Re: [rfc-i] [Rsoc] Archival format to rfc-interest and the IABRe: [rfc-i] [Rsoc] Archival format to rfc-interest and the IAB
John R. Levine
2020-02-13
rfc-interest
/arch/msg/rfc-interest/u1xvSnpOij5rJJtpdMHbUFbRLw0/
2835620
1878341
Re: [rfc-i] Archival format to rfc-interest and the IABRe: [rfc-i] Archival format to rfc-interest and the IAB
Andrew G. Malis
2020-02-13
rfc-interest
/arch/msg/rfc-interest/Rm1tiMaPyjYX20pS7rpp-qM_KeA/
2835598
1878341
[rfc-i] Archival format to rfc-interest and the IAB[rfc-i] Archival format to rfc-interest and the IAB
Sarah Banks
2020-02-13
rfc-interest
/arch/msg/rfc-interest/b7ADOMBwwkXt5IzV-yYbcYttVkI/
2835593
1878341
[rfc-i] Deadline Extended! Call for nominations: RFC Editor model evolution program chairs[rfc-i] Deadline Extended! Call for nominations: RFC Editor model evolution program chairs
IAB Executive Administrative Manag…
2020-02-12
rfc-interest
/arch/msg/rfc-interest/z7emoNbd02aX2nifYEc4U0hvvI4/
2835271
1878204
Re: [rfc-i] Should RFC-7996-bis be an IETF document in an IETF WG?Re: [rfc-i] Should RFC-7996-bis be an IETF document in an IETF WG?
John Levine
2020-02-06
rfc-interest
/arch/msg/rfc-interest/HY0wY8XITROWJ2Mc-tm7bISbZAk/
2832790
1877154
Re: [rfc-i] Should RFC-7996-bis be an IETF document in an IETF WG?Re: [rfc-i] Should RFC-7996-bis be an IETF document in an IETF WG?
Salz, Rich
2020-01-31
rfc-interest
/arch/msg/rfc-interest/tpJi4Vn0L9NzLm6S-Q5PaNI0WMc/
2832714
1877154
Re: [rfc-i] Should RFC-7996-bis be an IETF document in an IETF WG?Re: [rfc-i] Should RFC-7996-bis be an IETF document in an IETF WG?
Bob Hinden
2020-01-29
rfc-interest
/arch/msg/rfc-interest/esle3o8i0fWkxE41u0iOCXnIbG4/
2832713
1877154
Re: [rfc-i] Should RFC-7996-bis be an IETF document in an IETF WG?Re: [rfc-i] Should RFC-7996-bis be an IETF document in an IETF WG?
Andrew G. Malis
2020-01-29
rfc-interest
/arch/msg/rfc-interest/t-DL6e33inQ1tQ22sOEWWB8UIco/
2832712
1877154
Re: [rfc-i] Should RFC-7996-bis be an IETF document in an IETF WG?Re: [rfc-i] Should RFC-7996-bis be an IETF document in an IETF WG?
Brian E Carpenter
2020-01-29
rfc-interest
/arch/msg/rfc-interest/amY6lwFQv1fo6ErbOMpADq2X3vg/
2832711
1877154
Re: [rfc-i] Should RFC-7996-bis be an IETF document in an IETF WG?Re: [rfc-i] Should RFC-7996-bis be an IETF document in an IETF WG?
Andrew G. Malis
2020-01-28
rfc-interest
/arch/msg/rfc-interest/XriaOgA1z54hP9eY51OFNNcOCiA/
2832710
1877154
Re: [rfc-i] Should RFC-7996-bis be an IETF document in an IETF WG?Re: [rfc-i] Should RFC-7996-bis be an IETF document in an IETF WG?
Julian Reschke
2020-01-28
rfc-interest
/arch/msg/rfc-interest/tIiGyLfvbebsijAykNApMEWoL8c/
2832709
1877154
[rfc-i] Should RFC-7996-bis be an IETF document in an IETF WG?[rfc-i] Should RFC-7996-bis be an IETF document in an IETF WG?
Doug Royer
2020-01-28
rfc-interest
/arch/msg/rfc-interest/XeIVMYxk7OfmewbEUHI49roGWo8/
2832708
1877154
Re: [rfc-i] ARIA and SVG and RFC 7996Re: [rfc-i] ARIA and SVG and RFC 7996
Julian Reschke
2020-01-28
rfc-interest
/arch/msg/rfc-interest/3pDBZKz0CSeM75o1GyjJL2JUmSE/
2832707
1877153
[rfc-i] ARIA and SVG and RFC 7996[rfc-i] ARIA and SVG and RFC 7996
Cullen Jennings
2020-01-28
rfc-interest
/arch/msg/rfc-interest/uSQk_YuCRx9iQlNXgc5uV0Bdpp8/
2832706
1877153
Re: [rfc-i] SVG/A specification.Re: [rfc-i] SVG/A specification.
Phillip Hallam-Baker
2020-01-25
rfc-interest
/arch/msg/rfc-interest/2DV7TIufkGy7yNMEaUBu4v0Z9Y8/
2832705
1877152
Re: [rfc-i] SVG/A specification.Re: [rfc-i] SVG/A specification.
Julian Reschke
2020-01-25
rfc-interest
/arch/msg/rfc-interest/-nx4j_X1NK8ZPp3RowDS53cUVgE/
2832704
1877152
Re: [rfc-i] No, constraining to a custom SVG profile is not trivialRe: [rfc-i] No, constraining to a custom SVG profile is not trivial
Brian E Carpenter
2020-01-24
rfc-interest
/arch/msg/rfc-interest/2Z96BEUq8-7b-S71i0slis9Xc4k/
2832703
1874276
Re: [rfc-i] SVG/A specification.Re: [rfc-i] SVG/A specification.
Phillip Hallam-Baker
2020-01-24
rfc-interest
/arch/msg/rfc-interest/NhwjOnXPt6X62ilh28Xh0oNS1Cs/
2832702
1877152
Re: [rfc-i] SVG/A specification.Re: [rfc-i] SVG/A specification.
Leonard Rosenthol
2020-01-24
rfc-interest
/arch/msg/rfc-interest/jDKAxujqMfJkQc1A0HvRxRQX5JI/
2832701
1877152
Re: [rfc-i] SVG/A specification.Re: [rfc-i] SVG/A specification.
Phillip Hallam-Baker
2020-01-24
rfc-interest
/arch/msg/rfc-interest/Pmj5iRB4Hf9tnZszCKgpBI1ramI/
2832700
1877152
Re: [rfc-i] SVG/A specification.Re: [rfc-i] SVG/A specification.
Leonard Rosenthol
2020-01-24
rfc-interest
/arch/msg/rfc-interest/VAXQiQjVrzW2909vG1KpkGnx0aM/
2832699
1877152
[rfc-i] SVG/A specification.[rfc-i] SVG/A specification.
Phillip Hallam-Baker
2020-01-24
rfc-interest
/arch/msg/rfc-interest/bAupEDZffSp7semFwGNO6alI2tY/
2832698
1877152
Re: [rfc-i] No, constraining to a custom SVG profile is not trivialRe: [rfc-i] No, constraining to a custom SVG profile is not trivial
Phillip Hallam-Baker
2020-01-23
rfc-interest
/arch/msg/rfc-interest/pIge5DpaQSuk5D2T2Yq7SWL6PIM/
2832697
1874276
Re: [rfc-i] No, constraining to a custom SVG profile is not trivialRe: [rfc-i] No, constraining to a custom SVG profile is not trivial
Phillip Hallam-Baker
2020-01-23
rfc-interest
/arch/msg/rfc-interest/xuD6RlG9Kw0Ai4StOcNwKVdDypc/
2832696
1874276
Re: [rfc-i] No, constraining to a custom SVG profile is not trivialRe: [rfc-i] No, constraining to a custom SVG profile is not trivial
Brian E Carpenter
2020-01-23
rfc-interest
/arch/msg/rfc-interest/jiDXM_2oxGW11f7ay1796oCOCeQ/
2832695
1874276
Re: [rfc-i] No, constraining to a custom SVG profile is not trivialRe: [rfc-i] No, constraining to a custom SVG profile is not trivial
Donald Eastlake
2020-01-22
rfc-interest
/arch/msg/rfc-interest/DxdOxpKKDkPi9b1__10xNoPxIMk/
2832694
1874276
Re: [rfc-i] No, constraining to a custom SVG profile is not trivialRe: [rfc-i] No, constraining to a custom SVG profile is not trivial
S Moonesamy
2020-01-22
rfc-interest
/arch/msg/rfc-interest/8PSq-2X7MyBp07G9Dh8kJBIuw_M/
2832693
1874276
Re: [rfc-i] The problem is SVG-TinyRe: [rfc-i] The problem is SVG-Tiny
Michael Richardson
2020-01-22
rfc-interest
/arch/msg/rfc-interest/8i7m7eNyFZvokASUTQM9et9AU2E/
2832692
1875038
Re: [rfc-i] No, constraining to a custom SVG profile is not trivialRe: [rfc-i] No, constraining to a custom SVG profile is not trivial
Michael Richardson
2020-01-22
rfc-interest
/arch/msg/rfc-interest/d_atyUXCdw0DYbxVTBApE7N08Yg/
2832691
1874276
Re: [rfc-i] Where was the discussion?Re: [rfc-i] Where was the discussion?
Michael Richardson
2020-01-22
rfc-interest
/arch/msg/rfc-interest/zdymlgbd6N3fbZxXvdoGyruMn3I/
2832690
1874276
Re: [rfc-i] No, constraining to a custom SVG profile is not trivialRe: [rfc-i] No, constraining to a custom SVG profile is not trivial
Salz, Rich
2020-01-22
rfc-interest
/arch/msg/rfc-interest/IyuL5Ot4GQiI4AJdMKFhit9gMBo/
2832689
1874276
Re: [rfc-i] Where was the discussion?Re: [rfc-i] Where was the discussion?
Julian Reschke
2020-01-22
rfc-interest
/arch/msg/rfc-interest/Zbhoq7orNfpRADs6tAcyYeJQbzQ/
2832688
1874276
Re: [rfc-i] Where was the discussion?Re: [rfc-i] Where was the discussion?
Phillip Hallam-Baker
2020-01-22
rfc-interest
/arch/msg/rfc-interest/3oqBAckjOCFCb2KL1iLyLpWnFpk/
2832687
1874276
Re: [rfc-i] No, constraining to a custom SVG profile is not trivialRe: [rfc-i] No, constraining to a custom SVG profile is not trivial
Christian Huitema
2020-01-22
rfc-interest
/arch/msg/rfc-interest/KBIAIxksuGR_sYmWSKN_ONYwpy4/
2832686
1874276
Re: [rfc-i] No, constraining to a custom SVG profile is not trivialRe: [rfc-i] No, constraining to a custom SVG profile is not trivial
Carsten Bormann
2020-01-22
rfc-interest
/arch/msg/rfc-interest/k_th9J9We1MFSyo190Ztojv8_ys/
2832685
1874276
Re: [rfc-i] The problem is SVG-TinyRe: [rfc-i] The problem is SVG-Tiny
Julian Reschke
2020-01-22
rfc-interest
/arch/msg/rfc-interest/3amxghfQw8Ve0NTY8vOekxvmKfI/
2832684
1875038
Re: [rfc-i] Where was the discussion?Re: [rfc-i] Where was the discussion?
Julian Reschke
2020-01-22
rfc-interest
/arch/msg/rfc-interest/GxGUTZ75NDChPVdx3oyWLJEYkv4/
2832683
1874276
Re: [rfc-i] No, constraining to a custom SVG profile is not trivialRe: [rfc-i] No, constraining to a custom SVG profile is not trivial
Brian E Carpenter
2020-01-22
rfc-interest
/arch/msg/rfc-interest/cv4fJOMIIrhttHngomxaPBRS3S0/
2832682
1874276
Re: [rfc-i] The problem is SVG-TinyRe: [rfc-i] The problem is SVG-Tiny
Michael Richardson
2020-01-22
rfc-interest
/arch/msg/rfc-interest/c7xFWmmFcBpdPHnb27YLDETwNDU/
2832681
1875038
Re: [rfc-i] Where was the discussion?Re: [rfc-i] Where was the discussion?
Mark Nottingham
2020-01-22
rfc-interest
/arch/msg/rfc-interest/dpy8xF-tLhAVgUfnk2Z0XhtjL40/
2832680
1874276
11675 Messages