Re: [dmarc-ietf] Which DKIM(s) should be reported? (Ticket #38)Re: [dmarc-ietf] Which DKIM(s) should be reported? (Ticket #38)
Alessandro Vesely
2021-01-27
dmarc
/arch/msg/dmarc/JoC3wGgDpTlrjqgMuLSLYN9r0DM/
2990092
1935537
Re: [dmarc-ietf] Forensic report loops are a problemRe: [dmarc-ietf] Forensic report loops are a problem
Alessandro Vesely
2021-01-27
dmarc
/arch/msg/dmarc/IXK_c3NXyuj9wKfwe5y7FgJN3J4/
2990084
1933811
Re: [dmarc-ietf] Which DKIM(s) should be reported? (Ticket #38)Re: [dmarc-ietf] Which DKIM(s) should be reported? (Ticket #38)
Douglas Foster
2021-01-27
dmarc
/arch/msg/dmarc/90VoFX7k8Rlo37T1FpLhaZurdVs/
2990080
1935537
Re: [dmarc-ietf] nit in section 7.2Re: [dmarc-ietf] nit in section 7.2
Alessandro Vesely
2021-01-27
dmarc
/arch/msg/dmarc/XgeFVCLw-D_U4Yo-zMS7aaUCEfo/
2990067
1935891
Re: [dmarc-ietf] Ticket #1 - SPF alignmentRe: [dmarc-ietf] Ticket #1 - SPF alignment
Alessandro Vesely
2021-01-27
dmarc
/arch/msg/dmarc/FY14MkuV-q5OUpvFkw07MA1x_zM/
2990057
1928000
Re: [dmarc-ietf] Which DKIM(s) should be reported? (Ticket #38)Re: [dmarc-ietf] Which DKIM(s) should be reported? (Ticket #38)
Douglas Foster
2021-01-27
dmarc
/arch/msg/dmarc/ZizryHXH7hB0RpJ5b_ggRAcOVe8/
2989983
1935537
Re: [dmarc-ietf] Ticket #1 - SPF alignmentRe: [dmarc-ietf] Ticket #1 - SPF alignment
Scott Kitterman
2021-01-26
dmarc
/arch/msg/dmarc/TZxs-XYagma9legYySanjsXglIg/
2989834
1928000
Re: [dmarc-ietf] attack on reportsRe: [dmarc-ietf] attack on reports
Michael Thomas
2021-01-26
dmarc
/arch/msg/dmarc/f7TB6DIHMnQlaey9R5JwnUBBPHU/
2989832
1935876
Re: [dmarc-ietf] attack on reportsRe: [dmarc-ietf] attack on reports
Todd Herr
2021-01-26
dmarc
/arch/msg/dmarc/5loxtGAsgg6PWMFs9dGXK-fwtks/
2989818
1935876
Re: [dmarc-ietf] attack on reportsRe: [dmarc-ietf] attack on reports
Michael Thomas
2021-01-26
dmarc
/arch/msg/dmarc/OI43fAGg-tZrwBe5QXa0KrDhiR4/
2989811
1935876
Re: [dmarc-ietf] attack on reportsRe: [dmarc-ietf] attack on reports
Michael Thomas
2021-01-26
dmarc
/arch/msg/dmarc/6OBadflzsavUkBDGzuut8Zg87aY/
2989808
1935876
Re: [dmarc-ietf] attack on reportsRe: [dmarc-ietf] attack on reports
Michael Thomas
2021-01-26
dmarc
/arch/msg/dmarc/Yd6s-9yzQoE6C5j2LT45j9KUvF0/
2989806
1935876
Re: [dmarc-ietf] attack on reportsRe: [dmarc-ietf] attack on reports
Michael Thomas
2021-01-26
dmarc
/arch/msg/dmarc/swR6_PB6RRmqzm-tQPaFEYLKMuI/
2989804
1935876
Re: [dmarc-ietf] attack on reportsRe: [dmarc-ietf] attack on reports
Steven M Jones
2021-01-26
dmarc
/arch/msg/dmarc/VgQFCVPheTkWMqiUC2wDBk68cdU/
2989794
1935876
Re: [dmarc-ietf] attack on reportsRe: [dmarc-ietf] attack on reports
Matt V
2021-01-26
dmarc
/arch/msg/dmarc/4et8YT2Yfoso7-y1WFgMtqhqG9M/
2989783
1935876
Re: [dmarc-ietf] attack on reportsRe: [dmarc-ietf] attack on reports
Todd Herr
2021-01-26
dmarc
/arch/msg/dmarc/zmpIk1Z3AZPkpaD26wAIjegA7_4/
2989781
1935876
Re: [dmarc-ietf] attack on reportsRe: [dmarc-ietf] attack on reports
Michael Thomas
2021-01-26
dmarc
/arch/msg/dmarc/pGtjpvMBawPeTybCUeiwLAEXwco/
2989778
1935876
Re: [dmarc-ietf] attack on reportsRe: [dmarc-ietf] attack on reports
Todd Herr
2021-01-26
dmarc
/arch/msg/dmarc/PkcfzgGbc3pcgKmKVnyvZWa5Kfg/
2989773
1935876
Re: [dmarc-ietf] attack on reportsRe: [dmarc-ietf] attack on reports
Michael Thomas
2021-01-26
dmarc
/arch/msg/dmarc/LgGs2clJLL2AA4HjciUsCLUR3CM/
2989758
1935876
[dmarc-ietf] understanding section 7.2[dmarc-ietf] understanding section 7.2
Michael Thomas
2021-01-26
dmarc
/arch/msg/dmarc/XOABlenK3yX5LiOOU4ss2B2Bmh4/
2989748
1935894
[dmarc-ietf] nit in section 7.2[dmarc-ietf] nit in section 7.2
Michael Thomas
2021-01-26
dmarc
/arch/msg/dmarc/lItL3BGKk3ZFlwMSXhDqK9UnUnQ/
2989742
1935891
Re: [dmarc-ietf] attack on reportsRe: [dmarc-ietf] attack on reports
Todd Herr
2021-01-26
dmarc
/arch/msg/dmarc/hTgEkC59rIQACbqon0jwNN1KmMI/
2989738
1935876
Re: [dmarc-ietf] attack on reportsRe: [dmarc-ietf] attack on reports
Michael Thomas
2021-01-26
dmarc
/arch/msg/dmarc/UFAa5e0F4K47kGdwE8OAHwZ9EQg/
2989716
1935876
Re: [dmarc-ietf] Ticket #42 - Expand DMARC reporting URI functionalityRe: [dmarc-ietf] Ticket #42 - Expand DMARC reporting URI functionality
John R Levine
2021-01-26
dmarc
/arch/msg/dmarc/2uqe2xlhEcUU6xxO32RDDagXtfo/
2989710
1928001
Re: [dmarc-ietf] attack on reportsRe: [dmarc-ietf] attack on reports
Alessandro Vesely
2021-01-26
dmarc
/arch/msg/dmarc/KzbI3hGzX4ravBEEBXigNfEDV9M/
2989709
1935876
Re: [dmarc-ietf] Ticket #42 - Expand DMARC reporting URI functionalityRe: [dmarc-ietf] Ticket #42 - Expand DMARC reporting URI functionality
Michael Thomas
2021-01-26
dmarc
/arch/msg/dmarc/YNp_ODBrzefPAASX9TmrIRtYMQI/
2989702
1928001
Re: [dmarc-ietf] Ticket #42 - Expand DMARC reporting URI functionalityRe: [dmarc-ietf] Ticket #42 - Expand DMARC reporting URI functionality
Alessandro Vesely
2021-01-26
dmarc
/arch/msg/dmarc/G4JgW__IJaM3euKpl6eHJ409nZM/
2989699
1928001
[dmarc-ietf] attack on reports[dmarc-ietf] attack on reports
Michael Thomas
2021-01-26
dmarc
/arch/msg/dmarc/8e588uxX2eOmG5VQhbACUteQLNo/
2989698
1935876
Re: [dmarc-ietf] Ticket #42 - Expand DMARC reporting URI functionalityRe: [dmarc-ietf] Ticket #42 - Expand DMARC reporting URI functionality
Murray S. Kucherawy
2021-01-26
dmarc
/arch/msg/dmarc/qRowKcYqh-LvIkV0mITmFNDkpbk/
2989697
1928001
Re: [dmarc-ietf] Ticket #42 - Expand DMARC reporting URI functionalityRe: [dmarc-ietf] Ticket #42 - Expand DMARC reporting URI functionality
John R Levine
2021-01-26
dmarc
/arch/msg/dmarc/16cRB5LQeJErAdoYAVoiIrIdKNM/
2989694
1928001
Re: [dmarc-ietf] Which DKIM(s) should be reported? (Ticket #38)Re: [dmarc-ietf] Which DKIM(s) should be reported? (Ticket #38)
Alessandro Vesely
2021-01-26
dmarc
/arch/msg/dmarc/Y780zwr-3rx1vDZAbgbqwNmH1cc/
2989686
1935537
Re: [dmarc-ietf] Ticket #1 - SPF alignmentRe: [dmarc-ietf] Ticket #1 - SPF alignment
Alessandro Vesely
2021-01-26
dmarc
/arch/msg/dmarc/pGx2xFxks5LJGy8avUhpeIsSJiQ/
2989675
1928000
Re: [dmarc-ietf] Which DKIM(s) should be reported? (Ticket #38)Re: [dmarc-ietf] Which DKIM(s) should be reported? (Ticket #38)
Douglas Foster
2021-01-26
dmarc
/arch/msg/dmarc/iEdWa3N6Yu_lPJGA0KyZkp5REec/
2989583
1935537
Re: [dmarc-ietf] Ticket #1 - SPF alignmentRe: [dmarc-ietf] Ticket #1 - SPF alignment
Scott Kitterman
2021-01-26
dmarc
/arch/msg/dmarc/zSHatF4EpG8zt8VE2_vvPK9qR50/
2989577
1928000
Re: [dmarc-ietf] Which DKIM(s) should be reported? (Ticket #38)Re: [dmarc-ietf] Which DKIM(s) should be reported? (Ticket #38)
Alessandro Vesely
2021-01-26
dmarc
/arch/msg/dmarc/bYGXi5J6jjhbrYCLwwts2ke5EcQ/
2989573
1935537
Re: [dmarc-ietf] Which DKIM(s) should be reported? (Ticket #38)Re: [dmarc-ietf] Which DKIM(s) should be reported? (Ticket #38)
Douglas Foster
2021-01-26
dmarc
/arch/msg/dmarc/J0gd8YxVJUkjPPEFDLZ60_QEM60/
2989568
1935537
Re: [dmarc-ietf] Ticket #1 - SPF alignmentRe: [dmarc-ietf] Ticket #1 - SPF alignment
Alessandro Vesely
2021-01-26
dmarc
/arch/msg/dmarc/GLLbBuh-yXXHzZi4LNhV56OiqiY/
2989565
1928000
Re: [dmarc-ietf] Ticket #42 - Expand DMARC reporting URI functionalityRe: [dmarc-ietf] Ticket #42 - Expand DMARC reporting URI functionality
Alessandro Vesely
2021-01-26
dmarc
/arch/msg/dmarc/T12XVO3FQ9gOwYZdkjW_-XcHfIE/
2989530
1928001
[dmarc-ietf] Fwd: Reports helping spammers? (#81)[dmarc-ietf] Fwd: Reports helping spammers? (#81)
Douglas Foster
2021-01-26
dmarc
/arch/msg/dmarc/Z6B52tVuOiEBJ2dK35_Ze361tB0/
2989446
1935189
Re: [dmarc-ietf] Tickets 98 and 99 -- fake reports are not a problem and if they were authentication would not helpRe: [dmarc-ietf] Tickets 98 and 99 -- fake reports are not a problem and if they were authentication would not help
Seth Blank
2021-01-25
dmarc
/arch/msg/dmarc/61hgaF9KO676PZuDjFz7i5fPf3I/
2989359
1935546
8569 Messages