RE: CRH and RH0
Ron Bonica <rbonica@juniper.net> Wed, 13 May 2020 15:41 UTC
Return-Path: <rbonica@juniper.net>
X-Original-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 67C4F3A0DA7 for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 13 May 2020 08:41:49 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.271
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.271 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.173, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=juniper.net header.b=Efj4mtIo; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=juniper.net header.b=lEtmwita
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id l_LUbkQYy8uz for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 13 May 2020 08:41:47 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx0b-00273201.pphosted.com (mx0b-00273201.pphosted.com [67.231.152.164]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4E03A3A0D9C for <6man@ietf.org>; Wed, 13 May 2020 08:41:47 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from pps.filterd (m0108160.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0b-00273201.pphosted.com (8.16.0.42/8.16.0.42) with SMTP id 04DFbAKt013874; Wed, 13 May 2020 08:41:45 -0700
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=juniper.net; h=from : to : cc : subject : date : message-id : references : in-reply-to : content-type : mime-version; s=PPS1017; bh=4woyNs91Lu8Ve2wsbhooai8QJJbhKv/1hWo1qK56KdE=; b=Efj4mtIoEjYTj4+PoCeRuiplwYjQ3+3mm5UFOPJ5E6dSJCiAXrUGq5Pq+a3hQNR1MPst bO6h5mytKlGBL+IoeWX5FzqBG5GtnaqqIgf19Gue0x4tU5KgHckS0J9OiIuxQhEwjphc HiY0DIRMlbuKD83E4T+I3SsaNzDElkKo67JpRdG69pQPzVgl/oCPW6Ctkc5wJEjhsU3I 5wn7LFS41WEsnnE/cKynqvz0pusgsPqR0ENuxXED6gWYTHKNUzhz+P2jbM/u1DEJpy35 CIgDzcEWCO6kxYkxvlwEo8mTKsHuGUOv7bgkdGYuQGNncA6fGtYjIEvqdtgzJArwuYB6 AA==
Received: from nam12-dm6-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (mail-dm6nam12lp2177.outbound.protection.outlook.com [104.47.59.177]) by mx0b-00273201.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 3100yfhucr-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Wed, 13 May 2020 08:41:45 -0700
ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; s=arcselector9901; d=microsoft.com; cv=none; b=LwQy9eSHu8Q43NZLI6wAIC9FNCUaSZC5y0IUEi9o4pnthe1pqtQH6AC/B2Vk2vVjPf594itfF74e70mxNvHcfHQG7s7LXgRaI7d4FVMAGIJoPsweq6l+MHMszdvrSwU4oAYb0xXnyjhBsbbjHkuNC4vkwUmY0IrqpXj9y5QK4Xqp31FbeLMGFMch+fB6EoaQ9LqoTYuirrryxLiDNM7weeBbFleV/V4BYGvFpKgX/gygriHX+QYBrSabfWpX6NtjOQpHTTYhkktpWe1BcPUr0AL4hNxicjmgM9j2mjfdpaDgDluox1z99EuEqo5KqejVRzwnKS8d40xi65Qhdm1EsQ==
ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=microsoft.com; s=arcselector9901; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=4woyNs91Lu8Ve2wsbhooai8QJJbhKv/1hWo1qK56KdE=; b=YrTYMsRrHHd3i1NJ9Vth6OVGmF9/rMlloEvQX/renaT2d+kzDURHaXYyxSyjmG6/6kqBJl6aSuprtseH6jbckffQNWP76Ur1K4jEvQH6ZtOIyAp0e6C2NFeBuCyWv4v6bC2eBOF0M+y57/DJ9JV3yq3egH9xPaazw+FAkXivwpF1u/QfBElgCoEV0gsobM8IJ/tzID+tKcXvH77Dr6sPw+qRrfHn/ASX5mxb0YP70V2sRW51kHoL5zG4Ft19uG3C7FzbU9Ioi/jtJO6zngPLNYQ7A6qHeNKyu2HaU3xhlWQ2GdHxVuUkJX3tBQF2hIHjEDSnJf1ornYZSsZAmts/nw==
ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.microsoft.com 1; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=juniper.net; dmarc=pass action=none header.from=juniper.net; dkim=pass header.d=juniper.net; arc=none
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=juniper.net; s=selector1; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=4woyNs91Lu8Ve2wsbhooai8QJJbhKv/1hWo1qK56KdE=; b=lEtmwitaTo8t1Dt2eW5L+SSvSGTwhrwXWhnSCfGD+v6A0MTCDPa+/Ab5U0TO2PzLOYk21APR1+QrNsYqf4xCBxRpQRN/J214+/PuWa8mVt8mIdNaMLbzEUqHDHomB/Xl3pLw0t05Fk0tfOEwEDZcjJVIlEa2poDlDB6CWQDD76A=
Received: from DM6PR05MB6348.namprd05.prod.outlook.com (2603:10b6:5:122::15) by DM6PR05MB7146.namprd05.prod.outlook.com (2603:10b6:5:14e::25) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.3000.14; Wed, 13 May 2020 15:41:44 +0000
Received: from DM6PR05MB6348.namprd05.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::c020:3bf5:7230:75e3]) by DM6PR05MB6348.namprd05.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::c020:3bf5:7230:75e3%4]) with mapi id 15.20.3000.016; Wed, 13 May 2020 15:41:43 +0000
From: Ron Bonica <rbonica@juniper.net>
To: Robert Raszuk <robert@raszuk.net>
CC: Bob Hinden <bob.hinden@gmail.com>, 6man <6man@ietf.org>
Subject: RE: CRH and RH0
Thread-Topic: CRH and RH0
Thread-Index: AQHWKIrekPzaF/ez9Eqx/n5++hge6KikxRdQgAAHSoCAAAawsIAAFmwAgAAOYhCAAATmgIAAAbKwgAAC7gCAAANz0IAAC7qAgAAaGoCAAHLDgIAAfRNwgAAI9oCAAAQroIAAAOUQ
Date: Wed, 13 May 2020 15:41:43 +0000
Message-ID: <DM6PR05MB6348B0741DBA105DD5FC86F7AEBF0@DM6PR05MB6348.namprd05.prod.outlook.com>
References: <4EDFE9A2-A69C-4434-BB0A-960C2453250F@cisco.com> <DM6PR05MB6348FE6E3A45320C2A47EB66AEBE0@DM6PR05MB6348.namprd05.prod.outlook.com> <8068EBE1-38DD-411E-A896-EB79084BBCC4@cisco.com> <DM6PR05MB6348326B0F72A009DB4F7746AEBE0@DM6PR05MB6348.namprd05.prod.outlook.com> <942AF8C7-079E-4C81-95AB-F07A182E8F19@employees.org> <DM6PR05MB63483621F4AD3DEACA6FAF35AEBE0@DM6PR05MB6348.namprd05.prod.outlook.com> <6F11579E-0F8A-48EB-86EC-945E17C11BF4@employees.org> <DM6PR05MB6348345A76F32CE07392AA58AEBE0@DM6PR05MB6348.namprd05.prod.outlook.com> <3C800B54-6E3B-483A-8FA0-50075043DFD1@employees.org> <DM6PR05MB63480871BD73F8D35A3D501AAEBE0@DM6PR05MB6348.namprd05.prod.outlook.com> <E800E9A3-C05B-41E0-B752-3E0D067BDBE5@gmail.com> <DM6PR05MB63489AD43E07A2CDED86E274AEBF0@DM6PR05MB6348.namprd05.prod.outlook.com> <CAOj+MMHGyn8-QJJbsL9=wYdzNeE8UPSHMjcwhvCMyx=AsuF4AA@mail.gmail.com> <DM6PR05MB63481EC429A8A02E0064B3E5AEBF0@DM6PR05MB6348.namprd05.prod.outlook.com> <CAOj+MMF15aT7YBR-rqvqpjF=HXqyKPhVSOjHbS_X4sZV8s9bEg@mail.gmail.com> <DM6PR05MB6348B730373B31CFBFDB63F5AEBF0@DM6PR05MB6348.namprd05.prod.outlook.com>
In-Reply-To: <DM6PR05MB6348B730373B31CFBFDB63F5AEBF0@DM6PR05MB6348.namprd05.prod.outlook.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
msip_labels: MSIP_Label_0633b888-ae0d-4341-a75f-06e04137d755_Enabled=true; MSIP_Label_0633b888-ae0d-4341-a75f-06e04137d755_SetDate=2020-05-13T15:39:23Z; MSIP_Label_0633b888-ae0d-4341-a75f-06e04137d755_Method=Standard; MSIP_Label_0633b888-ae0d-4341-a75f-06e04137d755_Name=0633b888-ae0d-4341-a75f-06e04137d755; MSIP_Label_0633b888-ae0d-4341-a75f-06e04137d755_SiteId=bea78b3c-4cdb-4130-854a-1d193232e5f4; MSIP_Label_0633b888-ae0d-4341-a75f-06e04137d755_ActionId=c1e2a454-e1b8-4c6b-8e75-f87e6313bbe8; MSIP_Label_0633b888-ae0d-4341-a75f-06e04137d755_ContentBits=2
dlp-product: dlpe-windows
dlp-version: 11.4.0.45
dlp-reaction: no-action
authentication-results: raszuk.net; dkim=none (message not signed) header.d=none;raszuk.net; dmarc=none action=none header.from=juniper.net;
x-originating-ip: [108.28.233.91]
x-ms-publictraffictype: Email
x-ms-office365-filtering-ht: Tenant
x-ms-office365-filtering-correlation-id: 31328152-3619-4673-6855-08d7f7542369
x-ms-traffictypediagnostic: DM6PR05MB7146:
x-microsoft-antispam-prvs: <DM6PR05MB71461BFB91C7FDCDDF39A730AEBF0@DM6PR05MB7146.namprd05.prod.outlook.com>
x-ms-oob-tlc-oobclassifiers: OLM:9508;
x-forefront-prvs: 0402872DA1
x-ms-exchange-senderadcheck: 1
x-microsoft-antispam: BCL:0;
x-microsoft-antispam-message-info: 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
x-forefront-antispam-report: CIP:255.255.255.255; CTRY:; LANG:en; SCL:1; SRV:; IPV:NLI; SFV:NSPM; H:DM6PR05MB6348.namprd05.prod.outlook.com; PTR:; CAT:NONE; SFTY:; SFS:(4636009)(376002)(366004)(346002)(136003)(396003)(39860400002)(33430700001)(86362001)(6916009)(53546011)(6506007)(26005)(2906002)(8676002)(7116003)(186003)(64756008)(66946007)(316002)(66556008)(66446008)(52536014)(76116006)(66476007)(54906003)(8936002)(2940100002)(9686003)(33440700001)(7696005)(4326008)(478600001)(71200400001)(55016002)(5660300002)(33656002); DIR:OUT; SFP:1102;
x-ms-exchange-antispam-messagedata: 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
x-ms-exchange-transport-forked: True
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_DM6PR05MB6348B0741DBA105DD5FC86F7AEBF0DM6PR05MB6348namp_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-OriginatorOrg: juniper.net
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Network-Message-Id: 31328152-3619-4673-6855-08d7f7542369
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 13 May 2020 15:41:43.8229 (UTC)
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Hosted
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: bea78b3c-4cdb-4130-854a-1d193232e5f4
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-mailboxtype: HOSTED
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-userprincipalname: Hq10w9AoKuvvk1eUAMMZNur0EZQhunPSFB1vwG9cTBkR0GhxsEedxv63M3m0umJlEV3C1A7nNkniVJIXPL8VAA==
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: DM6PR05MB7146
X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:6.0.216, 18.0.676 definitions=2020-05-13_07:2020-05-13, 2020-05-13 signatures=0
X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_spam_notspam policy=outbound_spam score=0 phishscore=0 impostorscore=0 mlxlogscore=810 malwarescore=0 mlxscore=0 cotscore=-2147483648 bulkscore=0 lowpriorityscore=0 clxscore=1015 priorityscore=1501 spamscore=0 adultscore=0 suspectscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.12.0-2004280000 definitions=main-2005130138
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ipv6/6D_uDAUb3MXm4vARvOg1VS2NvAA>
X-BeenThere: ipv6@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "IPv6 Maintenance Working Group \(6man\)" <ipv6.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ipv6/>
List-Post: <mailto:ipv6@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 13 May 2020 15:41:50 -0000
Robert, Oh, btw. RH0 had a "Segments Left" field. Because it talked about segments, would you like to claim that it was also SR? Ron Juniper Business Use Only From: Ron Bonica Sent: Wednesday, May 13, 2020 11:40 AM To: Robert Raszuk <robert@raszuk.net> Cc: Bob Hinden <bob.hinden@gmail.com>; 6man <6man@ietf.org> Subject: RE: CRH and RH0 Robert, So, you are really sure that these people don't exist. Would you like to make a more explicit statement? Ron Juniper Business Use Only From: Robert Raszuk <robert@raszuk.net<mailto:robert@raszuk.net>> Sent: Wednesday, May 13, 2020 11:22 AM To: Ron Bonica <rbonica@juniper.net<mailto:rbonica@juniper.net>> Cc: Bob Hinden <bob.hinden@gmail.com<mailto:bob.hinden@gmail.com>>; 6man <6man@ietf.org<mailto:6man@ietf.org>> Subject: Re: CRH and RH0 [External Email. Be cautious of content] Hi Ron, > Are you questioning whether that statement is true? Yes. Especially this point: " Are not interested in SR" Your draft only talks about SIDs and segments so no matter how you call it the core purpose is segment routing. Take care, R. On Wed, May 13, 2020 at 5:13 PM Ron Bonica <rbonica@juniper.net<mailto:rbonica@juniper.net>> wrote: Robert, At the interim meeting, I said that there are IPv6 operators who: * Want CRH * Are not interested in SR * Are averse to SRv6 Are you questioning whether that statement is true? Ron Juniper Business Use Only From: Robert Raszuk <robert@raszuk.net<mailto:robert@raszuk.net>> Sent: Wednesday, May 13, 2020 3:22 AM To: Ron Bonica <rbonica@juniper.net<mailto:rbonica@juniper.net>> Cc: Bob Hinden <bob.hinden@gmail.com<mailto:bob.hinden@gmail.com>>; 6man <6man@ietf.org<mailto:6man@ietf.org>> Subject: Re: CRH and RH0 [External Email. Be cautious of content] Hi Ron, Given that it is only fifteen pages long, I suspect that progressing it would be less work than arguing about whether to progress it. Sometimes committing a bit more work yields much better results in the long run ... So it is clear that you are not just trying to fix suboptimalities of IPv6 encoding out of the woods. The goal is clear to get this in and use it as a hook to show in SPRING and other routing WGs in IETF that since you have CRH accepted as a WG docs in 6man other groups should follow along and work on SRm6 encodings. The mapping plane between SIDs and labels is already in place in SR-MPLS. Just changing few bit here and there does not make new proposal to stand on its own. I think it has been clearly stated by 6man chairs and AD that any work on SRm6 can be taken on only after SPRING WG accepts the main concept and adopts the main doc as a WG item. So I recommend we go via this proper path with the full picture in mind and the ultimate objective for CRH. Best regards, R.
- Re: Size of CR in CRH Brian E Carpenter
- Re: Size of CR in CRH Erik Kline
- Re: Size of CR in CRH Joel M. Halpern
- Re: Size of CR in CRH Brian E Carpenter
- CRH and RH0 Darren Dukes (ddukes)
- RE: CRH and RH0 Ron Bonica
- Re: CRH and RH0 Darren Dukes (ddukes)
- Re: CRH and RH0 Bob Hinden
- RE: CRH and RH0 Ron Bonica
- Re: CRH and RH0 otroan
- RE: CRH and RH0 Ron Bonica
- Re: CRH and RH0 otroan
- RE: CRH and RH0 Ron Bonica
- Re: CRH and RH0 otroan
- RE: CRH and RH0 Ron Bonica
- Re: CRH and RH0 Bob Hinden
- RE: CRH and RH0 Ron Bonica
- RE: CRH and RH0 Pengshuping (Peng Shuping)
- Re: CRH and RH0 Tom Herbert
- Re: CRH and RH0 Robert Raszuk
- RE: CRH and RH0 Ron Bonica
- Re: CRH and RH0 Robert Raszuk
- RE: CRH and RH0 Ron Bonica
- RE: CRH and RH0 Ron Bonica
- RE: CRH and RH0 Ron Bonica
- Re: CRH and RH0 Robert Raszuk
- RE: CRH and RH0 Ron Bonica
- Re: CRH and RH0 Robert Raszuk
- RE: CRH and RH0 Ron Bonica
- Re: CRH and RH0 Stewart Bryant
- Re: CRH and RH0 Bob Hinden
- RE: CRH and RH0 Ron Bonica
- Re: CRH and RH0 Tom Herbert
- Re: CRH and RH0 Ole Troan
- Re: CRH and RH0 Darren Dukes (ddukes)
- RE: CRH and RH0 Ron Bonica
- Re: CRH and RH0 Bob Hinden
- RE: CRH and RH0 Ron Bonica
- RE: CRH and RH0 Ketan Talaulikar (ketant)
- RE: CRH and RH0 Ketan Talaulikar (ketant)
- Re: CRH and RH0 otroan
- RE: CRH and RH0 Ron Bonica
- Re: CRH and RH0 Darren Dukes (ddukes)
- Re: CRH and RH0 Tom Herbert
- Re: CRH and RH0 Erik Kline
- RE: CRH and RH0 Ketan Talaulikar (ketant)
- RE: CRH and RH0 Ron Bonica
- RE: CRH and RH0 Ron Bonica
- Re: CRH and RH0 Darren Dukes (ddukes)
- RE: CRH and RH0 Ketan Talaulikar (ketant)
- RE: CRH and RH0 Ketan Talaulikar (ketant)
- RE: CRH and RH0 Ron Bonica
- Adoption call criteria for CRH? [was: Re: CRH and… John Scudder
- Re: CRH and RH0 Mark Smith
- Re: Adoption call criteria for CRH? [was: Re: CRH… Robert Raszuk
- Re: CRH and RH0 Robert Raszuk
- RE: CRH and RH0 Ron Bonica
- RE: CRH and RH0 Ron Bonica
- Re: CRH and RH0 Gyan Mishra
- Re: Adoption call criteria for CRH? [was: Re: CRH… S Moonesamy
- Re: Adoption call criteria for CRH? [was: Re: CRH… Brian E Carpenter
- Re: Adoption call criteria for CRH? [was: Re: CRH… Darren Dukes (ddukes)
- Re: Adoption call criteria for CRH? [was: Re: CRH… Joel M. Halpern
- Re: CRH and RH0 Darren Dukes (ddukes)
- Re: Adoption call criteria for CRH? [was: Re: CRH… Brian E Carpenter
- Re: Adoption call criteria for CRH? [was: Re: CRH… John Scudder
- Re: Adoption call criteria for CRH? [was: Re: CRH… Bob Hinden
- Re: Adoption call criteria for CRH? [was: Re: CRH… Bob Hinden
- Re: Adoption call criteria for CRH? [was: Re: CRH… S Moonesamy
- Re: CRH and RH0 Tom Herbert
- RE: CRH and RH0 Ron Bonica
- RE: Adoption call criteria for CRH? [was: Re: CRH… Ketan Talaulikar (ketant)
- RE: Adoption call criteria for CRH? [was: Re: CRH… Pengshuping (Peng Shuping)
- Re: Adoption call criteria for CRH? [was: Re: CRH… Darren Dukes (ddukes)
- RE: CRH and RH0 Chengli (Cheng Li)
- RE: Adoption call criteria for CRH? [was: Re: CRH… Chengli (Cheng Li)
- Re: CRH and RH0 Robert Raszuk
- Re: CRH and RH0 Stewart Bryant
- Re: CRH and RH0 Robert Raszuk
- Re: CRH and RH0 Stewart Bryant
- Re: Adoption call criteria for CRH? [was: Re: CRH… Behcet Sarikaya
- Re: Adoption call criteria for CRH? [was: Re: CRH… Voyer, Daniel
- Re: Adoption call criteria for CRH? [was: Re: CRH… 刘毅松
- 答复: Adoption call criteria for CRH? [was: Re: CRH… qinfengwei
- Re: Adoption call criteria for CRH? [was: Re: CRH… Zafar Ali (zali)
- RE: Adoption call criteria for CRH? [was: Re: CRH… Andrew Alston
- Re: Adoption call criteria for CRH? [was: Re: CRH… Tom Herbert
- RE: Adoption call criteria for CRH? [was: Re: CRH… Ron Bonica
- Re: Adoption call criteria for CRH? [was: Re: CRH… Nick Hilliard
- Re: Adoption call criteria for CRH? [was: Re: CRH… Zafar Ali (zali)
- Re: [spring] Adoption call criteria for CRH? [was… Robert Raszuk
- Re: Adoption call criteria for CRH? [was: Re: CRH… John Scudder
- Re: Adoption call criteria for CRH? [was: Re: CRH… Fernando Gont
- Shorter SIDs in SR over IPv6 (Re: Adoption call c… Greg Mirsky
- Re: Adoption call criteria for CRH? [was: Re: CRH… Zafar Ali (zali)
- Re: Adoption call criteria for CRH? [was: Re: CRH… John Scudder
- Re: Adoption call criteria for CRH? [was: Re: CRH… Tom Herbert
- Re: Adoption call criteria for CRH? [was: Re: CRH… Robert Raszuk
- Re: Adoption call criteria for CRH? [was: Re: CRH… Mark Smith
- Re: Adoption call criteria for CRH? [was: Re: CRH… Tom Herbert
- Re: Adoption call criteria for CRH? [was: Re: CRH… Robert Raszuk
- Size of CR in CRH Bob Hinden
- RE: Size of CR in CRH Templin (US), Fred L
- Re: Size of CR in CRH Bob Hinden
- RE: Size of CR in CRH Templin (US), Fred L
- Re: Size of CR in CRH Tom Herbert
- Re: Size of CR in CRH Nick Hilliard
- RE: Size of CR in CRH Ron Bonica
- RE: Size of CR in CRH Templin (US), Fred L
- Re: Size of CR in CRH Brian E Carpenter
- Re: Size of CR in CRH Nick Hilliard
- Re: Size of CR in CRH Joel M. Halpern
- Re: Size of CR in CRH Bob Hinden
- RE: Size of CR in CRH Wang, Weibin (NSB - CN/Shanghai)
- RE: Size of CR in CRH Andrew Alston
- Re: Size of CR in CRH otroan
- RE: Size of CR in CRH Ron Bonica
- Re: Size of CR in CRH Bob Hinden
- Re: Size of CR in CRH Uma Chunduri
- RE: Size of CR in CRH Ron Bonica
- Re: Size of CR in CRH Tom Herbert
- RE: Size of CR in CRH Ron Bonica
- Re: Size of CR in CRH Tom Herbert
- RE: Size of CR in CRH Ron Bonica
- Re: Size of CR in CRH Ole Troan
- Re: Size of CR in CRH Mark Smith
- Re: Size of CR in CRH Fred Baker
- RE: Size of CR in CRH Ron Bonica
- Re: Size of CR in CRH Tom Herbert
- RE: Size of CR in CRH Robert Raszuk
- Re: Size of CR in CRH Bob Hinden
- On adddress sizing (was: Re: Size of CR in CRH) Toerless Eckert
- Re: Size of CR in CRH Toerless Eckert
- RE: Size of CR in CRH Ron Bonica
- RE: Size of CR in CRH Chengli (Cheng Li)
- RE: Size of CR in CRH Ron Bonica
- Re: Size of CR in CRH Robert Raszuk
- Re: Size of CR in CRH Nick Hilliard
- RE: Size of CR in CRH Ron Bonica
- RE: Size of CR in CRH Ron Bonica
- Re: Size of CR in CRH Zafar Ali (zali)
- Re: Size of CR in CRH Robert Raszuk
- Re: Size of CR in CRH Tom Herbert
- RE: Size of CR in CRH Ron Bonica
- RE: Size of CR in CRH Ron Bonica
- Re: Size of CR in CRH Robert Raszuk
- RE: Size of CR in CRH Ketan Talaulikar (ketant)
- RE: Size of CR in CRH Ron Bonica
- Re: Size of CR in CRH Robert Raszuk
- RE: Size of CR in CRH Ron Bonica
- Re: Size of CR in CRH Tom Herbert
- Re: Size of CR in CRH Robert Raszuk
- Re: Size of CR in CRH Zafar Ali (zali)
- RE: Size of CR in CRH Ron Bonica
- Re: Size of CR in CRH Joel M. Halpern
- Re: Size of CR in CRH Zafar Ali (zali)
- Re: Size of CR in CRH Bob Hinden
- RE: Size of CR in CRH Ron Bonica
- RE: Size of CR in CRH Ron Bonica
- Re: Size of CR in CRH Robert Raszuk
- Re: Size of CR in CRH Robert Raszuk
- Re: Size of CR in CRH Joel M. Halpern
- RE: Size of CR in CRH Pablo Camarillo (pcamaril)
- Re: Size of CR in CRH Joel M. Halpern
- Re: Size of CR in CRH Brian E Carpenter
- Re: Size of CR in CRH Gyan Mishra
- Re: Size of CR in CRH Gyan Mishra
- RE: Size of CR in CRH Wang, Weibin (NSB - CN/Shanghai)
- RE: Size of CR in CRH Ketan Talaulikar (ketant)