IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: Support (as co-author)

Job Snijders <job@ntt.net> Mon, 25 November 2019 18:14 UTC

Return-Path: <job@instituut.net>
X-Original-To: wgchairs@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: wgchairs@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 756EB120B8E for <wgchairs@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 25 Nov 2019 10:14:25 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.649
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.649 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.249, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001, UNPARSEABLE_RELAY=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Ytr7GNropWHw for <wgchairs@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 25 Nov 2019 10:14:24 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-wm1-f51.google.com (mail-wm1-f51.google.com [209.85.128.51]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DDCFF120B8B for <wgchairs@ietf.org>; Mon, 25 Nov 2019 10:14:11 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-wm1-f51.google.com with SMTP id z19so321772wmk.3 for <wgchairs@ietf.org>; Mon, 25 Nov 2019 10:14:11 -0800 (PST)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=F2KiPN0SNXkqBuSHhBCy+FN3MTD8MKr6nzF6u2AMufs=; b=ESRzl2UqG1toaWP5ijUi4c0PJmnP5w80LluRuwAg480u0mlZv+jKStuZsbTjD+xoo6 fh2xF6DrISD+9WhHD0W56exmCrMiyIk0u9YSoOmCFACchcsLPrSECUgPN9fLuGFaGteP g5nBaMJOQAC3j5o103KOaz0/UFej1Z9WMK3OZ6slOJ10vTvZyGyy7LUxS50hNpk9o/CT YGijg+Ac8jZ3E1RAF1XVg090MYMuPczU4q0DvA7HqiZW1G4dbn8clZh6nMkVcRy1USn3 Q8wBKZgk+G+9jqJC6OI51lHA86/Co8a0a2c0M1MAKUgCCX4lj0mmMd2hY8qvJRd+vqc7 yMMw==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAUHsq3o+q9ky7TGVvgx4WhK+DAEtRinbFZbu/JAHdbchocGdMom jkROFiRE493OoY6M/kMxRjFK3k4hO9rZnQ==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqzUAd5c/QDEGu1bJDUYmypGDo5ZmghrShS/bKD5pHSioH30ss45uwxfRdcIW/bnpLx+rhKU4A==
X-Received: by 2002:a1c:2d49:: with SMTP id t70mr138975wmt.131.1574705649580; Mon, 25 Nov 2019 10:14:09 -0800 (PST)
Received: from vurt.meerval.net ([31.161.185.46]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id l4sm133429wme.4.2019.11.25.10.14.05 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-CHACHA20-POLY1305 bits=256/256); Mon, 25 Nov 2019 10:14:07 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost (vurt.meerval.net [local]) by vurt.meerval.net (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTPA id 81d8730a; Mon, 25 Nov 2019 18:14:01 +0000 (UTC)
Date: Mon, 25 Nov 2019 18:13:59 +0000
From: Job Snijders <job@ntt.net>
To: Benoit Claise <bclaise@cisco.com>
Cc: WG Chairs <wgchairs@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: Support (as co-author)
Message-ID: <20191125181359.GA66375@vurt.meerval.net>
References: <5871efb6-9fa7-a06a-e201-fb9fba04935e@cisco.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <5871efb6-9fa7-a06a-e201-fb9fba04935e@cisco.com>
X-Clacks-Overhead: GNU Terry Pratchett
User-Agent: Mutt/1.12.2 (2019-09-21)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/wgchairs/hfg1_VxFfhHlIhZv-dMcwRgiqrI>
X-BeenThere: wgchairs@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Working Group Chairs <wgchairs.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/wgchairs>, <mailto:wgchairs-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/wgchairs/>
List-Post: <mailto:wgchairs@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:wgchairs-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/wgchairs>, <mailto:wgchairs-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 25 Nov 2019 18:14:25 -0000

On Mon, Nov 25, 2019 at 04:09:44PM +0100, Benoit Claise wrote:
> Along the years, I witnessed a trend, which intensifies with time: "I
> support the adoption of this draft (as a co-author)."
> Well, if someone is a co-author, implicitly this person wants the draft to
> progress. Therefore, such as message carries no weight IMO.
> Is it time for the WG chairs to start correcting this behaviour, or at least
> setting the right expectations?
> 
> ex: https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ippm/?q=Adoption%20Call%20for%20draft-ioamteam-ippm-ioam-direct-export

What problem is being solved by "correcting" people? Even if the
interpretation is "well doh, you are a co-author", it still shows the
authors are engaged and willing to push for publication.

If e-mail volume via IETF mailing lists is the issue, there may be other
ways to cut down on noise.

Kind regards,

Job

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email