Re: [Recentattendees] Background on Singapore go/no go for IETF 100Re: [Recentattendees] Background on Singapore go/no go for IETF 100
Michael StJohns
2017-01-31
ietf
/arch/msg/ietf/_CKqR9tvmN1NwPwLc5L1Kc4jOfI/
2322703
1339031
Re: [Recentattendees] Background on Singapore go/no go for IETF 100Re: [Recentattendees] Background on Singapore go/no go for IETF 100
Yoav Nir
2017-01-31
ietf
/arch/msg/ietf/s4x6-2LbquEfbZgzeRCrJ8KoZ4c/
2322683
1339031
NomCom 2016-2017 - Announcement of IESG selectionsNomCom 2016-2017 - Announcement of IESG selections
NomCom Chair 2016
2017-01-31
ietf
/arch/msg/ietf/smJYEd9_laUG8hs1ToqtSqIHcGw/
2322679
1684646
Re: Review of draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv6-prefix-length-hint-issue-05Re: Review of draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv6-prefix-length-hint-issue-05
tianxiang li
2017-01-31
ietf
/arch/msg/ietf/K3xvqKgobnGLFZIDFYDKS2vy0xQ/
2322660
1684370
Re: [Recentattendees] Background on Singapore go/no go for IETF 100Re: [Recentattendees] Background on Singapore go/no go for IETF 100
Eggert, Lars
2017-01-31
ietf
/arch/msg/ietf/QotSVdEtNMP2OQoCNSGHpEhJOwY/
2322657
1339031
Re: [Recentattendees] Background on Singapore go/no go for IETF 100Re: [Recentattendees] Background on Singapore go/no go for IETF 100
Behcet Sarikaya
2017-01-31
ietf
/arch/msg/ietf/Ra34JqBVTHh_nm8Gil_U2vIweqI/
2322650
1339031
RE: [Recentattendees] Background on Singapore go/no go for IETF 100RE: [Recentattendees] Background on Singapore go/no go for IETF 100
MH Michael Hammer (5304)
2017-01-31
ietf
/arch/msg/ietf/aRsNV0HVuiPJmf5D2WBtGQQ5yC4/
2322598
1339031
Re: [Recentattendees] Background on Singapore go/no go for IETF 100Re: [Recentattendees] Background on Singapore go/no go for IETF 100
JORDI PALET MARTINEZ
2017-01-31
ietf
/arch/msg/ietf/AJjW3G_9ayyZaMhBuZYy79oQ5Y0/
2322594
1339031
Re: [Recentattendees] Background on Singapore go/no go for IETF 100Re: [Recentattendees] Background on Singapore go/no go for IETF 100
Mary B
2017-01-31
ietf
/arch/msg/ietf/Xgi4kNqO-V98tnuKv94x-teSsF8/
2322588
1339031
RE: [Recentattendees] Background on Singapore go/no go for IETF 100RE: [Recentattendees] Background on Singapore go/no go for IETF 100
MH Michael Hammer (5304)
2017-01-31
ietf
/arch/msg/ietf/sDRWzcPV8A1AvunQbv2Q2dqI45U/
2322584
1339031
Re: [Recentattendees] Background on Singapore go/no go for IETF 100Re: [Recentattendees] Background on Singapore go/no go for IETF 100
JORDI PALET MARTINEZ
2017-01-31
ietf
/arch/msg/ietf/c6IS17nul1CEtDnkHVHdMPrfYE0/
2322578
1339031
Re: [Recentattendees] Background on Singapore go/no go for IETF 100Re: [Recentattendees] Background on Singapore go/no go for IETF 100
Yoav Nir
2017-01-31
ietf
/arch/msg/ietf/YF4AdNBZTLTeaKfl4MIRTJ3t49s/
2322569
1339031
Re: [Recentattendees] Background on Singapore go/no go for IETF 100Re: [Recentattendees] Background on Singapore go/no go for IETF 100
Yoav Nir
2017-01-31
ietf
/arch/msg/ietf/98fe1KWz6onf-UdoO98f0fJu6Lo/
2322568
1339031
Re: [Recentattendees] Background on Singapore go/no go for IETF 100Re: [Recentattendees] Background on Singapore go/no go for IETF 100
Christer Holmberg
2017-01-31
ietf
/arch/msg/ietf/uE21nYJH8mNwGurswpRCAbfCY8I/
2322563
1339031
Re: [6tisch] Last Call: <draft-ietf-6tisch-minimal-17.txt> (Minimal 6TiSCH Configuration) to Best Current PracticeRe: [6tisch] Last Call: <draft-ietf-6tisch-minimal-17.txt> (Minimal 6TiSCH Configuration) to Best Current Practice
Ralph Droms
2017-01-31
ietf
/arch/msg/ietf/3iHO6gQikl90V_GbJ1-mR01DWQA/
2322558
1680366
RE: [Recentattendees] Background on Singapore go/no go for IETF 100RE: [Recentattendees] Background on Singapore go/no go for IETF 100
Alexander Nevalennyy
2017-01-31
ietf
/arch/msg/ietf/Rt1DfgQD3tzuTyzAhSmP6e2pOg8/
2322546
1339031
Re: [Recentattendees] Background on Singapore go/no go for IETF 100Re: [Recentattendees] Background on Singapore go/no go for IETF 100
JORDI PALET MARTINEZ
2017-01-31
ietf
/arch/msg/ietf/TsDPPfg_q_U20tFKLPnRvMUtn6E/
2322531
1339031
RE: Last Call: <draft-hardie-privsec-metadata-insertion-05.txt> (Design considerations for Metadata Insertion) to Informational RFCRE: Last Call: <draft-hardie-privsec-metadata-insertion-05.txt> (Design considerations for Metadata Insertion) to Informational RFC
mohamed.boucadair
2017-01-31
ietf
/arch/msg/ietf/IENk5QqISvq3tTOfHam2nomE0ko/
2322528
1684593
RE: [Recentattendees] Background on Singapore go/no go for IETF 100RE: [Recentattendees] Background on Singapore go/no go for IETF 100
Mani, Mehdi
2017-01-31
ietf
/arch/msg/ietf/MuYvTUrf2xuMnmCU32f-tfAXeLQ/
2322527
1339031
Re: [Recentattendees] Background on Singapore go/no go for IETF 100Re: [Recentattendees] Background on Singapore go/no go for IETF 100
Naeem Khademi
2017-01-31
ietf
/arch/msg/ietf/t9sGu4Xdi04vyPh0uLhQ_3mfLWE/
2322523
1339031
Re: If Muslims are blocked by the U.S., should the IETF respond?Re: If Muslims are blocked by the U.S., should the IETF respond?
Jari Arkko
2017-01-31
ietf
/arch/msg/ietf/yyZNwU4epwCFjn8jp5I_sYbjm_Y/
2322513
1684293
Re: [Recentattendees] Background on Singapore go/no go for IETF 100Re: [Recentattendees] Background on Singapore go/no go for IETF 100
JORDI PALET MARTINEZ
2017-01-31
ietf
/arch/msg/ietf/momdVOgl42nH4xVA9HFwN0XH8yg/
2322507
1339031
Re: [Recentattendees] Background on Singapore go/no go for IETF 100Re: [Recentattendees] Background on Singapore go/no go for IETF 100
Mani, Mehdi
2017-01-31
ietf
/arch/msg/ietf/874DSjlAu-REu8Ydg9smNPfmSSA/
2322505
1339031
Re: [Recentattendees] Background on Singapore go/no go for IETF 100Re: [Recentattendees] Background on Singapore go/no go for IETF 100
Mani, Mehdi
2017-01-31
ietf
/arch/msg/ietf/rEHnZdCKEcf8PPFBbOboHwc9pQg/
2322503
1339031
Re: If Muslims are blocked by the U.S., should the IETF respond?Re: If Muslims are blocked by the U.S., should the IETF respond?
Naeem Khademi
2017-01-31
ietf
/arch/msg/ietf/Cljhx84WZWabX2Ju85TPuYs25MQ/
2322502
1684293
Re: If Muslims are blocked by the U.S., should the IETF respond?Re: If Muslims are blocked by the U.S., should the IETF respond?
Jari Arkko
2017-01-31
ietf
/arch/msg/ietf/VyYU1EC3VqYGv_3X7IBYL5hK8fE/
2322493
1684293
Re: [6tisch] Last Call: <draft-ietf-6tisch-minimal-17.txt> (Minimal 6TiSCH Configuration) to Best Current PracticeRe: [6tisch] Last Call: <draft-ietf-6tisch-minimal-17.txt> (Minimal 6TiSCH Configuration) to Best Current Practice
Xavi Vilajosana Guillen
2017-01-31
ietf
/arch/msg/ietf/MgLcXVK4qp160ljitx-2o_Idcb8/
2322484
1680366
Re: If categories of people are blocked by the U.S., should the IETF respond?Re: If categories of people are blocked by the U.S., should the IETF respond?
Matthew Kerwin
2017-01-31
ietf
/arch/msg/ietf/sC_Vk9OqQ0CrH0pO7yNAGpHVVJU/
2322450
1684293
Re: If categories of people are blocked by the U.S., should the IETF respond?Re: If categories of people are blocked by the U.S., should the IETF respond?
Dan Harkins
2017-01-31
ietf
/arch/msg/ietf/nFji65-8s9xy1cnRd1_OSwqCDdw/
2322449
1684293
Re: If Muslims are blocked by the U.S., should the IETF respond?Re: If Muslims are blocked by the U.S., should the IETF respond?
Arturo Servin
2017-01-31
ietf
/arch/msg/ietf/XOXzvn2v8JLU9zLwoaZkJ3wpbsg/
2322424
1684293
Re: If categories of people are blocked by the U.S., should the IETF respond?Re: If categories of people are blocked by the U.S., should the IETF respond?
Randy Bush
2017-01-31
ietf
/arch/msg/ietf/Uf6y9rCVYed6M77m6H6V7eL99TQ/
2322423
1684293
Re: If categories of people are blocked by the U.S., should the IETF respond?Re: If categories of people are blocked by the U.S., should the IETF respond?
Dan Harkins
2017-01-31
ietf
/arch/msg/ietf/ognWXlNeE1c7hbjj6YgyXH5D-IQ/
2322420
1684293
Re: If Muslims are blocked by the U.S., should the IETF respond?Re: If Muslims are blocked by the U.S., should the IETF respond?
Alejandro Acosta
2017-01-31
ietf
/arch/msg/ietf/F-SUYEivFnsLUnlzOnHO7f9bgps/
2322393
1684293
Re: If categories of people are blocked by the U.S., should the IETF respond?Re: If categories of people are blocked by the U.S., should the IETF respond?
Randy Bush
2017-01-30
ietf
/arch/msg/ietf/EUnlgKzvb2wcHi8KvE9_vhZOp1s/
2322368
1684293
Re: If Muslims are blocked by the U.S., should the IETF respond?Re: If Muslims are blocked by the U.S., should the IETF respond?
Brian E Carpenter
2017-01-30
ietf
/arch/msg/ietf/wS8SKltWyADcXMCu8VixGkRoR5Q/
2322367
1684293
RE: [dhcwg] [Int-dir] Review of draft-ietf-dhc-relay-server-security-02RE: [dhcwg] [Int-dir] Review of draft-ietf-dhc-relay-server-security-02
Bernie Volz (volz)
2017-01-30
ietf
/arch/msg/ietf/PVkoyr6RI1Hf9GpVrs4NHwVB-B0/
2322355
1684116
Re: [dhcwg] [Int-dir] Review of draft-ietf-dhc-relay-server-security-02Re: [dhcwg] [Int-dir] Review of draft-ietf-dhc-relay-server-security-02
Ted Lemon
2017-01-30
ietf
/arch/msg/ietf/uOjXJg-HwRHumnopENwCr649UO8/
2322344
1684116
Re: [dhcwg] [Int-dir] Review of draft-ietf-dhc-relay-server-security-02Re: [dhcwg] [Int-dir] Review of draft-ietf-dhc-relay-server-security-02
jouni.nospam
2017-01-30
ietf
/arch/msg/ietf/5QMCEPoPaQSdifgtfX2hhkGCpdc/
2322329
1684116
Re: If Muslims are blocked by the U.S., should the IETF respond?Re: If Muslims are blocked by the U.S., should the IETF respond?
Emily Shepherd
2017-01-30
ietf
/arch/msg/ietf/cgFAmojW6i-_x009kfz1SOlCdSQ/
2322316
1684293
Re: If Muslims are blocked by the U.S., should the IETF respond?Re: If Muslims are blocked by the U.S., should the IETF respond?
Phillip Hallam-Baker
2017-01-30
ietf
/arch/msg/ietf/SaTbpt61Itp3HvMcybVB2wn8lts/
2322315
1684293
132404 Messages