Re: [89attendees] Hilton receipt (not)

"Mishra, Sanjay" <sanjay.mishra@verizon.com> Sun, 09 March 2014 02:00 UTC

Return-Path: <sanjay.mishra@verizon.com>
X-Original-To: 89attendees@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: 89attendees@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 43C6F1A0306 for <89attendees@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 8 Mar 2014 18:00:56 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.601
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.601 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id sSJRmUXlLLyj for <89attendees@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 8 Mar 2014 18:00:54 -0800 (PST)
Received: from omzsmtpe03.verizonbusiness.com (omzsmtpe03.verizonbusiness.com [199.249.25.208]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 825AE1A0301 for <89attendees@ietf.org>; Sat, 8 Mar 2014 18:00:54 -0800 (PST)
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: false
Received: from unknown (HELO fldsmtpi03.verizon.com) ([166.68.71.145]) by omzsmtpe03.verizonbusiness.com with ESMTP; 09 Mar 2014 02:00:47 +0000
From: "Mishra, Sanjay" <sanjay.mishra@verizon.com>
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.97,616,1389744000"; d="scan'208";a="670682764"
Received: from fhdp1lumxc7hb02.verizon.com (HELO FHDP1LUMXC7HB02.us.one.verizon.com) ([166.68.59.189]) by fldsmtpi03.verizon.com with ESMTP; 09 Mar 2014 02:00:47 +0000
Received: from fhdp1lumxc7v23.us.one.verizon.com ([166.68.59.159]) by FHDP1LUMXC7HB02.us.one.verizon.com ([166.68.59.189]) with mapi; Sat, 8 Mar 2014 21:00:47 -0500
To: Tim Chown <tjc@ecs.soton.ac.uk>, Jon Hudson <jon.hudson@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 08 Mar 2014 21:00:46 -0500
Thread-Topic: [89attendees] Hilton receipt (not)
Thread-Index: Ac862B3LtUblgfbIR6uBAjKzG3hOAgAYSbEA
Message-ID: <900A1E2059ADB149B905E3C8FA0046A62C8B259522@FHDP1LUMXC7V23.us.one.verizon.com>
References: <531ABAFB.4050001@gmail.com> <CAA=duU2j_HuJ5Qmjord4_uZXEeJMVGP4ZUdB17RmZXOusjB0Uw@mail.gmail.com> <531AE952.2090401@cisco.com> <5A632E6E-7613-44CA-8470-54B833231ABC@juniper.net> <alpine.DEB.2.02.1403081207050.747@uplift.swm.pp.se> <C94225C6-1E4C-44D8-9C6F-16425DB90B6C@gmail.com> <40155F40-ED19-4EC3-BBC1-5859D6591D03@ecs.soton.ac.uk> <EMEW3|4f1fdc9d4fac79e68305d030fe5729f6q27E9l03tjc|ecs.soton.ac.uk|40155F40-ED19-4EC3-BBC1-5859D6591D03@ecs.soton.ac.uk>
In-Reply-To: <EMEW3|4f1fdc9d4fac79e68305d030fe5729f6q27E9l03tjc|ecs.soton.ac.uk|40155F40-ED19-4EC3-BBC1-5859D6591D03@ecs.soton.ac.uk>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
acceptlanguage: en-US
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/89attendees/Cx5B7m0rUvi9FIvgDI3WXLyc9ug
Cc: "89attendees@ietf.org" <89attendees@ietf.org>, Mikael Abrahamsson <swmike@swm.pp.se>
Subject: Re: [89attendees] Hilton receipt (not)
X-BeenThere: 89attendees@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Mailing list of IETF 89 attendees that have opted in to the list." <89attendees.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/89attendees>, <mailto:89attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/89attendees/>
List-Post: <mailto:89attendees@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:89attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/89attendees>, <mailto:89attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 09 Mar 2014 02:00:56 -0000

For me the checkout bill for #of nights I stayed was correct (plus tax) but there was a charge added for use of beverages (4 instances) from the Refrigerator, which in my case was not correct. I than stopped by the reception and notified of the erroneous charges. The receptionist, first, removed the charges promptly and second, also advised he will have housekeeping verify use (or lack thereof). I asked how could the charges appears when no beverage is/was used, the receptionist stated that there (apparently) are sensors that would trigger charges if items are touched or moved. In my case, I did keep water and yoghurt so I presume things were likely touched but I just don't know enough of the details on the sensors to be sure how all this works. 

In the end, the housekeeping concurred no use of beverage but still puzzled on the sensor part.

-Sanjay-

-----Original Message-----
From: 89attendees [mailto:89attendees-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Tim Chown
Sent: Saturday, March 08, 2014 9:09 AM
To: Jon Hudson
Cc: 89attendees@ietf.org; Mikael Abrahamsson
Subject: Re: [89attendees] Hilton receipt (not)

Checkout was a bit of a mess.

It seemed the 'under the door' thing was just 'for info' so you had to actually check out.

I also got an email with an 'estimate' of the bill, not an invoice.

When I went to check out at the desk I negotiated a reduction for the lack of hot water, was told I'd get sent a revised copy of the actual invoice that I'd be charged after the reduction, and have since heard nothing.

So I may have a free stay, a reduced stay, or a full price stay. I have no idea.

Tim

On 8 Mar 2014, at 11:32, Jon Hudson <jon.hudson@gmail.com> wrote:

> 
> When I checked out
> 
> 1.) nothing under the door 
> 2.) rate was right, but they charged me 2x for each day. 
> 
> But were very nice about it, once I showed them the mistake. 
> 
> Jon
> 
>> On Mar 8, 2014, at 11:10 AM, Mikael Abrahamsson <swmike@swm.pp.se> wrote:
>> 
>>> On Sat, 8 Mar 2014, Kireeti Kompella wrote:
>>> 
>>> I had a thirty pound bar bill that it took 15 minutes to resolve. A pain, but they were able to pull out the receipt and verify that the name and signature didn't match.
>> 
>> I checked in Sunday (March 2nd) and checked out Friday. I have a ~1150 GBP reservation on my credit card from march 3rd, and I have a ~23 GBP reservation from March 6th, my checkout receipt says 864 GBP and they claimed they had no room charges on record for me.
>> 
>> This is potentially going to get interesting (... or rather, tedious).
>> 
>> I'll report back mid next week in case this didn't recify itself automagically.
>> 
>> -- 
>> Mikael Abrahamsson    email: swmike@swm.pp.se
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> 89attendees mailing list
>> 89attendees@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/89attendees
> 
> _______________________________________________
> 89attendees mailing list
> 89attendees@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/89attendees

_______________________________________________
89attendees mailing list
89attendees@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/89attendees