Re: [108attendees] Meetecho participant pics

John Levine <ietf@johnlevine.com> Tue, 28 July 2020 00:28 UTC

Return-Path: <johnl@iecc.com>
X-Original-To: 108attendees@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: 108attendees@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C64793A085D for <108attendees@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 27 Jul 2020 17:28:11 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.099
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.099 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1536-bit key) header.d=iecc.com header.b=GvunLuzB; dkim=pass (1536-bit key) header.d=johnlevine.com header.b=NQQ+l6I5
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ai8d3TvQzD1Y for <108attendees@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 27 Jul 2020 17:28:10 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from gal.iecc.com (gal.iecc.com [IPv6:2001:470:1f07:1126:0:43:6f73:7461]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id ECBD43A08E4 for <108attendees@ietf.org>; Mon, 27 Jul 2020 17:28:09 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (qmail 23762 invoked from network); 28 Jul 2020 00:28:08 -0000
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple; d=iecc.com; h=date:message-id:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; s=5ccd.5f1f7118.k2007; bh=z2ktEeeMjrHy8pouvDDgulnudYZsJpkKXY/dB72i3sI=; b=GvunLuzBK/xtmsdkGq0r9avCMDbIBlDnXwwNnjOwR8m9MUJhFr/ChWHJHVRGuqbrCa3ncujLaX65OaRY9cv9/hSBE8xH3GLzF60cGVxi/NC1WgFbMoWSN1Gk8u1odnzwJth0UxNAsoPWPUVEcyNmDmBml/lQ5lp5FdXMeD2dsA4gqJ1Dh3SAKuRjg/ihHGZMdoV93c0YlaCClBwTcucTcBIUp/l5CiZZYFOHNuMvrG466EwRcFXkfU/qoUC12ItZ
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple; d=johnlevine.com; h=date:message-id:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; s=5ccd.5f1f7118.k2007; bh=z2ktEeeMjrHy8pouvDDgulnudYZsJpkKXY/dB72i3sI=; b=NQQ+l6I5+QhTXnAoTygN/9kXODjXw64HAptjAEmG/QUCfU4cL5kKlK2PD+Z847kQollUAdn2ixeCG7tdixHnb+nZG8qsSio48rcLx0CDfGInESIBHSVwXnALme4BteVByJveKDHbsAk4QRvTiNlLxt4DgD8T0fhsBapmcWXgNHBqbt+/aMTwmY1/GPhWJh/JFhEgTrC8bUEmuMTWHS7dLDoTmv6ClG7NcICbojGhFLqWI1bPvNSnPKrSI23QhGO4
Received: from ary.qy ([IPv6:2001:470:1f07:1126::78:696d:6170]) by imap.iecc.com ([IPv6:2001:470:1f07:1126::78:696d:6170]) with ESMTPS (TLS1.2 ECDHE-RSA AES-256-GCM AEAD) via TCP6; 28 Jul 2020 00:28:08 -0000
Received: by ary.qy (Postfix, from userid 501) id 9D1071D93105; Mon, 27 Jul 2020 20:28:07 -0400 (EDT)
Date: Mon, 27 Jul 2020 20:28:07 -0400
Message-Id: <20200728002807.9D1071D93105@ary.qy>
From: John Levine <ietf@johnlevine.com>
To: 108attendees@ietf.org
Cc: john-ietf@jck.com
In-Reply-To: <7F856E693FC721068D11CBC9@PSB>
Organization: Taughannock Networks
X-Headerized: yes
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-transfer-encoding: 8bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/108attendees/41vUArPtU5N-Q_nK7ehZC_j0drs>
Subject: Re: [108attendees] Meetecho participant pics
X-BeenThere: 108attendees@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Mailing list for IETF 108 attendees <108attendees.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/108attendees>, <mailto:108attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/108attendees/>
List-Post: <mailto:108attendees@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:108attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/108attendees>, <mailto:108attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 28 Jul 2020 00:28:20 -0000

In article <7F856E693FC721068D11CBC9@PSB> you write:
>backward in UI quality.  Given all of that, getting these
>pictures/avatars up was a justified expenditure of programming
>time and energy because?  Or, to put it more closely in terms of
>your comment, if this wasn't worth doing right (by pulling
>pictures from the Datatracker), why was it worth doing at all?

I can't speak for Meetecho but my guess is that a) adding the code to
fetch gravatar pictures is extremely simple and probably took about
five minutes to add, and 2) we are not Meetecho's only user and even
within the IETF I wouldn't count on more people having Datatracker pix
than gravatars.

I don't recall whether the gravatar pictures were there in Singapore.
Quite possibly they were and nobody noticed.

R's,
John