IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [vwrap] Technical basis for VW client in a web browser?

Dzonatas Sol <dzonatas@gmail.com> Tue, 08 February 2011 03:27 UTC

Return-Path: <dzonatas@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: vwrap@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: vwrap@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 393043A6BB8 for <vwrap@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 7 Feb 2011 19:27:02 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id CJ8iDoisgGEw for <vwrap@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 7 Feb 2011 19:27:00 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-iy0-f172.google.com (mail-iy0-f172.google.com [209.85.210.172]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 754393A6BAB for <vwrap@ietf.org>; Mon, 7 Feb 2011 19:27:00 -0800 (PST)
Received: by iym1 with SMTP id 1so5233761iym.31 for <vwrap@ietf.org>; Mon, 07 Feb 2011 19:27:06 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to :cc:subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=1QhS9j8crWpApZZRyYPZD00LW3WGsVhbehpAOK9gdYs=; b=E3mlnp/4ucg9cshIeRAMbsR8oax3tibZSZ7to1RJnr1azFqj1ooZWpcXv785vMfCPi YYntK+63FBl7kBOptej0mdg0D4eDqQHUWfLg25gbfogfPtEPMHxUNsU0yW1e9ffRRz/W qhryT0QyZB3+NnjX9kkbtw4/z44Y+ln8NnRCU=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject :references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=izxztrQ1+r40xw/2sr+8GTGsqiXDmphA0GNk+X9aRYHjno1X730j+Ny0EgEcbkRJ9N xvpMyc+AkCxFTNmVnuavmeGreN/eeV07dALe/fpC7HswqlsZXWBYCGlM4iGtrB7TPGII Dns0lON5dxn7Q4pZHxV5l/Exv4TdeMNv6ZJSQ=
Received: by 10.42.227.8 with SMTP id iy8mr19401490icb.440.1297135626120; Mon, 07 Feb 2011 19:27:06 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [192.168.0.50] (adsl-70-133-68-73.dsl.scrm01.sbcglobal.net [70.133.68.73]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id 8sm4337059iba.10.2011.02.07.19.27.01 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Mon, 07 Feb 2011 19:27:03 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <4D4E1313.3070706@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 05 Feb 2011 19:18:43 -0800
From: Dzonatas Sol <dzonatas@gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla-Thunderbird 2.0.0.24 (X11/20100329)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Morgaine <morgaine.dinova@googlemail.com>
References: <AANLkTintjQdAS=EWfiRu3oWenB42LKsNzJPDJ+5ofBRO@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTintjQdAS=EWfiRu3oWenB42LKsNzJPDJ+5ofBRO@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Cc: vwrap@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [vwrap] Technical basis for VW client in a web browser?
X-BeenThere: vwrap@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Virtual World Region Agent Protocol - IETF working group <vwrap.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/vwrap>, <mailto:vwrap-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/vwrap>
List-Post: <mailto:vwrap@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:vwrap-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/vwrap>, <mailto:vwrap-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 08 Feb 2011 03:27:02 -0000

Maybe developers have realized that large platform-style development is 
not fast enough for today's market with many more brands. No longer can 
we expect the handful of brands we had in the past to program against. 
Eventually, they'll get the idea to write for a virtual machine that 
doesn't do everything yet enough to manipulate the UI in needs possible. 
Every VM made (and built-into viewers/browsers) has had years of 
security issues and monolithic problems.

Virtualization on the motherboard let's concepts be easily shared with 
hand-held devices. That may sound OT easily when not appreciated the 
same as VW... but city on the chip is no new publishment.

Morgaine wrote:
> Has anyone seen a well argued technical assessment supporting the 
> concept of "VW client in a browser"?
>
> I would be very interested to read such an article or post.� 
> Everything I've read so far doesn't hold up at all technically, and 
> just highlights the huge impedance mismatch.
>
>
> Morgaine.
>
>
>
>
> ========================================
>
> On Thu, Dec 2, 2010 at 4:14 PM, Richard L. Barnes <rbarnes@bbn.com 
> <mailto:rbarnes@bbn.com>> wrote:
>
>     Folks on this list are probably better plugged in to this stuff
>     than I am, but in case people hadn't heard: Earlier this week,
>     Katalabs released a virtual world based on WebSockets and WebGL.
>
>     <http://www.katalabs.com/blog/2010/11/30/kataspace-released/>
>     <http://arstechnica.com/open-source/news/2010/12/kataspace-browser-based-virtual-world-built-with-webgl-and-html5.ars>
>     _______________________________________________
>     vwrap mailing list
>     vwrap@ietf.org <mailto:vwrap@ietf.org>
>     https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/vwrap
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> vwrap mailing list
> vwrap@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/vwrap
>   


-- 
--- https://twitter.com/Dzonatas_Sol ---
Web Development, Software Engineering, Virtual Reality, Consultant

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email