IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [vwrap] The <embed> tag... is the group still interested in LLSD or DSD?

Dzonatas Sol <dzonatas@gmail.com> Fri, 06 May 2011 20:35 UTC

Return-Path: <dzonatas@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: vwrap@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: vwrap@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 73758E07DA for <vwrap@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 6 May 2011 13:35:35 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.657
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.657 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.058, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id KCxya0rnv1-m for <vwrap@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 6 May 2011 13:35:34 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pz0-f44.google.com (mail-pz0-f44.google.com [209.85.210.44]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C2F79E07D1 for <vwrap@ietf.org>; Fri, 6 May 2011 13:35:34 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by pzk5 with SMTP id 5so2058729pzk.31 for <vwrap@ietf.org>; Fri, 06 May 2011 13:35:34 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to :subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=86xvQrYR7puqak+3NGUWmfr0GiMC0FHtjN2KKaaKnUU=; b=Ncb7aWUtkU2zYn2xQSEnAUSR7npzN5DeOaoaMaWrWiJr1yu7inF0k/QXb9kGJw2rVb QExdMIgM3P+D5unjemwC7ACYULsq6W2ZP6i5j4Ozi3tYpa9AjNWK18wadOsAnOijM59q F93vVCkMQuJWw7uny8uOW/f4RbrfJwEFoBTsI=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references :in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=bs1CZugkXvwY++q8WDQVbp3KC/C5lHAy95/HL6xgrZ8TBHlWeBqsyLBoS2jdQwyWvr CvawZR0EeG9Gl+ymHfZ+7JxDBkKq2YUSHH6ECpcSf0hbA8NjXaGbEdy8k7IlYUyOiUry k6OtsiueJBrfB4j1XqDodkTj0zn1tKpXRwVt8=
Received: by 10.68.59.73 with SMTP id x9mr5160990pbq.452.1304714134466; Fri, 06 May 2011 13:35:34 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.0.50] ([70.133.70.225]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id g5sm2347118pbj.62.2011.05.06.13.35.32 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Fri, 06 May 2011 13:35:33 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <4DC45B56.1020604@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 06 May 2011 13:34:30 -0700
From: Dzonatas Sol <dzonatas@gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.1.16) Gecko/20110307 Icedove/3.0.11
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: vwrap@ietf.org
References: <BANLkTi=g9T5q5bVgytpxRxuE=Oc9iG2F9w@mail.gmail.com> <BANLkTi=K8-6oL-JJoPCfz0JjDpaRBpeOyg@mail.gmail.com> <4DC15504.3090503@gmail.com> <BANLkTikay4xhQoZs2L0uRLSXgUMfCE9yfA@mail.gmail.com> <4DC160F0.1030201@gmail.com> <BANLkTikTYpLHM=GAeGAVfufqZ5XT0FSAzw@mail.gmail.com> <BANLkTi=kjBSuMjPcgfXTUvZ3iwmS1bN50Q@mail.gmail.com> <4DC17704.3020201@gmail.com> <BANLkTimpGpNrkE3WUdurduqrVumocDRwfQ@mail.gmail.com> <4DC1824B.6040609@gmail.com> <BANLkTi=hhsiDs=fdZRsthp_+5Hs+pR4L6A@mail.gmail.com> <4DC1956A.5020204@gmail.com> <BANLkTik8rnsKP4xq+Gj5G4dsG=UOVnkNSQ@mail.gmail.com> <4DC1A8C9.9090406@gmail.com> <BANLkTikkOS34CC+ML0JNJgHDoRqbs9rY9w@mail.gmail.com> <4DC1D165.7010705@gmail.com> <4DC1D5FC.6040608@gmail.com> <BANLkTik81Eht3NTdLXXmgqOWvjc2s_KBnw@mail.gmail.com> <BANLkTi=-heHa35w43te0ba8NufkT+MP+CQ@mail.gmail.com> <BANLkTin6ExR7+xpodbtoTAS_4WyhUXL92Q@mail.gmail.com> <BANLkTikjKib79_rLR_s2X=X-ss-+V_yw+w@mail.gmail.com> <BANLkTim4aY7oNALbOfZ2V-htivVmQJZDiA@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <BANLkTim4aY7oNALbOfZ2V-htivVmQJZDiA@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: [vwrap] The <embed> tag... is the group still interested in LLSD or DSD?
X-BeenThere: vwrap@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Virtual World Region Agent Protocol - IETF working group <vwrap.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/vwrap>, <mailto:vwrap-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/vwrap>
List-Post: <mailto:vwrap@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:vwrap-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/vwrap>, <mailto:vwrap-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 06 May 2011 20:35:35 -0000

On 05/06/2011 09:18 AM, Joshua Bell wrote:
>
> As far as adding new types: I believe there was the belief that this 
> could be accommodated by defining an "LLSD2" at some point in the 
> future with a distinct MIME type for serializations (e.g. 
> application/llsd2+xml); unlike the Web, content negotiation over HTTP 
> was assumed to be functional within VWRAP interoperation.

+1

Or, Content-Type: application/llsd+1+xml
Or, Content-Type: application/llsd++xml
Or, Content-Type: xml-ietf-vwrap/llsd+adt+extra

...etc, would work yet I believe - and + still are transient denotations 
for with or without DTD, so...

Content-Type: xml-ietf-vwrap/urn:[bank]:llsd.proxy.net:map,abstract,...

Yes, LLSD as-is continues to work even without excessive headers.


-- 
--- https://twitter.com/Dzonatas_Sol ---
Web Development, Software Engineering, Virtual Reality, Consultant

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email