Re: [89attendees] Hilton receipt (not)

"Carlos M. Martinez" <carlos@lacnic.net> Fri, 14 March 2014 16:39 UTC

Return-Path: <carlos@lacnic.net>
X-Original-To: 89attendees@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: 89attendees@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DC88E1A017F for <89attendees@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 14 Mar 2014 09:39:53 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id sN_Tk1hrlxeh for <89attendees@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 14 Mar 2014 09:39:51 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.lacnic.net.uy (mail.lacnic.net.uy [IPv6:2001:13c7:7001:4000::3]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EDC141A01A8 for <89attendees@ietf.org>; Fri, 14 Mar 2014 09:39:16 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from 87-7-200.lacnic.net.uy (unknown [IPv6:2001:13c7:7001:7000:8d0f:d439:aeb8:1050]) by mail.lacnic.net.uy (Postfix) with ESMTP id 14CB3308451; Fri, 14 Mar 2014 13:38:29 -0300 (UYT)
Message-ID: <532330AA.6090001@lacnic.net>
Date: Fri, 14 Mar 2014 13:39:06 -0300
From: "Carlos M. Martinez" <carlos@lacnic.net>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.9; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.3.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Paul Kyzivat <pkyzivat@alum.mit.edu>, 89attendees@ietf.org
References: <531ABAFB.4050001@gmail.com> <CAA=duU2j_HuJ5Qmjord4_uZXEeJMVGP4ZUdB17RmZXOusjB0Uw@mail.gmail.com>, <531AE952.2090401@cisco.com> <5A632E6E-7613-44CA-8470-54B833231ABC@juniper.net> <alpine.DEB.2.02.1403081207050.747@uplift.swm.pp.se> <alpine.DEB.2.02.1403141625170.747@uplift.swm.pp.se> <53232401.4030808@alum.mit.edu>
In-Reply-To: <53232401.4030808@alum.mit.edu>
X-Enigmail-Version: 1.6
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-LACNIC.uy-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information
X-LACNIC.uy-MailScanner: Found to be clean
X-LACNIC.uy-MailScanner-SpamCheck:
X-LACNIC.uy-MailScanner-From: carlos@lacnic.net
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/89attendees/FNGyoiX6gEj754t-Mi22X-uIb80
Subject: Re: [89attendees] Hilton receipt (not)
X-BeenThere: 89attendees@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Mailing list of IETF 89 attendees that have opted in to the list." <89attendees.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/89attendees>, <mailto:89attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/89attendees/>
List-Post: <mailto:89attendees@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:89attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/89attendees>, <mailto:89attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 14 Mar 2014 16:39:54 -0000

A Hilton/Intercontinental classic. Same thing happened to me in the past
with both chains.

The hot water one is new though.

On 3/14/14, 12:45 PM, Paul Kyzivat wrote:
> In my case, they charged my credit card for the full estimated amount
> of the stay on the day I checked in. (Not just a hold, an actual charge.)
>
> When I went to check out, I wanted to pay part of the bill in cash (to
> use up the cash rather than having to convert it), and they had to
> issue a credit to my card to do that.
>
> Very improper approach.
>
>     Thanks,
>     Paul
>
> On 3/14/14 11:27 AM, Mikael Abrahamsson wrote:
>> On Sat, 8 Mar 2014, Mikael Abrahamsson wrote:
>>
>>> On Sat, 8 Mar 2014, Kireeti Kompella wrote:
>>>
>>>> I had a thirty pound bar bill that it took 15 minutes to resolve. A
>>>> pain, but they were able to pull out the receipt and verify that the
>>>> name and signature didn't match.
>>>
>>> I checked in Sunday (March 2nd) and checked out Friday. I have a ~1150
>>> GBP reservation on my credit card from march 3rd, and I have a ~23 GBP
>>> reservation from March 6th, my checkout receipt says 864 GBP and they
>>> claimed they had no room charges on record for me.
>>>
>>> This is potentially going to get interesting (... or rather, tedious).
>>>
>>> I'll report back mid next week in case this didn't recify itself
>>> automagically.
>>
>> It's now end of business week a week later. The ~23GBP transaction is
>> gone. A new transaction of 864GBP has been logged as fully paid and
>> charged on the 6th, and the ~1100GBP is still reserved on my credit card
>> from the 3rd.
>>
>> I have filled out the customer satisfaction survey with ratings that
>> match my customer experience with this hotel.
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> 89attendees mailing list
> 89attendees@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/89attendees