IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Ace] Adoption of Low Latency Group Communication Security Work in ACE

Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org> Thu, 21 July 2016 09:27 UTC

Return-Path: <cabo@tzi.org>
X-Original-To: ace@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ace@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A155012DC56 for <ace@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 21 Jul 2016 02:27:28 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.6
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 3W03x3za4XW0 for <ace@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 21 Jul 2016 02:27:27 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from relay5-d.mail.gandi.net (relay5-d.mail.gandi.net [IPv6:2001:4b98:c:538::197]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0FEC412DC43 for <Ace@ietf.org>; Thu, 21 Jul 2016 02:27:27 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mfilter31-d.gandi.net (mfilter31-d.gandi.net [217.70.178.162]) by relay5-d.mail.gandi.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 75AD841C09B; Thu, 21 Jul 2016 11:27:25 +0200 (CEST)
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at mfilter31-d.gandi.net
Received: from relay5-d.mail.gandi.net ([IPv6:::ffff:217.70.183.197]) by mfilter31-d.gandi.net (mfilter31-d.gandi.net [::ffff:10.0.15.180]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id PRHKTPGqO4GR; Thu, 21 Jul 2016 11:26:53 +0200 (CEST)
X-Originating-IP: 31.133.154.74
Received: from dhcp-9a4a.meeting.ietf.org (dhcp-9a4a.meeting.ietf.org [31.133.154.74]) (Authenticated sender: cabo@cabo.im) by relay5-d.mail.gandi.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id B362D41C089; Thu, 21 Jul 2016 11:26:51 +0200 (CEST)
Message-ID: <57909559.2000805@tzi.org>
Date: Thu, 21 Jul 2016 11:26:49 +0200
From: Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org>
User-Agent: Postbox 4.0.8 (Macintosh/20151105)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
References: <578F4D59.8050005@gmx.net> <5E393DF26B791A428E5F003BB6C5342AB3716D64@OC11EXPO33.exchange.mit.edu> <23666.1469091857@obiwan.sandelman.ca>
In-Reply-To: <23666.1469091857@obiwan.sandelman.ca>
X-Enigmail-Version: 1.2.3
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ace/-iOC-hJC1aDya59Y0SkvnZ3rFjo>
Cc: "Ace@ietf.org" <Ace@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Ace] Adoption of Low Latency Group Communication Security Work in ACE
X-BeenThere: ace@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Authentication and Authorization for Constrained Environments \(ace\)" <ace.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ace>, <mailto:ace-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ace/>
List-Post: <mailto:ace@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ace-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ace>, <mailto:ace-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 21 Jul 2016 09:27:28 -0000

Michael Richardson wrote:
> Why will ACE succeed when DICE failed?

Because DICE tried to hack something into TLS.  That had no support.

> Does ACE now have some knowledge or mechanism that DICE couldn't have created
> because it was out of scope?

ACE has COSE.

Grüße, Carsten

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email