Re: [Ace] Adoption of Low Latency Group Communication Security Work in ACE

["Kumar, Sandeep" <[e-mail]>]

+1 in favor of doing the work in ACE. There is a clear need in the lighting industry (but also others like window blinds) where low latency (human noticeable delay of around 200 ms) needs to be protected with an appropriate type of security. There are differences in opinion what current or near future hardware can support and we need to get more clarity on that (not just from one single vendor).

Sandeep

-----Original Message-----
From: Ace [mailto:[e-mail]] On Behalf Of Hannes Tschofenig
Sent: Wednesday, July 20, 2016 12:07 PM
To: [e-mail]
Subject: [Ace] Adoption of Low Latency Group Communication Security Work in ACE

Hi all,

at the ACE meeting today I asked the participants whether they are in favor of adding low latency group communication security work in the ACE group.

20 persons were in favor of doing the work.

5 people argued against doing this work.

If you haven't been at the meeting please contribute your thoughts here on the list. If you believe you do not have enough information please also speak up.

Ciao
Hannes


________________________________
The information contained in this message may be confidential and legally protected under applicable law. The message is intended solely for the addressee(s). If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any use, forwarding, dissemination, or reproduction of this message is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by return e-mail and destroy all copies of the original message.