Re: [Ace] Adoption of Low Latency Group Communication Security Work in ACE

Eliot Lear <lear@cisco.com> Tue, 26 July 2016 16:10 UTC

Return-Path: <lear@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: ace@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ace@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7364112D898 for <ace@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 26 Jul 2016 09:10:28 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -15.808
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-15.808 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-1.287, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id W7Q76-CvtzLo for <ace@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 26 Jul 2016 09:10:26 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from aer-iport-1.cisco.com (aer-iport-1.cisco.com [173.38.203.51]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0989E12DB59 for <ace@ietf.org>; Tue, 26 Jul 2016 08:59:30 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=4736; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1469548771; x=1470758371; h=subject:to:references:cc:from:message-id:date: mime-version:in-reply-to; bh=IUss8swo3pElqknhjOxt5op25A0yzoVVTrYdTVnjruA=; b=FLyEV0C7owQd/IlSS30KFFQF9UxFI8XiCnxm/pt+pcVw5DRlZSv/3fdS YPiCsWbQ1CfjGJ4VxrN5qpCwN4Az6xv4zZKSZ1Fdn+hR8QuhPoCUR+7uU fMK0+q7k1QaT7urFIgXRitaj6oA7pTVuYiMUANAe4/YBsBP+eXsMQy2kf Y=;
X-Files: signature.asc : 481
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A0DGCQDhh5dX/xbLJq1ehD+0S4cChh0CgXQQAQEBAQEBAV0nhF0BBSNWEAsEARMqAgJXBg0IAQGILas8jWEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEODogiCIJNh0GCWgEEmTGDOoFwiVGJVIVrkCU1H4N6Ooh7AQEB
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.28,425,1464652800"; d="asc'?scan'208,217";a="679113827"
Received: from aer-iport-nat.cisco.com (HELO aer-core-3.cisco.com) ([173.38.203.22]) by aer-iport-1.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 26 Jul 2016 15:59:29 +0000
Received: from [10.61.230.130] ([10.61.230.130]) by aer-core-3.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id u6QFxSWo007437; Tue, 26 Jul 2016 15:59:28 GMT
To: Kathleen Moriarty <kathleen.moriarty.ietf@gmail.com>, "Kumar, Sandeep" <sandeep.kumar@philips.com>
References: <578F4D59.8050005@gmx.net> <5E393DF26B791A428E5F003BB6C5342AB3716D64@OC11EXPO33.exchange.mit.edu> <23666.1469091857@obiwan.sandelman.ca> <95b0103c-ba2d-6cd8-6241-228df46e530b@sics.se> <8ca27108-a8b9-7b07-e752-656247716708@comcast.net> <HE1PR0601MB22030003D2913DA6096CB3E4FC0D0@HE1PR0601MB2203.eurprd06.prod.outlook.com> <a318cda7-ebf2-5a5c-d86a-9d67fb41a82f@comcast.net> <HE1PR0601MB2203D1C2C96278B23D71AD31FC0D0@HE1PR0601MB2203.eurprd06.prod.outlook.com> <f293e325-bea2-5c27-c677-563f05c60da0@cs.tcd.ie> <bf8531981ecd4a0db3607f9ef5328d38@VI1PR9003MB0237.MGDPHG.emi.philips.com> <8bbc028d-0960-3f93-ccc2-e8746fd98ca6@gmail.com> <579d47e5f90a43e194135e8c46c82159@VI1PR9003MB0237.MGDPHG.emi.philips.com> <CAHbuEH4Z071rdTf=x0bUKd3tkt_r-0k5-vXsYYeoHQrgH1AnTg@mail.gmail.com>
From: Eliot Lear <lear@cisco.com>
Message-ID: <1108130d-2cc4-142b-8758-d929bc31135b@cisco.com>
Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2016 17:59:27 +0200
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.11; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.2.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <CAHbuEH4Z071rdTf=x0bUKd3tkt_r-0k5-vXsYYeoHQrgH1AnTg@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg="pgp-sha256"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="11TkFONIH30IqgQe9Jvw8LdxoIkjwGsOf"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ace/B2BzYSrWFzqrZ6LulcWqqaUz9Po>
Cc: Stephen Farrell <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie>, "ace@ietf.org" <ace@ietf.org>, Rene Struik <rstruik.ext@gmail.com>, Michael StJohns <mstjohns@comcast.net>, Somaraju Abhinav <abhinav.somaraju@tridonic.com>
Subject: Re: [Ace] Adoption of Low Latency Group Communication Security Work in ACE
X-BeenThere: ace@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Authentication and Authorization for Constrained Environments \(ace\)" <ace.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ace>, <mailto:ace-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ace/>
List-Post: <mailto:ace@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ace-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ace>, <mailto:ace-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2016 16:10:28 -0000

Hi Kathleen,


On 7/26/16 4:52 PM, Kathleen Moriarty wrote:
> What is the bigger threat model?  
>
> Lights turning on/off in large buildings could result in increased
> energy costs.
> Lights turning on/off could result in safety issues (they could be
> extreme).

It's also a matter of changing colors, misappropriation of sensors, and
perhaps more important: expropriation of the lighting systems to attack
other systems.  Thus the concern over transitory trust, especially
should these systems have multiple functions.

Eliot