cameron Byrne
2012-02-20
v6ops
/arch/msg/v6ops/br3ebNpsSt8ISxXHCBvwXsFP1o4/
1487225
1660441
Re: [v6ops] draft-464XLAT not a "trial deployment report" - not to be an ietf-v6ops I.D.Re: [v6ops] draft-464XLAT not a "trial deployment report" - not to be an ietf-v6ops I.D.
Cameron Byrne
2012-02-20
v6ops
/arch/msg/v6ops/iuTVFNlghmBW32ABuRp6knomcE4/
1487224
1660441
Re: [v6ops] Last Call: <draft-ietf-v6ops-v6-aaaa-whitelisting-implications-08.txt> (Considerations for Transitioning Content to IPv6) to Informational RFCRe: [v6ops] Last Call: <draft-ietf-v6ops-v6-aaaa-whitelisting-implications-08.txt> (Considerations for Transitioning Content to IPv6) to Informational RFC
Ronald Bonica
2012-02-20
v6ops
/arch/msg/v6ops/8apUZYu33Ui1VYBTqdO5ZRFZPQU/
1487223
1660460
Re: [v6ops] Last Call: <draft-ietf-v6ops-v6-aaaa-whitelisting-implications-08.txt> (Considerations for Transitioning Content to IPv6) to Informational RFCRe: [v6ops] Last Call: <draft-ietf-v6ops-v6-aaaa-whitelisting-implications-08.txt> (Considerations for Transitioning Content to IPv6) to Informational RFC
Marc Lampo
2012-02-20
v6ops
/arch/msg/v6ops/zlpqKv9Sj8XdusAFfRUT5OlKZvU/
1487222
1660460
Re: [v6ops] new draft: draft-ietf-v6ops-464xlatRe: [v6ops] new draft: draft-ietf-v6ops-464xlat
Vízdal Aleš
2012-02-20
v6ops
/arch/msg/v6ops/nLa844nqBu5WcCkHfYqSVKUGcvQ/
1487221
1660444
Re: [v6ops] draft-464XLAT not a "trial deployment report" - not to be an ietf-v6ops I.D.Re: [v6ops] draft-464XLAT not a "trial deployment report" - not to be an ietf-v6ops I.D.
Rémi Després
2012-02-20
v6ops
/arch/msg/v6ops/exypnunF0lpuSsjOPb9DMU7CQww/
1487220
1660441
Re: [v6ops] draft-464XLAT not a "trial deployment report" - not to be an ietf-v6ops I.D.Re: [v6ops] draft-464XLAT not a "trial deployment report" - not to be an ietf-v6ops I.D.
Wojciech Dec
2012-02-20
v6ops
/arch/msg/v6ops/_Xhwc2xQm_dZ6ShMpgvONL-xDCo/
1487219
1660441
Re: [v6ops] draft-464XLAT not a "trial deployment report" - not to be an ietf-v6ops I.D.Re: [v6ops] draft-464XLAT not a "trial deployment report" - not to be an ietf-v6ops I.D.
Rémi Després
2012-02-20
v6ops
/arch/msg/v6ops/DrFQeWDqkGzFhk63Nn3v2b3tQLU/
1487218
1660441
Re: [v6ops] draft-464XLAT not a "trial deployment report" - not to be an ietf-v6ops I.D.Re: [v6ops] draft-464XLAT not a "trial deployment report" - not to be an ietf-v6ops I.D.
tsavo.stds@gmail.com
2012-02-20
v6ops
/arch/msg/v6ops/EZFsBUY6kQLJxVOuiWYLufzyD8I/
1487217
1660441
Re: [v6ops] draft-464XLAT not a "trial deployment report" - not to be an ietf-v6ops I.D.Re: [v6ops] draft-464XLAT not a "trial deployment report" - not to be an ietf-v6ops I.D.
Rémi Després
2012-02-20
v6ops
/arch/msg/v6ops/huccpp1DH1Rh3wp5SvXMFGN2CYw/
1487216
1660441
Re: [v6ops] draft-464XLAT not a "trial deployment report" - not to be an ietf-v6ops I.D.Re: [v6ops] draft-464XLAT not a "trial deployment report" - not to be an ietf-v6ops I.D.
Satoru Matsushima
2012-02-20
v6ops
/arch/msg/v6ops/-bK4gnoqJzhnQlTz3LydOQTfaao/
1487215
1660441
[v6ops] 464XLAT and the term "architecture" -- WAS draft-464XLAT not a "trial deployment report"[v6ops] 464XLAT and the term "architecture" -- WAS draft-464XLAT not a "trial deployment report"
Cameron Byrne
2012-02-20
v6ops
/arch/msg/v6ops/VO598Pz6dy4_W75Qpc3Wrn-ENv4/
1487214
1660440
Re: [v6ops] draft-464XLAT not a "trial deployment report" - not to be an ietf-v6ops I.D.Re: [v6ops] draft-464XLAT not a "trial deployment report" - not to be an ietf-v6ops I.D.
Victor Kuarsingh
2012-02-19
v6ops
/arch/msg/v6ops/by-xcT4HbsMjp26mE-F8cdliRHY/
1487213
1660441
Re: [v6ops] draft-464XLAT not a "trial deployment report" - not to be an ietf-v6ops I.D.Re: [v6ops] draft-464XLAT not a "trial deployment report" - not to be an ietf-v6ops I.D.
Brian E Carpenter
2012-02-19
v6ops
/arch/msg/v6ops/yQG8A9SekQyG-nsbGvz5-4QLe7Q/
1487212
1660441
Re: [v6ops] draft-464XLAT not a "trial deployment report" - not to be an ietf-v6ops I.D.Re: [v6ops] draft-464XLAT not a "trial deployment report" - not to be an ietf-v6ops I.D.
Joel jaeggli
2012-02-19
v6ops
/arch/msg/v6ops/fM3Wiq6JafbjdaAEsi13D0Dgi0Q/
1487211
1660441
Re: [v6ops] draft-464XLAT not a "trial deployment report" - not to be an ietf-v6ops I.D.Re: [v6ops] draft-464XLAT not a "trial deployment report" - not to be an ietf-v6ops I.D.
Cameron Byrne
2012-02-19
v6ops
/arch/msg/v6ops/5gBjsFNCRrWEgEOlGFqvk0MqXvs/
1487210
1660441
[v6ops] draft-464XLAT not a "trial deployment report" - not to be an ietf-v6ops I.D.[v6ops] draft-464XLAT not a "trial deployment report" - not to be an ietf-v6ops I.D.
Rémi Després
2012-02-19
v6ops
/arch/msg/v6ops/117WAEFkewhfACWH5ATX3e4zaEc/
1487209
1660441
Re: [v6ops] PD-exclude was approved by the IESG -> should be includedinto 6204bisRe: [v6ops] PD-exclude was approved by the IESG -> should be includedinto 6204bis
Hemant Singh (shemant)
2012-02-17
v6ops
/arch/msg/v6ops/he-Pijt36XoVjy7TR0d4a471suk/
1487208
1660442