IETF Logo Mail Archive

[video-codec] draft-filippov-netvc-requirements-01

"Ali C. Begen (abegen)" <abegen@cisco.com> Tue, 21 July 2015 14:22 UTC

Return-Path: <abegen@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: video-codec@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: video-codec@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 188C61B2E50 for <video-codec@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 21 Jul 2015 07:22:47 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -14.511
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.511 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id InZl7EaEMFsA for <video-codec@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 21 Jul 2015 07:22:40 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from alln-iport-3.cisco.com (alln-iport-3.cisco.com [173.37.142.90]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A16171B2E6E for <video-codec@ietf.org>; Tue, 21 Jul 2015 07:22:40 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=1262; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1437488560; x=1438698160; h=from:to:subject:date:message-id:content-id: content-transfer-encoding:mime-version; bh=4VEDp3z3a4vJ4fRUNjdlIZxcLi45jQzfrVpVUpvVIOc=; b=akCQF21Xk5fN/wyZsjrBcYT+Ar0gdq4fpLCQ/gjetO0fkIuGCvgXi53+ T0msUzlkn6XPurH/4thTWT76IRA2XWWcSbty7d0u5/331J6EuNtSHRoSO ZEkJ8J5yp/+p34+0MwW8WwJ1NSELR2goKPftDdxqEgyShUENdMdrJqo1X c=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A0ALBQBQVa5V/49dJa1cgxOBQ8QngR47EQEBAQEBAQGBCoQqIxFXASICJgIEMBUSBIhBpQKPX5ZEAQEBAQEFAQEBAQEBAQEagSKSHy+BFAWRSIMLAYwpgUOHLHCPLyaDfII2gQQBAQE
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.15,516,1432598400"; d="scan'208";a="170688463"
Received: from rcdn-core-7.cisco.com ([173.37.93.143]) by alln-iport-3.cisco.com with ESMTP; 21 Jul 2015 14:22:39 +0000
Received: from xhc-aln-x14.cisco.com (xhc-aln-x14.cisco.com [173.36.12.88]) by rcdn-core-7.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id t6LEMdS5015168 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL) for <video-codec@ietf.org>; Tue, 21 Jul 2015 14:22:39 GMT
Received: from xmb-aln-x01.cisco.com ([169.254.2.64]) by xhc-aln-x14.cisco.com ([173.36.12.88]) with mapi id 14.03.0195.001; Tue, 21 Jul 2015 09:22:39 -0500
From: "Ali C. Begen (abegen)" <abegen@cisco.com>
To: "video-codec@ietf.org" <video-codec@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: draft-filippov-netvc-requirements-01
Thread-Index: AQHQw8CyW0GCvpXJZECxIZTezzBngA==
Date: Tue, 21 Jul 2015 14:22:39 +0000
Message-ID: <32AA73C5-0D17-4ECE-A02D-041C5147D9E5@cisco.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/0.0.0.150701
x-originating-ip: [10.61.108.86]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-ID: <131415CCE744F845868F93DDCF6A2E63@emea.cisco.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/video-codec/MDX2f1BA-jWMAew6Y67Ma6k4wpU>
Subject: [video-codec] draft-filippov-netvc-requirements-01
X-BeenThere: video-codec@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Video codec BoF discussion list <video-codec.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/video-codec>, <mailto:video-codec-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/video-codec/>
List-Post: <mailto:video-codec@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:video-codec-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/video-codec>, <mailto:video-codec-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 21 Jul 2015 14:22:47 -0000

I read this draft after seeing the presentation yesterday. Overall, I dont like the fact that this draft tries to cover a lot of use cases quite narrowly. There are so many omissions here and there.

The charter for this WG is to provide a good codec for interactive video applications. So all the rest of the use cases should be dropped and not discussed at all.

This WG should spend whatever energy it has to focus on the primary use case (interactive video) like RTCweb, conferencing, etc. I dont think we have the energy to create a codec that will satisfy world’s all video demands.

So IPTV, game streaming and video sharing should be removed from the reqs document. I am not so sure about video monitoring, though, as it has quite many similarities to interactive video. 

FWIW, I argue that interlacing should not be considered in this WG (or at all for any video codec) moving forward. 

-acbegen

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email