Re: [89attendees] Hilton receipt (not)
"Scheffenegger, Richard" <rs@netapp.com> Mon, 10 March 2014 14:12 UTC
Return-Path: <rs@netapp.com>
X-Original-To: 89attendees@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: 89attendees@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3268A1A048A for <89attendees@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 10 Mar 2014 07:12:41 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -7.448
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.448 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.547, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id qq1Rlwtpjxnc for <89attendees@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 10 Mar 2014 07:12:39 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx12.netapp.com (mx12.netapp.com [216.240.18.77]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CD9D11A0473 for <89attendees@ietf.org>; Mon, 10 Mar 2014 07:12:38 -0700 (PDT)
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos; i="4.97,624,1389772800"; d="scan'208,217"; a="148808577"
Received: from vmwexceht02-prd.hq.netapp.com ([10.106.76.240]) by mx12-out.netapp.com with ESMTP; 10 Mar 2014 07:12:33 -0700
Received: from SACEXCMBX02-PRD.hq.netapp.com ([169.254.1.77]) by vmwexceht02-prd.hq.netapp.com ([10.106.76.240]) with mapi id 14.03.0123.003; Mon, 10 Mar 2014 07:12:33 -0700
From: "Scheffenegger, Richard" <rs@netapp.com>
To: "John G. Scudder" <jgs@juniper.net>
Thread-Topic: [89attendees] Hilton receipt (not)
Thread-Index: AQHPOpkTXLOZh7ulpUiHVmvWIE8YmJrXWH4AgAAhzACAABIGgIAAArGAgAAGJoCAACuHAIAAxwEAgAI2DACAAA6pAP//k/lJ
Date: Mon, 10 Mar 2014 14:12:33 +0000
Message-ID: <463D6D59-73DB-4CB5-B769-5CC0B948D0C0@netapp.com>
References: <CF43B0F7.3EC20%pravinb@juniper.net>, <61C55A38-E36F-4900-AA08-180EE6694637@juniper.net>
In-Reply-To: <61C55A38-E36F-4900-AA08-180EE6694637@juniper.net>
Accept-Language: de-AT, en-US
Content-Language: de-DE
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_463D6D5973DB4CB5B7695CC0B948D0C0netappcom_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/89attendees/FthHbKpDasv5jkYq5xcpWhvvDFc
Cc: Pravin Bhandarkar <pravinb@juniper.net>, "89attendees@ietf.org" <89attendees@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [89attendees] Hilton receipt (not)
X-BeenThere: 89attendees@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Mailing list of IETF 89 attendees that have opted in to the list." <89attendees.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/89attendees>, <mailto:89attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/89attendees/>
List-Post: <mailto:89attendees@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:89attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/89attendees>, <mailto:89attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 10 Mar 2014 14:12:41 -0000
That enough people don't care and these sensors still pay themselves? :) Btw, i also kept stuff in the fridge, but apparently i treat things gentle enough that i didn't trip a sensor... The paper beneath the door was accurate (to the extent the hotel had te info) but not a proper invoice. The person at reception actually had a free text word doc to modify the receipt in whatever way necessary. Regards Richard Am 10.03.2014 um 14:40 schrieb "John G. Scudder" <jgs@juniper.net<mailto:jgs@juniper.net>>: In my experience the minibar sensors are ubiquitous throughout the world and are uniformly bad, to the extent that front desk staff commonly cancel disputed minibar charges without a second thought. (As happened to me this stay.) There's probably a lesson to be learned there, somewhere. --John On Mar 10, 2014, at 1:46 PM, Pravin Bhandarkar <pravinb@juniper.net<mailto:pravinb@juniper.net>> wrote: The sensor in the fridge is really sensitive. To be triggered one does not have to open the door even an accidental brush against the wooden cabinet during movement in the room (especially in the twin) or similar brush during house keeping can trigger billing. Amazing that they invested in the sensor technology when in fact the rooms could have done with a more contemporary upgrade. Regards, Pravin [...] _______________________________________________ 89attendees mailing list 89attendees@ietf.org<mailto:89attendees@ietf.org> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/89attendees
- [89attendees] Hilton receipt (not) Brian E Carpenter
- Re: [89attendees] Hilton receipt (not) Andrew G. Malis
- Re: [89attendees] Hilton receipt (not) Stewart Bryant
- Re: [89attendees] Hilton receipt (not) Kireeti Kompella
- Re: [89attendees] Hilton receipt (not) David Misell
- Re: [89attendees] Hilton receipt (not) Mikael Abrahamsson
- Re: [89attendees] Hilton receipt (not) Jon Hudson
- Re: [89attendees] Hilton receipt (not) Tim Chown
- Re: [89attendees] Hilton receipt (not) Mishra, Sanjay
- Re: [89attendees] Hilton receipt (not) Bob Hinden
- [89attendees] Overall [was: Hilton receipt (not)] Brian E Carpenter
- Re: [89attendees] Overall [was: Hilton receipt (n… Bob Hinden
- Re: [89attendees] Overall [was: Hilton receipt (n… Tim Chown
- Re: [89attendees] Hilton receipt (not) Pravin Bhandarkar
- Re: [89attendees] Hilton receipt (not) John G. Scudder
- Re: [89attendees] Hilton receipt (not) Scheffenegger, Richard
- Re: [89attendees] Hilton receipt (not) Robert Moskowitz
- Re: [89attendees] Hilton receipt (not) Mikael Abrahamsson
- Re: [89attendees] Hilton receipt (not) Tim Chown
- Re: [89attendees] Hilton receipt (not) Paul Kyzivat
- Re: [89attendees] Hilton receipt (not) Carlos M. Martinez
- Re: [89attendees] Hilton receipt (not) Robert Moskowitz