Re: [vwrap] The <embed> tag... is the group still interested in LLSD or DSD?

Dzonatas Sol <dzonatas@gmail.com> Sun, 08 May 2011 15:48 UTC

Return-Path: <dzonatas@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: vwrap@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: vwrap@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B7DC9E0789 for <vwrap@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 8 May 2011 08:48:39 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.933
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.933 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.334, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id IqoRf71TDLOr for <vwrap@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 8 May 2011 08:48:38 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pz0-f44.google.com (mail-pz0-f44.google.com [209.85.210.44]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 87E11E0787 for <vwrap@ietf.org>; Sun, 8 May 2011 08:48:37 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by pzk5 with SMTP id 5so2755609pzk.31 for <vwrap@ietf.org>; Sun, 08 May 2011 08:48:37 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to :subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=M/56YbmW3CLtRRjOqe799yXP+vYOl/zyHVMYyy+/d7k=; b=iUCXc/nxnI94t+tMe78+dy2shzuDAaAyO/oJaneHZnAJ8TGwAN924oQspr8Xm8yO3N ELUtT22oQqQgFe37cBQXPvM1AhmptukTs7M4AJCgvVlZXp+vVfZYYhtn5yfmbUhnkJKh 0ujVDUpzWJ8/PrbvPEovUWwMwjdihD50vk9s4=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references :in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=vYDUK2LsRXjzPk/C+sifOcp6AejQObOAVJJBtHxJNchJHUncMypTd2X0IEgaZQJKQY TKsyayEzxsBpfxw8Zk8PhXBMTc0oUME4oiVl3QYo+fUBYxiMdqyqHjTtbyygFLcJ7xoL K2VnScetKw9Pem+Kxkyl8F9sC+VTzJgbi+8II=
Received: by 10.68.11.196 with SMTP id s4mr8270598pbb.301.1304869717407; Sun, 08 May 2011 08:48:37 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.0.50] (adsl-70-133-70-225.dsl.scrm01.sbcglobal.net [70.133.70.225]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id p2sm3511081pbq.6.2011.05.08.08.48.35 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Sun, 08 May 2011 08:48:36 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <4DC6BB19.1050305@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 08 May 2011 08:47:37 -0700
From: Dzonatas Sol <dzonatas@gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.1.16) Gecko/20110307 Icedove/3.0.11
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: vwrap@ietf.org
References: <BANLkTi=g9T5q5bVgytpxRxuE=Oc9iG2F9w@mail.gmail.com> <4DC1956A.5020204@gmail.com> <BANLkTik8rnsKP4xq+Gj5G4dsG=UOVnkNSQ@mail.gmail.com> <4DC1A8C9.9090406@gmail.com> <BANLkTikkOS34CC+ML0JNJgHDoRqbs9rY9w@mail.gmail.com> <4DC1D165.7010705@gmail.com> <4DC1D5FC.6040608@gmail.com> <BANLkTik81Eht3NTdLXXmgqOWvjc2s_KBnw@mail.gmail.com> <BANLkTi=-heHa35w43te0ba8NufkT+MP+CQ@mail.gmail.com> <BANLkTin6ExR7+xpodbtoTAS_4WyhUXL92Q@mail.gmail.com> <BANLkTikjKib79_rLR_s2X=X-ss-+V_yw+w@mail.gmail.com> <BANLkTim4aY7oNALbOfZ2V-htivVmQJZDiA@mail.gmail.com> <BANLkTi=7MDUAfjJb697uRwrrxB-4v5fQ3A@mail.gmail.com> <BANLkTi=AeC1oLNGFwUWs0Yp_JNEKcaSsag@mail.gmail.com> <BANLkTinNtJiq4JH5qvf36kiKmFtAQArvAA@mail.gmail.com> <4DC60610.3040606@gmail.com> <BANLkTinwSxG3=3eSnKjvFSB1k7fYOEKwPg@mail.gmail.com> <4DC61E3C.5080307@gmail.com> <BANLkTin=tyc+rUy=RvqCJ9r34j90v1nSGg@mail.gmail.com> <4DC6840B.9050203@gmail.com> <BANLkTinE87mmqLZyqgzWsEfi9cOk2br2nQ@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <BANLkTinE87mmqLZyqgzWsEfi9cOk2br2nQ@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: [vwrap] The <embed> tag... is the group still interested in LLSD or DSD?
X-BeenThere: vwrap@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Virtual World Region Agent Protocol - IETF working group <vwrap.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/vwrap>, <mailto:vwrap-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/vwrap>
List-Post: <mailto:vwrap@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:vwrap-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/vwrap>, <mailto:vwrap-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 08 May 2011 15:48:39 -0000

Start with the solution (and the charter).

On 05/08/2011 05:38 AM, Morgaine wrote:
> "I don't have exact text, we're working out the details first on the 
> list, and once we have those worked out, and we see a consensus 
> forming, then we can start writing an updated document ready for the 
> next draft."

We need "best effort" first brought to the table. If you have something 
you can bring to this list and kill() if that something goes completely 
wrong, perfect enough. If you try to build something here first, then 
you don't have something OF YOUR OWN to kill.

 > "...please don't block us from working on it."

Please, don't try to turn this around back in the opposite direction 
again and blame biosystematicals on me. If you want to go in the 
opposite direction, the bring what you already have to the table.

 > "You're confusing two different "LLSD"."

We have not confused multiple licenses. Others on this list (and other 
WGs) have demonstrated awareness of this and don't cross-judge this 
documentation based on theirs or others implementation.

Blackbox the details on another list. Clarify the protocol on this list. 
Simple. Also note, some of us are doctors and some of us are scientists. 
There are reasons we don't share the pen, as this principle alone kills 
the obvious argument. Please consider *at least this much* about the pen 
with everything you write here. If you want to write the draft, then be 
the doctor! Don't kill() others scientists.

Dear Happy Mothers Day, thanks for the most awesome academy!

-- 
--- https://twitter.com/Dzonatas_Sol ---
Web Development, Software Engineering, Virtual Reality, Consultant