[vmeet] Stockholm

John Leslie <john@jlc.net> Mon, 27 July 2009 05:53 UTC

Return-Path: <john@jlc.net>
X-Original-To: vmeet@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: vmeet@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 307D73A69FA for <vmeet@core3.amsl.com>; Sun, 26 Jul 2009 22:53:12 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -5.73
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.73 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.001, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4, SARE_MLH_Stock1=0.87]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id AmitijGHmCds for <vmeet@core3.amsl.com>; Sun, 26 Jul 2009 22:53:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mailhost.jlc.net (mailhost.jlc.net [199.201.159.9]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6BCFA3A698F for <vmeet@ietf.org>; Sun, 26 Jul 2009 22:53:08 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mailhost.jlc.net (Postfix, from userid 104) id 8EB7C33C2B; Mon, 27 Jul 2009 01:53:08 -0400 (EDT)
Date: Mon, 27 Jul 2009 01:53:08 -0400
From: John Leslie <john@jlc.net>
To: vmeet@ietf.org
Message-ID: <20090727055308.GB9935@verdi>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i
Subject: [vmeet] Stockholm
X-BeenThere: vmeet@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF remote participation meeting services discussion <vmeet.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/vmeet>, <mailto:vmeet-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/vmeet>
List-Post: <mailto:vmeet@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:vmeet-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/vmeet>, <mailto:vmeet-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 27 Jul 2009 05:53:12 -0000

   IETF75 is upon us!

   I at least am committed to remote participation for IETF75: I have
set aside the usual meeting hours, and will follow remote audio, jabber,
and perhaps some Webex from my (Eastern Time Zone) office.

   I know there was a commitment of some Webex during IETF75 by Cisco:
last I heard it was intended to have "at least one room" enabled for
"instant-on" Webex. (I have not heard anything about "which" room...)

   IESG has pretty much shifted to Webex for their telechats. It makes
it considerably easier to follow who's saying what, and the display of
the current agenda item (such as ballot status) helps direct attention
to the issue at hand.

   There is, alas, more effort spent in chasing echo problems; and there
may be more problems of dropping off the call (though the IP audio seems
rock solid, it suffers multi-second delay, so most folks use dial-in).

   I think it would be good to document remote-participation experiences
at IETF75. What do others think?

--
John Leslie <john@jlc.net>