Re: [108attendees] Meetecho participant pics

Cullen Jennings <fluffy@iii.ca> Tue, 28 July 2020 14:33 UTC

Return-Path: <fluffy@iii.ca>
X-Original-To: 108attendees@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: 108attendees@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 22E4B3A0CEA for <108attendees@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 28 Jul 2020 07:33:59 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.899
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.899 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id trBZYDMzeiN4 for <108attendees@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 28 Jul 2020 07:33:58 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtp68.iad3a.emailsrvr.com (smtp68.iad3a.emailsrvr.com [173.203.187.68]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D917D3A0CD6 for <108attendees@ietf.org>; Tue, 28 Jul 2020 07:33:57 -0700 (PDT)
X-Auth-ID: fluffy@iii.ca
Received: by smtp25.relay.iad3a.emailsrvr.com (Authenticated sender: fluffy-AT-iii.ca) with ESMTPSA id 9B89F25374; Tue, 28 Jul 2020 10:33:56 -0400 (EDT)
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_39200215-72BE-4FD2-B71E-A8F71A2F0051"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 12.4 \(3445.104.15\))
From: Cullen Jennings <fluffy@iii.ca>
In-Reply-To: <20200728142342.CC3761D96A36@ary.qy>
Date: Tue, 28 Jul 2020 08:33:55 -0600
Cc: 108attendees@ietf.org
Message-Id: <85158EF5-38E8-4F7E-B3BD-DC1717DB1553@iii.ca>
References: <20200728142342.CC3761D96A36@ary.qy>
To: John Levine <ietf@johnlevine.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.104.15)
X-Classification-ID: 47bd8fd0-a906-453d-80ca-e60728a82086-1-1
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/108attendees/2ecXW4BWSWNGTkyCmN3GEXc55OA>
Subject: Re: [108attendees] Meetecho participant pics
X-BeenThere: 108attendees@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Mailing list for IETF 108 attendees <108attendees.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/108attendees>, <mailto:108attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/108attendees/>
List-Post: <mailto:108attendees@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:108attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/108attendees>, <mailto:108attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 28 Jul 2020 14:33:59 -0000


> On Jul 28, 2020, at 8:23 AM, John Levine <ietf@johnlevine.com> wrote:
> 
> In article <04C29E68-7846-49EB-85F7-F5D90A7CB96B@iii.ca <mailto:04C29E68-7846-49EB-85F7-F5D90A7CB96B@iii.ca>> you write:
>> 
>> If meetecho was open source, I would submit a PR to use WebFinger (RFC 7033) to get my avatar. That was one of
>> the key uses cases for WebFinger. 
> 
> You can certainly suggest it to them, they've been very responsive.
> 
> What webfinger servers would they use?  The only keys they have are people's
> e-mail addresses.
> 

If my email is im@fluffy.im, the point of webfinger is the lookup can be delegated by fluffy.im so I can decide what servers I trust instead of meet echo needing to decide for me.