Re: [108attendees] Meetecho participant pics
Robert Moskowitz <rgm@labs.htt-consult.com> Mon, 27 July 2020 22:05 UTC
Return-Path: <rgm@labs.htt-consult.com>
X-Original-To: 108attendees@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: 108attendees@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 13C213A09A5 for <108attendees@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 27 Jul 2020 15:05:47 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.899
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.899 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, NICE_REPLY_A=-0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id j2D5ozdzjPcO for <108attendees@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 27 Jul 2020 15:05:43 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from z9m9z.htt-consult.com (z9m9z.htt-consult.com [23.123.122.147]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 99FC83A0900 for <108attendees@ietf.org>; Mon, 27 Jul 2020 15:05:43 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by z9m9z.htt-consult.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E8ABD62422; Mon, 27 Jul 2020 18:05:41 -0400 (EDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at htt-consult.com
Received: from z9m9z.htt-consult.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (z9m9z.htt-consult.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id nLZCjSher7rk; Mon, 27 Jul 2020 18:05:34 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from lx140e.htt-consult.com (unknown [192.168.160.29]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by z9m9z.htt-consult.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id A400C62454; Mon, 27 Jul 2020 18:05:31 -0400 (EDT)
To: Henk Birkholz <henk.birkholz@sit.fraunhofer.de>, Bret Jordan <jordan2175@gmail.com>
Cc: John Levine <ietf@johnlevine.com>, 108attendees@ietf.org
References: <20200727203610.C12881D8F976@ary.qy> <4b4ee2bb-c9ed-bb64-6a63-d8c55148430c@labs.htt-consult.com> <CAOxKQDxGvuO6319Zvh=cEM4nUP8HXXvbeF_8ubEAdv3ZA7w1cg@mail.gmail.com> <1b45835f-edfb-6d41-9540-ee94e0eede5c@sit.fraunhofer.de>
From: Robert Moskowitz <rgm@labs.htt-consult.com>
Message-ID: <d73ace2a-6341-fab4-549b-7f680a51fa6d@labs.htt-consult.com>
Date: Mon, 27 Jul 2020 18:05:30 -0400
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.10.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <1b45835f-edfb-6d41-9540-ee94e0eede5c@sit.fraunhofer.de>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------C87000DD70641AE8369AFF97"
Content-Language: en-US
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/108attendees/A5N6UZR-KzOSp5DSo6f_VA9WUf4>
Subject: Re: [108attendees] Meetecho participant pics
X-BeenThere: 108attendees@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Mailing list for IETF 108 attendees <108attendees.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/108attendees>, <mailto:108attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/108attendees/>
List-Post: <mailto:108attendees@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:108attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/108attendees>, <mailto:108attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 27 Jul 2020 22:05:50 -0000
No comments about meeting rooms too cold. Or wifi in rooms awful. I mean there has to be SOMETHING to talk about around the cookie table. Since '07? Just shows that my attention is on other matters... On 7/27/20 5:57 PM, Henk Birkholz wrote: > Isn't "attendees" already an alias for "bike-shed"? > > Sorry :-) To be totally honest here, I am not unhappy to see at least > one lengthy, curious thread on the 108attendees list! Makes this IETF > experience feel a little bit closer to... the real thing - as long as > we are civil and we think of Dijkstra if the discussion becomes too > circular. > > Cheers, > > Henk > > On 27.07.20 23:45, Bret Jordan wrote: >> Whether people opt to have a Gravatar or not is about as relevant to >> the IETF as if you drink Non-fat, 1%, 2%, 3%, Half-Half, for Full >> Cream milk or if you are against people drinking milk all together. >> Or better yet, if the toilet paper roll should roll forward or >> backward. Gravatar has been around for a very long time, since early >> 2007. If you are just finding out about it now, then, well, sorry. >> But it has been around for a long time. A lot of services and sites >> on the internet use it, it is a great idea. If you do not want one, >> then do not get one. Simple. But it is nice to have a single place to >> update your "avatar" and have it work in a lot of places. >> >> We should really have a list called bike-shed@ietf.org >> <mailto:bike-shed@ietf.org> so all of these discussions and debates >> can be moved there. >> >> Bret >> >> Sent from my TI-99/4A >> PGP Fingerprint: 63B4 FC53 680A 6B7D 1447 F2C0 74F8 ACAE 7415 0050 >> >> >> On Mon, Jul 27, 2020 at 3:37 PM Robert Moskowitz >> <rgm@labs.htt-consult.com <mailto:rgm@labs.htt-consult.com>> wrote: >> >> >> >> On 7/27/20 4:36 PM, John Levine wrote: >> > In article >> <0bca5ca1-1f1e-f13c-f64b-7f9787be6271@labs.htt-consult.com >> <mailto:0bca5ca1-1f1e-f13c-f64b-7f9787be6271@labs.htt-consult.com>> >> you write: >> >> Exactly my concern. >> >> >> >> I don't HAVE a Wordpress account; why do I need one? >> > A few seconds of clicking reveals that Gravatar is run by >> Automattic >> > which is better known as Wordpress.com. That's why you need a >> > Wordpress account, it *is* Wordpress. >> I am not aware of any business reason for me to get a Wordpress >> account. >> >> Ergo I will not have a gravatar. >> >> Simple. >> >> Others will undoubtedly have a different calculus. >> >> > >> > They have a detailed privacy policy here: >> > >> > https://automattic.com/privacy/ >> > >> > It's pretty reasonable, no sale of info to third parties, the >> most >> > evil thing they do is use your profile info to target ads on >> their >> > site, which doesn't apply to Gravatar since it's not providing >> ads, >> > just mapping hashes of addresses to pictures. I've had my >> Gravatar set >> > up for ages including for some addresses that only Wordpress >> knows and >> > I've never gotten any unexpected spam to those addresses. >> > >> > I suspect it wouldn't be terribly hard to use the Datatracker pix >> instead >> > but I'd put it pretty low on the list of things to do. >> > >> > R's, >> > John >> > >> >> -- 108attendees mailing list >> 108attendees@ietf.org <mailto:108attendees@ietf.org> >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/108attendees >> >> > -- Standard Robert Moskowitz Owner HTT Consulting C:248-219-2059 F:248-968-2824 E:rgm@labs.htt-consult.com There's no limit to what can be accomplished if it doesn't matter who gets the credit
- [108attendees] Meetecho participant pics Robert Moskowitz
- Re: [108attendees] Meetecho participant pics Jay Daley
- Re: [108attendees] Meetecho participant pics Jonathan Lennox
- Re: [108attendees] Meetecho participant pics Joel M. Halpern
- Re: [108attendees] Meetecho participant pics Jeffrey Haas
- Re: [108attendees] Meetecho participant pics Job Snijders
- Re: [108attendees] Meetecho participant pics Robert Moskowitz
- Re: [108attendees] Meetecho participant pics Jay Daley
- Re: [108attendees] Meetecho participant pics Christian Amsüss
- Re: [108attendees] Meetecho participant pics Darshak Thakore
- Re: [108attendees] Meetecho participant pics Carlos M. Martinez
- Re: [108attendees] Meetecho participant pics Robert Moskowitz
- Re: [108attendees] Meetecho participant pics Henk Birkholz
- Re: [108attendees] Meetecho participant pics Robert Moskowitz
- Re: [108attendees] Meetecho participant pics Christian Huitema
- Re: [108attendees] Meetecho participant pics Carlos M. Martinez
- Re: [108attendees] Meetecho participant pics Bob Hinden
- Re: [108attendees] Meetecho participant pics Behcet Sarikaya
- Re: [108attendees] Meetecho participant pics Robert Moskowitz
- Re: [108attendees] Meetecho participant pics Dr Clement Genty
- Re: [108attendees] Meetecho participant pics John Levine
- Re: [108attendees] Meetecho participant pics Robert Moskowitz
- Re: [108attendees] Meetecho participant pics Bret Jordan
- Re: [108attendees] Meetecho participant pics Henk Birkholz
- Re: [108attendees] Meetecho participant pics John C Klensin
- Re: [108attendees] Meetecho participant pics Bret Jordan
- Re: [108attendees] Meetecho participant pics Robert Moskowitz
- Re: [108attendees] Meetecho participant pics Carsten Bormann
- Re: [108attendees] Meetecho participant pics Carsten Bormann
- Re: [108attendees] Meetecho participant pics Christian Huitema
- Re: [108attendees] Meetecho participant pics John Levine
- Re: [108attendees] Meetecho participant pics Jay Daley
- Re: [108attendees] Meetecho participant pics Melinda Shore
- Re: [108attendees] Meetecho participant pics Christian Huitema
- Re: [108attendees] Meetecho participant pics John Levine
- Re: [108attendees] Meetecho participant pics Christian Amsüss
- Re: [108attendees] Meetecho participant pics Frode Kileng
- Re: [108attendees] Meetecho participant pics Robert Moskowitz
- Re: [108attendees] Meetecho participant pics Cullen Jennings
- Re: [108attendees] Meetecho participant pics John Levine
- Re: [108attendees] Meetecho participant pics Cullen Jennings
- Re: [108attendees] Meetecho participant pics John R. Levine
- Re: [108attendees] Meetecho participant pics Robert Moskowitz
- Re: [108attendees] Meetecho participant pics tale