IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [89attendees] Hilton receipt (not)

"John G. Scudder" <jgs@juniper.net> Mon, 10 March 2014 13:39 UTC

Return-Path: <jgs@juniper.net>
X-Original-To: 89attendees@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: 89attendees@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C37E71A0434 for <89attendees@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 10 Mar 2014 06:39:37 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 63bi_yTGFf27 for <89attendees@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 10 Mar 2014 06:39:35 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from tx2outboundpool.messaging.microsoft.com (tx2ehsobe004.messaging.microsoft.com [65.55.88.14]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 598241A042A for <89attendees@ietf.org>; Mon, 10 Mar 2014 06:39:34 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail224-tx2-R.bigfish.com (10.9.14.239) by TX2EHSOBE001.bigfish.com (10.9.40.21) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.1.225.22; Mon, 10 Mar 2014 13:39:29 +0000
Received: from mail224-tx2 (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail224-tx2-R.bigfish.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5FC1EA00181 for <89attendees@ietf.org>; Mon, 10 Mar 2014 13:39:29 +0000 (UTC)
X-Forefront-Antispam-Report: CIP:157.56.240.101; KIP:(null); UIP:(null); IPV:NLI; H:BL2PRD0510HT004.namprd05.prod.outlook.com; RD:none; EFVD:NLI
X-SpamScore: -1
X-BigFish: VPS-1(z4b6Iz98dI9371Ic85fh1432Izz1f42h208ch1ee6h1de0h1fdah2073h2146h1202h1e76h2189h1d1ah1d2ah21bch1fc6h1082kzc2hz8275ch1de098h1de097hz2fh2a8h839hd25he5bhf0ah1288h12a5h12bdh137ah139eh1441h14ddh1504h1537h162dh1631h1662h1758h1898h18e1h1946h19b5h19ceh1ad9h1b0ah1b2bh1bceh224fh1d0ch1d2eh1d3fh1dfeh1dffh1e1dh1e23h1fe8h1ff5h2052h20b3h20f0h2218h2216h226dh22d0h24afh2327h2336h2438h2461h2487h24d7h2516h2545h255eh25cch25f6h2605h1155h)
Received-SPF: pass (mail224-tx2: domain of juniper.net designates 157.56.240.101 as permitted sender) client-ip=157.56.240.101; envelope-from=jgs@juniper.net; helo=BL2PRD0510HT004.namprd05.prod.outlook.com ; .outlook.com ;
X-Forefront-Antispam-Report-Untrusted: SFV:NSPM; SFS:(10009001)(428001)(199002)(189002)(377454003)(51704005)(12063002)(24454002)(66066001)(51856001)(42186004)(69226001)(65816001)(80022001)(53806001)(74502001)(46102001)(47446002)(88136002)(76482001)(74662001)(57306001)(31966008)(54316002)(87976001)(83716003)(74876001)(87286001)(87266001)(53416003)(74706001)(1941001)(4396001)(84326002)(56776001)(85306002)(74366001)(76796001)(76786001)(47736001)(77096001)(50226001)(47976001)(49866001)(50986001)(33656001)(77156001)(80976001)(83322001)(19580395003)(19580405001)(83072002)(85852003)(79102001)(94946001)(59766001)(77982001)(97186001)(97336001)(92566001)(93136001)(92726001)(86362001)(94316002)(93916002)(93516002)(81816001)(81686001)(512954002)(82746002)(36756003)(62966002)(71186001)(90146001)(63696002)(81342001)(95416001)(56816005)(81542001)(69556001)(89996001)(95666003)(42262001); DIR:OUT; SFP:1101; SCL:1; SRVR:DM2PR05MB735; H:jgs-sslvpn-nc.jnpr.net; CLIP:66.129.241.12; FPR:B8BCFD38.A326AF99.FDE3939D.88EBE04C.201CB; PTR:InfoNoRecords; A:1; MX:1; LANG:en;
Received: from mail224-tx2 (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by mail224-tx2 (MessageSwitch) id 1394458766960275_24579; Mon, 10 Mar 2014 13:39:26 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from TX2EHSMHS028.bigfish.com (unknown [10.9.14.233]) by mail224-tx2.bigfish.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E5813A0070 for <89attendees@ietf.org>; Mon, 10 Mar 2014 13:39:26 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from BL2PRD0510HT004.namprd05.prod.outlook.com (157.56.240.101) by TX2EHSMHS028.bigfish.com (10.9.99.128) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.16.227.3; Mon, 10 Mar 2014 13:39:25 +0000
Received: from DM2PR05MB735.namprd05.prod.outlook.com (10.141.178.24) by BL2PRD0510HT004.namprd05.prod.outlook.com (10.255.100.39) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.16.423.0; Mon, 10 Mar 2014 13:39:25 +0000
Received: from jgs-sslvpn-nc.jnpr.net (66.129.241.12) by DM2PR05MB735.namprd05.prod.outlook.com (10.141.178.24) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.893.10; Mon, 10 Mar 2014 13:39:23 +0000
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_5A722EAA-6946-432F-A5A3-FF1277C5C623"
MIME-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 7.2 \(1874\))
From: "John G. Scudder" <jgs@juniper.net>
In-Reply-To: <CF43B0F7.3EC20%pravinb@juniper.net>
Date: Mon, 10 Mar 2014 14:39:12 +0100
Message-ID: <61C55A38-E36F-4900-AA08-180EE6694637@juniper.net>
References: <CF43B0F7.3EC20%pravinb@juniper.net>
To: Pravin Bhandarkar <pravinb@juniper.net>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1874)
X-Originating-IP: [66.129.241.12]
X-ClientProxiedBy: BLUPR08CA015.namprd08.prod.outlook.com (10.141.30.35) To DM2PR05MB735.namprd05.prod.outlook.com (10.141.178.24)
X-Forefront-PRVS: 014617085B
X-OriginatorOrg: juniper.net
X-FOPE-CONNECTOR: Id%0$Dn%*$RO%0$TLS%0$FQDN%$TlsDn%
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/89attendees/KuZWTGZQzJWNqmZBQpOaWxWxq2w
Cc: "89attendees@ietf.org" <89attendees@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [89attendees] Hilton receipt (not)
X-BeenThere: 89attendees@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Mailing list of IETF 89 attendees that have opted in to the list." <89attendees.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/89attendees>, <mailto:89attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/89attendees/>
List-Post: <mailto:89attendees@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:89attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/89attendees>, <mailto:89attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 10 Mar 2014 13:39:38 -0000

In my experience the minibar sensors are ubiquitous throughout the world and are uniformly bad, to the extent that front desk staff commonly cancel disputed minibar charges without a second thought. (As happened to me this stay.)

There's probably a lesson to be learned there, somewhere.

--John

On Mar 10, 2014, at 1:46 PM, Pravin Bhandarkar <pravinb@juniper.net> wrote:

> The sensor in the fridge is really sensitive. To be triggered one does not
> have to open the door even an accidental brush against the wooden cabinet
> during movement in the room (especially in the twin) or similar brush
> during house keeping can trigger billing. Amazing that they invested in
> the sensor technology when in fact the rooms could have done with a more
> contemporary upgrade.
> 
> Regards,
> 
> Pravin
[...]

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email