Re: Adoption call criteria for CRH? [was: Re: CRH and RH0]Re: Adoption call criteria for CRH? [was: Re: CRH and RH0]
Darren Dukes (ddukes)
2020-05-14
ipv6
/arch/msg/ipv6/emQ3Sj_l4fWXErZY_nhQAbYxr5Y/
2879175
1894603
Re: Do we really need to add state into each packet ...Re: Do we really need to add state into each packet ...
Robert Raszuk
2020-05-14
ipv6
/arch/msg/ipv6/jnrG0AEZF2OjOgWJCRzZRdrH_pM/
2879158
1894834
RE: Adoption call criteria for CRH? [was: Re: CRH and RH0]RE: Adoption call criteria for CRH? [was: Re: CRH and RH0]
Pengshuping (Peng Shuping)
2020-05-14
ipv6
/arch/msg/ipv6/aO0MdyDZci2k58cV0W0gzoa1o-c/
2879122
1894603
RE: Do we really need to add state into each packet ...RE: Do we really need to add state into each packet ...
Andrew Alston
2020-05-14
ipv6
/arch/msg/ipv6/7imLj9Z3I_JMYaYaLL7pb-9YAKM/
2879089
1894834
Re: Do we really need to add state into each packet ...Re: Do we really need to add state into each packet ...
Gyan Mishra
2020-05-14
ipv6
/arch/msg/ipv6/ODSp-BtaO5At_bEqMBaiXM_nADE/
2879081
1894834
RE: Do we really need to add state into each packet ...RE: Do we really need to add state into each packet ...
Andrew Alston
2020-05-14
ipv6
/arch/msg/ipv6/VuvYe5UARMJS1AaANDQDNzs23kg/
2879070
1894834
RE: Adoption call criteria for CRH? [was: Re: CRH and RH0]RE: Adoption call criteria for CRH? [was: Re: CRH and RH0]
Ketan Talaulikar (ketant)
2020-05-14
ipv6
/arch/msg/ipv6/rCZ0HcH009qq4uW4m5VxkT5twNg/
2879067
1894603
RE: CRH and RH0RE: CRH and RH0
Ron Bonica
2020-05-14
ipv6
/arch/msg/ipv6/OG3XDVKUYVYaLP3F2T6E1NK3uOQ/
2879004
1894603
Re: Do we really need to add state into each packet ...Re: Do we really need to add state into each packet ...
Gyan Mishra
2020-05-14
ipv6
/arch/msg/ipv6/5KrkURPXuppRGa1X9vfxjKiyEug/
2879003
1894834
Re: Do we really need to add state into each packet ...Re: Do we really need to add state into each packet ...
Gyan Mishra
2020-05-14
ipv6
/arch/msg/ipv6/P00PCJ8ndWgk8OhoWmr7ROwM_QQ/
2878990
1894834
Re: CRH and RH0Re: CRH and RH0
Tom Herbert
2020-05-14
ipv6
/arch/msg/ipv6/HZ0FNnZqJXQzrEYQD7SPAr-GhP8/
2878976
1894603
Re: Do we really need to add state into each packet ...Re: Do we really need to add state into each packet ...
Uma Chunduri
2020-05-13
ipv6
/arch/msg/ipv6/wgCCDYbTP80VG2ScQxMUAdbgavE/
2878949
1894834
Re: Adoption call criteria for CRH? [was: Re: CRH and RH0]Re: Adoption call criteria for CRH? [was: Re: CRH and RH0]
S Moonesamy
2020-05-13
ipv6
/arch/msg/ipv6/3C0euV-ujJh0vSaQL38CKdumuz4/
2878944
1894603
Re: Adoption call criteria for CRH? [was: Re: CRH and RH0]Re: Adoption call criteria for CRH? [was: Re: CRH and RH0]
Bob Hinden
2020-05-13
ipv6
/arch/msg/ipv6/om420e7EBf-vrfFlb5zq7P9CWw0/
2878940
1894603
Re: Adoption call criteria for CRH? [was: Re: CRH and RH0]Re: Adoption call criteria for CRH? [was: Re: CRH and RH0]
Bob Hinden
2020-05-13
ipv6
/arch/msg/ipv6/cfPTVnt_A8y8L0lvkpJAqa7alW8/
2878935
1894603
Re: Adoption call criteria for CRH? [was: Re: CRH and RH0]Re: Adoption call criteria for CRH? [was: Re: CRH and RH0]
John Scudder
2020-05-13
ipv6
/arch/msg/ipv6/hSS2hFDLzWHUCiFcbNZQDxZKD28/
2878922
1894603
Re: Do we really need to add state into each packet ...Re: Do we really need to add state into each packet ...
Robert Raszuk
2020-05-13
ipv6
/arch/msg/ipv6/3LdORdqmXnmo7fxTR-8jGEYRsbs/
2878916
1894834
Re: Adoption call criteria for CRH? [was: Re: CRH and RH0]Re: Adoption call criteria for CRH? [was: Re: CRH and RH0]
Brian E Carpenter
2020-05-13
ipv6
/arch/msg/ipv6/EnTkPgYJx6kCS41xgupk6u5YS3w/
2878915
1894603
Re: CRH and RH0Re: CRH and RH0
Darren Dukes (ddukes)
2020-05-13
ipv6
/arch/msg/ipv6/L8kVLCuxNBptiI2cONI32U8jjGM/
2878908
1894603
Re: Adoption call criteria for CRH? [was: Re: CRH and RH0]Re: Adoption call criteria for CRH? [was: Re: CRH and RH0]
Joel M. Halpern
2020-05-13
ipv6
/arch/msg/ipv6/CmK0bLibJA-UA52EZQgGBlIoTyI/
2878906
1894603
Re: Do we really need to add state into each packet ...Re: Do we really need to add state into each packet ...
Brian E Carpenter
2020-05-13
ipv6
/arch/msg/ipv6/5IS8VJxiHwOHjPa4250FSqyvhI4/
2878898
1894834
Re: FW: New Version Notification for draft-bonica-6man-comp-rtg-hdr-18.txtRe: FW: New Version Notification for draft-bonica-6man-comp-rtg-hdr-18.txt
Joel M. Halpern
2020-05-13
ipv6
/arch/msg/ipv6/_9WhXUI7UCTkx3ac4Cd00zYSLJQ/
2878897
1894853
Re: Adoption call criteria for CRH? [was: Re: CRH and RH0]Re: Adoption call criteria for CRH? [was: Re: CRH and RH0]
Darren Dukes (ddukes)
2020-05-13
ipv6
/arch/msg/ipv6/OUuaApUMoxLPC3OyMzIt9n8IKx4/
2878895
1894603
Re: FW: New Version Notification for draft-bonica-6man-comp-rtg-hdr-18.txtRe: FW: New Version Notification for draft-bonica-6man-comp-rtg-hdr-18.txt
Robert Raszuk
2020-05-13
ipv6
/arch/msg/ipv6/LGnbYIv6B4ZoEKrsGp4RHRyO1pA/
2878893
1894853
FW: New Version Notification for draft-bonica-6man-comp-rtg-hdr-18.txtFW: New Version Notification for draft-bonica-6man-comp-rtg-hdr-18.txt
Ron Bonica
2020-05-13
ipv6
/arch/msg/ipv6/c7W6m7GuE8dnaUBj9Qpb0h21FFI/
2878878
1894853
Re: Adoption call criteria for CRH? [was: Re: CRH and RH0]Re: Adoption call criteria for CRH? [was: Re: CRH and RH0]
Brian E Carpenter
2020-05-13
ipv6
/arch/msg/ipv6/s_C3yNXYD523QqS7jXQTLtR2nAs/
2878874
1894603
Re: Adoption call criteria for CRH? [was: Re: CRH and RH0]Re: Adoption call criteria for CRH? [was: Re: CRH and RH0]
S Moonesamy
2020-05-13
ipv6
/arch/msg/ipv6/4y0gfqx0k6txL0OE8H-ORi1JniE/
2878865
1894603
Re: CRH and RH0Re: CRH and RH0
Gyan Mishra
2020-05-13
ipv6
/arch/msg/ipv6/PAUopzCax9R7e2nZGhx6xxNNi3c/
2878860
1894603
RE: CRH and RH0RE: CRH and RH0
Ron Bonica
2020-05-13
ipv6
/arch/msg/ipv6/H9xYvdHSMdluGqrLg6BsVWmmIKg/
2878859
1894603
RE: CRH and RH0RE: CRH and RH0
Ron Bonica
2020-05-13
ipv6
/arch/msg/ipv6/X13yRHm7OqOZ3q6dkCqzjYjs8Wc/
2878845
1894603
Re: CRH and RH0Re: CRH and RH0
Robert Raszuk
2020-05-13
ipv6
/arch/msg/ipv6/aglgpjdVNwGQnuTtV_RbvJpKlaU/
2878837
1894603
Re: Adoption call criteria for CRH? [was: Re: CRH and RH0]Re: Adoption call criteria for CRH? [was: Re: CRH and RH0]
Robert Raszuk
2020-05-13
ipv6
/arch/msg/ipv6/rib8e2DB5P7lnA2E_0czgg12ee4/
2878835
1894603
Re: CRH and RH0Re: CRH and RH0
Mark Smith
2020-05-13
ipv6
/arch/msg/ipv6/IwkSShNgZNPCV9COy6TUv5fCF3M/
2878834
1894603
Adoption call criteria for CRH? [was: Re: CRH and RH0]Adoption call criteria for CRH? [was: Re: CRH and RH0]
John Scudder
2020-05-13
ipv6
/arch/msg/ipv6/jNM5sifnznqglW4xYAWYX73wlwg/
2878825
1894603
RE: CRH and RH0RE: CRH and RH0
Ron Bonica
2020-05-13
ipv6
/arch/msg/ipv6/AlUN9Z54WsdEDOfGQ1bh--0M1to/
2878821
1894603
Re: Other use cases for header insertion (was Re: Header Insertion and TI-FA)Re: Other use cases for header insertion (was Re: Header Insertion and TI-FA)
Fernando Gont
2020-05-13
ipv6
/arch/msg/ipv6/wIPCPoPDcAIcYhQFQ57d00ymTNI/
2878811
1894358
Do we really need to add state into each packet ...Do we really need to add state into each packet ...
Robert Raszuk
2020-05-13
ipv6
/arch/msg/ipv6/zmI6SA2GfHc_gt54xhVevOJvWsQ/
2878810
1894834
FW: New Version Notification for draft-bonica-6man-comp-rtg-hdr-17.txtFW: New Version Notification for draft-bonica-6man-comp-rtg-hdr-17.txt
Ron Bonica
2020-05-13
ipv6
/arch/msg/ipv6/qzs2Esj2Asc7pPIfwrADuQSNsz0/
2878803
1894833
Re: Other use cases for header insertion (was Re: Header Insertion and TI-FA)Re: Other use cases for header insertion (was Re: Header Insertion and TI-FA)
Uma Chunduri
2020-05-13
ipv6
/arch/msg/ipv6/AzJ1uIXhASboHbBRYIf_PlUadL8/
2878802
1894358
RE: CRH and RH0RE: CRH and RH0
Ketan Talaulikar (ketant)
2020-05-13
ipv6
/arch/msg/ipv6/IgZW26kzJX2iO37964lVxbe04Ww/
2878786
1894603