IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: Adoption call criteria for CRH? [was: Re: CRH and RH0]

Bob Hinden <bob.hinden@gmail.com> Wed, 13 May 2020 23:03 UTC

Return-Path: <bob.hinden@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 18EB93A076C; Wed, 13 May 2020 16:03:12 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.098
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.098 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id IsvFWU92qxnq; Wed, 13 May 2020 16:03:09 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-wr1-x42b.google.com (mail-wr1-x42b.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::42b]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5CC3A3A0765; Wed, 13 May 2020 16:03:09 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-wr1-x42b.google.com with SMTP id j5so1533056wrq.2; Wed, 13 May 2020 16:03:09 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=from:message-id:mime-version:subject:date:in-reply-to:cc:to :references; bh=E+6gnecI3kA3eBdBChafCUG7r1thFNAzr0AGIQjHUP8=; b=gW06M8WrdgbdHik+pnxKM2YUJEjwp3Yj+b6KS6p6/41b6xwa+fwkhU0vccwBNU4RPH Vk61a5JgZ0NwVVNk6UYGzWwxn66v8p9gTgyxaoj3Q8d/ycOqhzD7lFNgKo+Ey6q5zFzs u9WKkqzl49T4eH5BdChM5Z+rFj82nwBhIWqxdWqLR3lj9bpzpj7gH2ua8vVCE5l0ogoF 9zpFTcP2XrLhd7hZfKD1YRNHhi4bWF6G0rjVTwBYDk2vZqAsX0PV1UsXlVSURWOjhtsp +OOs7lGPYnuvDqnk/flVgFmduCcSacYI5pPzHSuHKKOiaozFZtn1BVXz6lXQMzqd5/hM 3dYw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:message-id:mime-version:subject:date :in-reply-to:cc:to:references; bh=E+6gnecI3kA3eBdBChafCUG7r1thFNAzr0AGIQjHUP8=; b=Il8+W8EDE/s/FxqwEWOEwsWQpLYBRpkJy71YblrVIvmJaGLDKMNPC6dvzjlE78ge9H cRgc9UZx+ypEIYVM+82qV/WtM/ec1/YZuxEUksYFCIutezV40PJKksoYTrGXMNtxAX5h WcsH4KrVwEISqw7fnJIu+NSmKOSYd+h3LKcGfzmDv5mSX6nkYxiPh9Xz/dSlSvnqE9Gi DYydOzYjtMZGBaZe2lt+aRAMOvXBjSv/Ug0bQ8IKLiBnu0+IVu194pViEyGis/Vi5C9H 4M5wYmJ6I+mKSUPv0yAKJq3Fd6+ErsFe8UaLf4/JQB9qau80yV4s1OMwGLuXMeXmTT7i PJtQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533u/i5HVp4e0kwdVZ4AmziOOygHw3Q68aQ8T/IpnV3+zMPnUern iUZ+JtKmvFigBhrjg5otdcA=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzy1+bwFhBhD4wYme4hZvrk+9dsu8GeU2z9/Jn14kMexJbmL7zmHprCwhqNwm1VGxdY9Siylw==
X-Received: by 2002:adf:806e:: with SMTP id 101mr1832077wrk.225.1589410987759; Wed, 13 May 2020 16:03:07 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ?IPv6:2601:647:5a00:ef0b:a8ee:1611:4a33:248? ([2601:647:5a00:ef0b:a8ee:1611:4a33:248]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id o15sm782357wrw.65.2020.05.13.16.03.05 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-ECDSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 13 May 2020 16:03:06 -0700 (PDT)
From: Bob Hinden <bob.hinden@gmail.com>
Message-Id: <2782613A-0D2B-4F62-AD73-EA41928F6E32@gmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_7338726F-1084-4F80-8688-1D1E303F33D0"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg="pgp-sha512"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 12.4 \(3445.104.14\))
Subject: Re: Adoption call criteria for CRH? [was: Re: CRH and RH0]
Date: Wed, 13 May 2020 16:03:01 -0700
In-Reply-To: <6.2.5.6.2.20200513133654.0f5815d8@elandnews.com>
Cc: Bob Hinden <bob.hinden@gmail.com>, 6man-chairs@ietf.org, 6man@ietf.org
To: S Moonesamy <sm+ietf@elandsys.com>
References: <DM6PR05MB6348E9AD1E088792C2F10BB4AEBF0@DM6PR05MB6348.namprd05.prod.outlook.com> <8CC3F837-B4D6-4570-AF2F-37041839F391@employees.org> <21E9A957-1A31-4A11-8E78-5F7E382866D4@juniper.net> <6.2.5.6.2.20200513133654.0f5815d8@elandnews.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.104.14)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ipv6/cfPTVnt_A8y8L0lvkpJAqa7alW8>
X-BeenThere: ipv6@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "IPv6 Maintenance Working Group \(6man\)" <ipv6.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ipv6/>
List-Post: <mailto:ipv6@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 13 May 2020 23:03:12 -0000

Hi,

> On May 13, 2020, at 1:52 PM, S Moonesamy <sm+ietf@elandsys.com> wrote:
> 
> Dear 6MAN Working Chairs,
> 
> During the last 6MAN, there was a comment about the Working Chair about it being too early to have an adoption call for draft-bonica-6man-comp-rtg-hdr.  Could the Working Chairs please provide some information about their decision as there isn't any information about that in the minutes?

We were asked about this and said we didn’t have an answer.  We are working on this.

> 
> I could not find the attendance list for the working group meeting which was held on May 5.  Isn't it an IETF requirement to publish that information?

The bluesheet was published right after the meeting.  See:

https://datatracker.ietf.org/meeting/interim-2020-6man-02/session/6man

Bob




> 
> Regards,
> S. Moonesamy
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email