sip Discussion Archive - Thread Index - 2011
[Newer Messages] [Older Messages] [Date Index]- [Sip] Closing the SIP and SIPPING mailing lists, Robert Sparks
- [Sip] ISDN/SIP interworking [ETSI TS 183 036], Javi Muñoz
- [Sip] SDP telephone-event (DTMF) payload negotiation, RUOFF, LARS (LARS)** CTR **
- Re: [Sip] SDP telephone-event (DTMF) payload negotiation, Paul Kyzivat
- Re: [Sip] SDP telephone-event (DTMF) payload negotiation, RUOFF, LARS (LARS)** CTR **
- Re: [Sip] SDP telephone-event (DTMF) payload negotiation, Paul Kyzivat
- [Sip] 101 dialog establishment/ambiguous, VARUN AGRAWAL
- Re: [Sip] 101 dialog establishment/ambiguous, Iñaki Baz Castillo
- [Sip] Question on rfc4474, Lewis Adam-CAL022
- [Sip] Which WG RFC 5626 belongs to?, Iñaki Baz Castillo
- Re: [Sip] Which WG RFC 5626 belongs to?, Iñaki Baz Castillo
- [Sip] RFC 5626 (Outbound) hard to understand non-register request processing, Iñaki Baz Castillo
- [Sip] How to determine MO and MT call in SIP Networks, kiran kumar
- Re: [Sip] How to determine MO and MT call in SIP Networks, Iñaki Baz Castillo
- [Sip] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC6072 (2988), RFC Errata System
- [Sip] Using TLS in the first hop - Bug in RFC 5630, Iñaki Baz Castillo
- Re: [Sip] Using TLS in the first hop - Bug in RFC 5630, Olle E. Johansson
- Re: [Sip] Using TLS in the first hop - Bug in RFC 5630, Iñaki Baz Castillo
- Re: [Sip] Using TLS in the first hop - Bug in RFC 5630, Olle E. Johansson
- Re: [Sip] Using TLS in the first hop - Bug in RFC 5630, Iñaki Baz Castillo
- Re: [Sip] Using TLS in the first hop - Bug in RFC 5630, Hadriel Kaplan
- Re: [Sip] Using TLS in the first hop - Bug in RFC 5630, Iñaki Baz Castillo
- Re: [Sip] Using TLS in the first hop - Bug in RFC 5630, Iñaki Baz Castillo
- Re: [Sip] Using TLS in the first hop - Bug in RFC 5630, Hadriel Kaplan
- Re: [Sip] Using TLS in the first hop - Bug in RFC 5630, Iñaki Baz Castillo
- Re: [Sip] Using TLS in the first hop - Bug in RFC 5630, Iñaki Baz Castillo
- Re: [Sip] Using TLS in the first hop - Bug in RFC 5630, Hadriel Kaplan
- Re: [Sip] Using TLS in the first hop - Bug in RFC 5630, DRAGE, Keith (Keith)
- Re: [Sip] Using TLS in the first hop - Bug in RFC 5630, Iñaki Baz Castillo
- Re: [Sip] Using TLS in the first hop - Bug in RFC 5630, Samir Srivastava
- Re: [Sip] Using TLS in the first hop - Bug in RFC 5630, DRAGE, Keith (Keith)
- Re: [Sip] Using TLS in the first hop - Bug in RFC 5630, Horvath, Ernst
- Re: [Sip] Using TLS in the first hop - Bug in RFC 5630, Iñaki Baz Castillo
- Re: [Sip] Using TLS in the first hop - Bug in RFC 5630, Iñaki Baz Castillo
- Re: [Sip] Using TLS in the first hop - Bug in RFC 5630, Olle E. Johansson
- Re: [Sip] Using TLS in the first hop - Bug in RFC 5630, Horvath, Ernst
- Re: [Sip] Using TLS in the first hop - Bug in RFC 5630, Iñaki Baz Castillo
- Re: [Sip] Using TLS in the first hop - Bug in RFC 5630, DRAGE, Keith (Keith)
- Re: [Sip] Using TLS in the first hop - Bug in RFC 5630, Iñaki Baz Castillo
- Re: [Sip] Using TLS in the first hop - Bug in RFC 5630, Vijay K. Gurbani
- Re: [Sip] Using TLS in the first hop - Bug in RFC 5630, Iñaki Baz Castillo
- Re: [Sip] Using TLS in the first hop - Bug in RFC 5630, DRAGE, Keith (Keith)
- Re: [Sip] Using TLS in the first hop - Bug in RFC 5630, DRAGE, Keith (Keith)
- Re: [Sip] Using TLS in the first hop - Bug in RFC 5630, Iñaki Baz Castillo
- Re: [Sip] Using TLS in the first hop - Bug in RFC 5630, Olle E. Johansson
- [Sip] Sent 18x with 'require:100rel' but no PRACK recieved, etherchen
- Re: [Sip] Sent 18x with 'require:100rel' but no PRACK recieved, honsha.narayan
- [Sip] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC3261 (2910), RFC Errata System
- Re: [Sip] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC3261 (2910), Bob Penfield
- Re: [Sip] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC3261 (2910), Iñaki Baz Castillo
- [Sip] Table2/3 maintenance (was Re: [Technical Errata Reported] RFC3261 (2910)), Robert Sparks
- Re: [Sip] Table2/3 maintenance (was Re: [Technical Errata Reported] RFC3261 (2910)), Iñaki Baz Castillo
- Re: [Sip] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC3261 (2910), Robert Sparks
- Re: [Sip] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC3261 (2910), Iñaki Baz Castillo
- Re: [Sip] [sipcore] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC3261 (2910), Robert Sparks
- Re: [Sip] [sipcore] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC3261 (2910), Romel Khan
- Re: [Sip] [sipcore] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC3261 (2910), Samir Srivastava
- Re: [Sip] [sipcore] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC3261 (2910), Paul Kyzivat
- Re: [Sip] [sipcore] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC3261 (2910), Samir Srivastava
- Re: [Sip] [sipcore] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC3261 (2910), Paul Kyzivat
- Re: [Sip] [sipcore] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC3261 (2910), Worley, Dale R (Dale)
- Re: [Sip] [sipcore] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC3261 (2910), Iñaki Baz Castillo
- [Sip] Types of Conference calls supported by SIP, Ruben Roque
- Re: [Sip] Types of Conference calls supported by SIP, Mary Barnes
- [Sip] Codec Negotiation and renegotiataion, atul garg
- Re: [Sip] Codec Negotiation and renegotiataion, Siddiqui, Noman
- Re: [Sip] Codec Negotiation and renegotiataion, Paul Kyzivat
- [Sip] draft-jennings-sip-dtls: shouldn't it define ; transport=dccp ?, Iñaki Baz Castillo
- Re: [Sip] draft-jennings-sip-dtls: shouldn't it define ; transport=dccp ?, DRAGE, Keith (Keith)
- Re: [Sip] draft-jennings-sip-dtls: shouldn't it define ; transport=dccp ?, Iñaki Baz Castillo
- Re: [Sip] draft-jennings-sip-dtls: shouldn't it define ; transport=dccp ?, DRAGE, Keith (Keith)
- Re: [Sip] Sip Digest, Vol 82, Issue 6, Verma, Salil (NSN - IN/Gurgaon)
- Re: [Sip] Sip Digest, Vol 82, Issue 6, Iñaki Baz Castillo
- [Sip] Difference between B2BUA and Proxy, Leon Li
- [Sip] sip qos, Hakiri Akram
- Re: [Sip] sip qos, Iñaki Baz Castillo
- Re: [Sip] sip qos, Worley, Dale R (Dale)
- Re: [Sip] sip qos, James M. Polk
- Re: [Sip] sip qos, Hakiri Akram
- [Sip] Clarification with respect to "To" and "From" headers, Abhishek Gupta
- Re: [Sip] Clarification with respect to "To" and "From" headers, Iñaki Baz Castillo
- [Sip] SIP level bundeling, atul garg
- Re: [Sip] SIP level bundeling, Iñaki Baz Castillo
- Re: [Sip] SIP level bundeling, Brett Tate
- Re: [Sip] SIP level bundeling, Worley, Dale R (Dale)
- [Sip] RFC 3261 - 16.10 (CANCEL processing in a Proxy), Iñaki Baz Castillo
- Re: [Sip] RFC 3261 - 16.10 (CANCEL processing in a Proxy), Vijay K. Gurbani
- Re: [Sip] RFC 3261 - 16.10 (CANCEL processing in a Proxy), Iñaki Baz Castillo
- Re: [Sip] RFC 3261 - 16.10 (CANCEL processing in a Proxy), Vijay K. Gurbani
- Re: [Sip] RFC 3261 - 16.10 (CANCEL processing in a Proxy), Iñaki Baz Castillo
- [Sip] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC3327 (2778), RFC Errata System
- [Sip] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC3261 (2769), RFC Errata System
- Re: [Sip] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC3261 (2769), Adam Roach
- Re: [Sip] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC3261 (2769), Dean Willis
- Re: [Sip] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC3261 (2769), Iñaki Baz Castillo
- [Sip] Possible bug in "Non-INVITE Client Transaction" - 17.1.2.2, Iñaki Baz Castillo
- Re: [Sip] [Sip-implementors] Possible bug in "Non-INVITE Client Transaction" - 17.1.2.2, Iñaki Baz Castillo
- Re: [Sip] Possible bug in "Non-INVITE Client Transaction" - 17.1.2.2, Dean Willis
- Re: [Sip] Possible bug in "Non-INVITE Client Transaction" - 17.1.2.2, Iñaki Baz Castillo
- Re: [Sip] Possible bug in "Non-INVITE Client Transaction" - 17.1.2.2, Peter Hanratty
- Re: [Sip] Possible bug in "Non-INVITE Client Transaction" - 17.1.2.2, Iñaki Baz Castillo
- Re: [Sip] Possible bug in "Non-INVITE Client Transaction" - 17.1.2.2, Robert Sparks
- Re: [Sip] Possible bug in "Non-INVITE Client Transaction" - 17.1.2.2, Iñaki Baz Castillo
- [Sip] Multiple registration using single UA, E D
- Re: [Sip] Multiple registration using single UA, Brett Tate
- Re: [Sip] Multiple registration using single UA, Paul Kyzivat
- [Sip] Warning header, isshed
- Re: [Sip] Warning header, Christer Holmberg
- Re: [Sip] Warning header, isshed
- Re: [Sip] [Sip-implementors] Warning header, Saúl Ibarra Corretgé
- Re: [Sip] Warning header, Worley, Dale R (Dale)
- Re: [Sip] Warning header, isshed
- Re: [Sip] [Sip-implementors] Content-Disposition, Attila Sipos
- Re: [Sip] [Sip-implementors] Content-Disposition, Worley, Dale R (Dale)
- Re: [Sip] Different SDP Session Version in 183 & 200 OK, Nitin Kapoor
- Re: [Sip] Different SDP Session Version in 183 & 200 OK, Nitin Kapoor
- Re: [Sip] [Sip-implementors] Different SDP Session Version in 183 &200 OK, Jaiswal, Sanjiv (NSN - IN/Bangalore)
- Re: [Sip] [Sip-implementors] Different SDP Session Version in 183 &200 OK, Nitin Kapoor
- Re: [Sip] Different SDP Session Version in 183 & 200 OK, Vijay Tiwari
- Re: [Sip] Different SDP Session Version in 183 & 200 OK, Sudeesh Ravindran
- [Sip] Protocol Action: 'A Framework for Session Initiation Protocol (SIP) Session Policies' to Proposed Standard (draft-ietf-sip-session-policy-framework-10.txt), The IESG
- [Sip] I-D Action:draft-ietf-sip-session-policy-framework-10.txt, Internet-Drafts
- [Sip] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC5763 (2723), RFC Errata System
- Re: [Sip] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC5763 (2723), Elwell, John
- Re: [Sip] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC5763 (2723), Robert Sparks
- [Sip] RFC 6072 on Certificate Management Service for the Session Initiation Protocol (SIP), rfc-editor
- [Sip] I-D Action:draft-ietf-sip-session-policy-framework-09.txt, Internet-Drafts
- [Sip] Changing route set in SIP outbound, Avshalom Houri
- Re: [Sip] Changing route set in SIP outbound, Worley, Dale R (Dale)
- Re: [Sip] Changing route set in SIP outbound, aayush
- Re: [Sip] Changing route set in SIP outbound, Nataraju A.B
- Re: [Sip] Changing route set in SIP outbound, Dean Willis
- Re: [Sip] Changing route set in SIP outbound, Worley, Dale R (Dale)
[Newer Messages] [Older Messages] [Date Index]