Re: [Ace] Adoption of Low Latency Group Communication Security Work in ACE

Eliot Lear <lear@cisco.com> Mon, 25 July 2016 18:23 UTC

Return-Path: <lear@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: ace@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ace@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 770A812D977 for <ace@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 25 Jul 2016 11:23:04 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -15.809
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-15.809 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-1.287, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 3apfsw5Z5Vgj for <ace@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 25 Jul 2016 11:23:03 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from aer-iport-1.cisco.com (aer-iport-1.cisco.com [173.38.203.51]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EB8EA12D968 for <ace@ietf.org>; Mon, 25 Jul 2016 11:23:02 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=2338; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1469470983; x=1470680583; h=subject:to:references:from:message-id:date:mime-version: in-reply-to; bh=oawnb5Rz7iDDtJKoZJHPma30uF9BrnLoD26yWf73hcA=; b=guHQDYvnvWqftBoEqPgQ+Je5YbgZ2twua9QgEKALNpywmNwU3wxc5xbq D36j9OJF1CP0iaTKalj7DeRobODvQGUyT7zZDsGUxIDwKMAHEqL4lLBIc mokN35W9/MrgoPehYNUpE7/LAgznYcsJC10Yfa6mcqoNHSwubI1fwbv4w E=;
X-Files: signature.asc : 481
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A0DCBABbWJZX/xbLJq1chD+7NoYdAoF8EAEBAQEBAQFdJ4RdAQUjZgsYKgICVwYBDAgBAYgsqAGNWwEBAQEBAQQBAQEBAQEBEg6IIoJVh0GCWgEEmSiDOYFwiUaBVgGHfYVrkCE1H4N1Ook/AQEB
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.28,420,1464652800"; d="asc'?scan'208";a="678984532"
Received: from aer-iport-nat.cisco.com (HELO aer-core-4.cisco.com) ([173.38.203.22]) by aer-iport-1.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 25 Jul 2016 18:23:01 +0000
Received: from [10.61.72.235] (ams3-vpn-dhcp2283.cisco.com [10.61.72.235]) by aer-core-4.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id u6PIN0jl011571; Mon, 25 Jul 2016 18:23:01 GMT
To: Michael StJohns <mstjohns@comcast.net>, Somaraju Abhinav <abhinav.somaraju@tridonic.com>, "ace@ietf.org" <ace@ietf.org>
References: <578F4D59.8050005@gmx.net> <5E393DF26B791A428E5F003BB6C5342AB3716D64@OC11EXPO33.exchange.mit.edu> <23666.1469091857@obiwan.sandelman.ca> <95b0103c-ba2d-6cd8-6241-228df46e530b@sics.se> <8ca27108-a8b9-7b07-e752-656247716708@comcast.net> <HE1PR0601MB22030003D2913DA6096CB3E4FC0D0@HE1PR0601MB2203.eurprd06.prod.outlook.com> <a318cda7-ebf2-5a5c-d86a-9d67fb41a82f@comcast.net> <HE1PR0601MB2203D1C2C96278B23D71AD31FC0D0@HE1PR0601MB2203.eurprd06.prod.outlook.com> <374883b2-f69f-e36b-8b56-92cae2a0e1c6@comcast.net>
From: Eliot Lear <lear@cisco.com>
Message-ID: <3d753504-a252-f181-dfb2-576a7ad322b4@cisco.com>
Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2016 20:23:00 +0200
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.11; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.2.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <374883b2-f69f-e36b-8b56-92cae2a0e1c6@comcast.net>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg="pgp-sha256"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="8s4hoCn4GavXcfUPd6wDJxBkvBfX8DHe5"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ace/Y6X-qsWggSONimwR0Lwrg-8nN7g>
Subject: Re: [Ace] Adoption of Low Latency Group Communication Security Work in ACE
X-BeenThere: ace@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Authentication and Authorization for Constrained Environments \(ace\)" <ace.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ace>, <mailto:ace-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ace/>
List-Post: <mailto:ace@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ace-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ace>, <mailto:ace-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2016 18:23:04 -0000


On 7/25/16 8:07 PM, Michael StJohns wrote:
>
> The receiver has no guaranteed way of knowing whether or not ANY group
> member is compromised so the authentication is pretty much meaningless.

I would just add that it is also more difficult to determine just which
device has been broken into after the fact.

Eliot