Re: [89attendees] unlawful in Britain to carry pocketknives that lock

"DRAGE, Keith (Keith)" <keith.drage@alcatel-lucent.com> Sun, 09 March 2014 01:53 UTC

Return-Path: <keith.drage@alcatel-lucent.com>
X-Original-To: 89attendees@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: 89attendees@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 65E8B1A0303 for <89attendees@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 8 Mar 2014 17:53:01 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id dPVucdZrHQ9m for <89attendees@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 8 Mar 2014 17:52:59 -0800 (PST)
Received: from hoemail2.alcatel.com (hoemail2.alcatel.com [192.160.6.149]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3DF171A02FF for <89attendees@ietf.org>; Sat, 8 Mar 2014 17:52:58 -0800 (PST)
Received: from fr712usmtp2.zeu.alcatel-lucent.com (h135-239-2-42.lucent.com [135.239.2.42]) by hoemail2.alcatel.com (8.13.8/IER-o) with ESMTP id s291qlSe018117 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Sat, 8 Mar 2014 19:52:48 -0600 (CST)
Received: from FR712WXCHHUB03.zeu.alcatel-lucent.com (fr712wxchhub03.zeu.alcatel-lucent.com [135.239.2.74]) by fr712usmtp2.zeu.alcatel-lucent.com (GMO) with ESMTP id s291qjfX014126 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL); Sun, 9 Mar 2014 02:52:45 +0100
Received: from FR712WXCHMBA11.zeu.alcatel-lucent.com ([169.254.7.26]) by FR712WXCHHUB03.zeu.alcatel-lucent.com ([135.239.2.74]) with mapi id 14.02.0247.003; Sun, 9 Mar 2014 02:52:45 +0100
From: "DRAGE, Keith (Keith)" <keith.drage@alcatel-lucent.com>
To: Christer Holmberg <christer.holmberg@ericsson.com>, "t.p." <daedulus@btconnect.com>, "Murphy, Sandra" <Sandra.Murphy@parsons.com>, "89attendees@ietf.org" <89attendees@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [89attendees] unlawful in Britain to carry pocketknives that lock
Thread-Index: AQHPOs/omAxWI/UoFEu5TdC8tvvotJrXKe6AgAB8mQA=
Date: Sun, 09 Mar 2014 01:52:45 +0000
Message-ID: <949EF20990823C4C85C18D59AA11AD8B146B1B@FR712WXCHMBA11.zeu.alcatel-lucent.com>
References: <24B20D14B2CD29478C8D5D6E9CBB29F694A07C5D@HSV-MB001.huntsville.ads.sparta.com> <066201cf3acf$216f0940$4001a8c0@gateway.2wire.net> <7594FB04B1934943A5C02806D1A2204B1D1DB2FF@ESESSMB209.ericsson.se>
In-Reply-To: <7594FB04B1934943A5C02806D1A2204B1D1DB2FF@ESESSMB209.ericsson.se>
Accept-Language: en-GB, en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [135.239.27.40]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/89attendees/6Z8t7PI6ZXavuwn3CSY7dGz1Q9c
Subject: Re: [89attendees] unlawful in Britain to carry pocketknives that lock
X-BeenThere: 89attendees@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Mailing list of IETF 89 attendees that have opted in to the list." <89attendees.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/89attendees>, <mailto:89attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/89attendees/>
List-Post: <mailto:89attendees@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:89attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/89attendees>, <mailto:89attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 09 Mar 2014 01:53:01 -0000

It is surely reasonable to be expected to know something of the law of the countries you are visiting. There is no need for the IETF to have to warn of this. Most governments have web pages that give a simple summary of the law and this is hardly hidden (as already identified):

https://www.gov.uk/find-out-if-i-can-buy-or-carry-a-knife

In general in England and Wales it is illegal to carry anything in public that can be regarded as an offensive weapon. It is not reasonable to carry any weapon for "protection". And if you need to carry tools for your trade that might be construed as a offensive weapon, you are best to lock them away out of sight.

However I doubt whether your colleague will suffer the full weight of the law of a 4 year prison sentence and a £5000 fine. I suspect in this case he will hear no more about it.

Maybe this is why our rate for unlawful killing 1.0 per 100 000 rather than 4.7 per 100 000, and still too high.

Regards

Keith 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: 89attendees [mailto:89attendees-bounces@ietf.org] On 
> Behalf Of Christer Holmberg
> Sent: 08 March 2014 14:10
> To: t.p.; Murphy, Sandra; 89attendees@ietf.org
> Subject: Re: [89attendees] unlawful in Britain to carry 
> pocketknives that lock
> 
> Hi,
> 
> >> The security check at the London Eye discovered that one of the 
> >> members of our group carried a pocketknife.  The 
> pocketknife was the 
> >> safety type, where the blade locks to prevent self-injury.
> >>
> >> Turns out that locking blade pocketknives are illegal in Britain.  
> >> The knife was confiscated and a form had to be filled out 
> with name, 
> >> address, age and place of birth (one presumes to identify 
> a passport number).  The form will be turned over to the police.
> >>
> >> Did this info get mentioned on the attendee list?  I do not recall 
> >> seeing it, but I might not have paid attention.  And I'm 
> apologize if 
> >> this is common knowledge that no one would have thought 
> worth mentioning.
> >
> > Yes, it is so common knowledge in England that I would 
> never have thought to mention it (although > would in future, 
> now you point it out).
> > Thinking about it, guns are mercifully rare in this 
> country, compared 
> > to what I understand the situation is in America, so the 
> young on the 
> > rampage go shanked or bladed; most of the more notorious 
> street crime 
> > is committed with a blade, not a gun, and I think that the 
> evolution of the law over the past decade or so reflects that.
> >
> > Drugs are another area where the law of England might catch 
> visitors out but I would expect that to > be more self-evident.
> 
> I don't think anyone should have a responsibility to inform 
> people of these kind of things, unless someone asks. 
> 
> If someone travels to an IETF meeting in a foreign country, 
> it is his/her responsibility to figure out about the local 
> laws - at least if he/she is planning to wear knives, use 
> drugs, and/or perform any other activity that has nothing to 
> do with the IETF meeting. 
> 
> Otherwise, one may get a learn-it-the-hard-way reminder that 
> things aren't always the same as home :)
> 
> Regards,
> 
> Christer
> 
> _______________________________________________
> 89attendees mailing list
> 89attendees@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/89attendees
>