Re: [vwrap] The <embed> tag... is the group still interested in LLSD or DSD?

Dzonatas Sol <dzonatas@gmail.com> Sun, 08 May 2011 11:53 UTC

Return-Path: <dzonatas@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: vwrap@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: vwrap@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 87FA6E067C for <vwrap@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 8 May 2011 04:53:44 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.942
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.942 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.343, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id FFAuaJW2I+rM for <vwrap@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 8 May 2011 04:53:43 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pv0-f172.google.com (mail-pv0-f172.google.com [74.125.83.172]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AFC6CE065A for <vwrap@ietf.org>; Sun, 8 May 2011 04:53:43 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by pvh1 with SMTP id 1so2694920pvh.31 for <vwrap@ietf.org>; Sun, 08 May 2011 04:53:43 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to :subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=7r5QxcgGNu+Nza13Tz+Rj0N6od15btRFc2m74/DywJg=; b=dKfrsM0DmLQCL5I7HA1My3t0qAav4xMCYgu3ELrE3VH5K5kyJXhsCw9hSYSjnWJjAL lnxfQdFoCyIhNFGTh5HS1nqPHkFRmIMzy3buSUHeadObv0HumgY1y361Gv9r7dA2X/EH M9wDyvAHgTYwwpeNBBohb8FlElJi8BtAfbB3I=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references :in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=tYLdmFQa0sovyCcQxSOWMejxx3WleySwHYo7iy0RsC3svnuUBKo8pX5GgdmHOBTvhk +WKq4Iqvps/teuF3z9+t8nXQZ1Pr0t93j7ZeQiAp/10Skd7vVkOs6IKgiGC4M/SUdBhF 2DuAr3/3gRF7FxMXTRNVn1+Ev4Te4Khivn4k8=
Received: by 10.68.50.72 with SMTP id a8mr8124543pbo.364.1304855623096; Sun, 08 May 2011 04:53:43 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.0.50] ([70.133.70.225]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id r2sm3407708pbp.99.2011.05.08.04.53.41 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Sun, 08 May 2011 04:53:41 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <4DC6840B.9050203@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 08 May 2011 04:52:43 -0700
From: Dzonatas Sol <dzonatas@gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.1.16) Gecko/20110307 Icedove/3.0.11
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: vwrap@ietf.org
References: <BANLkTi=g9T5q5bVgytpxRxuE=Oc9iG2F9w@mail.gmail.com> <4DC1824B.6040609@gmail.com> <BANLkTi=hhsiDs=fdZRsthp_+5Hs+pR4L6A@mail.gmail.com> <4DC1956A.5020204@gmail.com> <BANLkTik8rnsKP4xq+Gj5G4dsG=UOVnkNSQ@mail.gmail.com> <4DC1A8C9.9090406@gmail.com> <BANLkTikkOS34CC+ML0JNJgHDoRqbs9rY9w@mail.gmail.com> <4DC1D165.7010705@gmail.com> <4DC1D5FC.6040608@gmail.com> <BANLkTik81Eht3NTdLXXmgqOWvjc2s_KBnw@mail.gmail.com> <BANLkTi=-heHa35w43te0ba8NufkT+MP+CQ@mail.gmail.com> <BANLkTin6ExR7+xpodbtoTAS_4WyhUXL92Q@mail.gmail.com> <BANLkTikjKib79_rLR_s2X=X-ss-+V_yw+w@mail.gmail.com> <BANLkTim4aY7oNALbOfZ2V-htivVmQJZDiA@mail.gmail.com> <BANLkTi=7MDUAfjJb697uRwrrxB-4v5fQ3A@mail.gmail.com> <BANLkTi=AeC1oLNGFwUWs0Yp_JNEKcaSsag@mail.gmail.com> <BANLkTinNtJiq4JH5qvf36kiKmFtAQArvAA@mail.gmail.com> <4DC60610.3040606@gmail.com> <BANLkTinwSxG3=3eSnKjvFSB1k7fYOEKwPg@mail.gmail.com> <4DC61E3C.5080307@gmail.com> <BANLkTin=tyc+rUy=RvqCJ9r34j90v1nSGg@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <BANLkTin=tyc+rUy=RvqCJ9r34j90v1nSGg@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: [vwrap] The <embed> tag... is the group still interested in LLSD or DSD?
X-BeenThere: vwrap@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Virtual World Region Agent Protocol - IETF working group <vwrap.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/vwrap>, <mailto:vwrap-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/vwrap>
List-Post: <mailto:vwrap@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:vwrap-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/vwrap>, <mailto:vwrap-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 08 May 2011 11:53:44 -0000

Morgaine, please provide exact text here in the list of what you want 
updated. There are already enough motion to keep scalar data as scalar.

If that alone is too hard to comprehend, then your "designing for the 
future" ignores complete backward compatibility and the many 
implementations that already exist. My last post is only on topic of the 
IETF interest even if merely stated in the obvious truths, just not in 
words you could twist so easily.

We only need simple agreement/disagreements, not staged assignments. 
Because of that alone, I can't take you seriously on any scale, even 
when the scope is pushed completely to the limits.

Please, just provide your draft-adt-00... so we can focus on consensus 
and scale.

-- 
--- https://twitter.com/Dzonatas_Sol ---
Web Development, Software Engineering, Virtual Reality, Consultant