Re: [Ace] Adoption of Low Latency Group Communication Security Work in ACE
Somaraju Abhinav <abhinav.somaraju@tridonic.com> Mon, 25 July 2016 11:57 UTC
Return-Path: <abhinav.somaraju@tridonic.com>
X-Original-To: ace@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ace@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7FE0E12D7ED for <ace@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 25 Jul 2016 04:57:29 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.922
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.922 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=zgrp.onmicrosoft.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id R1tCJRG1DiEG for <ace@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 25 Jul 2016 04:57:27 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from EUR02-HE1-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (mail-eopbgr10119.outbound.protection.outlook.com [40.107.1.119]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9798012D7EC for <Ace@ietf.org>; Mon, 25 Jul 2016 04:57:26 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=zgrp.onmicrosoft.com; s=selector1-tridonic-com; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version; bh=M6FriiYbj8bja1uhaWnJzVS/JFl/jxLmU1n4b7Id3ws=; b=aWYYpNaZk24BgCYyf5P+aoLRwBgvvlAS7tygovoIeSv9XpUBH8EyKfOMeARVgFwRaYREsTQr3GgsPy+huk1nCDbqB+XYenK1WMZ8uyejZpU3NO4F3A40T5kLODaqxICPhmu5p6XU4nXg9fCWHsXWkhspxX/gvcYWkFjdpYtebc4=
Received: from HE1PR0601MB2203.eurprd06.prod.outlook.com (10.168.35.138) by HE1PR0601MB2202.eurprd06.prod.outlook.com (10.168.35.137) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_CBC_SHA384_P384) id 15.1.544.10; Mon, 25 Jul 2016 11:57:19 +0000
Received: from HE1PR0601MB2203.eurprd06.prod.outlook.com ([10.168.35.138]) by HE1PR0601MB2203.eurprd06.prod.outlook.com ([10.168.35.138]) with mapi id 15.01.0544.019; Mon, 25 Jul 2016 11:57:20 +0000
From: Somaraju Abhinav <abhinav.somaraju@tridonic.com>
To: Hannes Tschofenig <hannes.tschofenig@gmx.net>, "Ace@ietf.org" <Ace@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [Ace] Adoption of Low Latency Group Communication Security Work in ACE
Thread-Index: AQHR4m6Ew0lvzo1As0CGbThQDWEth6ApEd9g
Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2016 11:57:19 +0000
Message-ID: <HE1PR0601MB220381DB4BCA1F831069A6FFFC0D0@HE1PR0601MB2203.eurprd06.prod.outlook.com>
References: <578F4D59.8050005@gmx.net>
In-Reply-To: <578F4D59.8050005@gmx.net>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach: yes
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
authentication-results: spf=none (sender IP is ) smtp.mailfrom=abhinav.somaraju@tridonic.com;
x-originating-ip: [146.108.200.10]
x-ms-office365-filtering-correlation-id: fdeeeaf5-dd1d-4c4b-21bf-08d3b482d4ed
x-microsoft-exchange-diagnostics: 1; HE1PR0601MB2202; 6:lp4LYa+oM04nRKbnUbHXcvKbJyJdjV98It1aAhj0ftI4dVgWpRDLVFtpkbW+IZhfenfl5PGGECv6cKpT3no/Sjhclo7CedSEre5NYEuh3uiA7hk6EDdVABBESqhLJvIKxoXXW0j4Qr3US/3oaqDJgB6uaF7oLFnN/fN+7ats0BknCTFegwdVTjfwB8gGwhesuZ/a5b42/1Oc/BbyriuDf9kSeMJI9nwUI+OepSU4rc9zr8Ied0SLncZYdNKcjtr1voFocyGHogojEsISLCwP8Ebje1KiLUH2z3Q61baTPsHwZnlbC9nF8+TdG4r7ZP13e/hXYMpFGIKHitJro5Bq6w==; 5:Gul9u+yoIX/cFCT2KCwmBxqs/TQuZbQFIfjOqs/1sZg+oVN2FA4KzvYVSPuvN3T3pqd3deT/reWHpyUf1VauS/mSdvgX9exchZFgES07l0q7qNDt7/yTVQy+nsrPyD4gildQztVH3gqETs4QKbLJkA==; 24:RjnBNyG0V8N5jsqWRwBgKQdrwB7SKfg5m9il0sMBQ+6YJAUsH/0iBJFG2+RvuKY5/7Be0fHxlyR3w9VAIsKOB+k4yehsl+ahgr9lco1+6m4=; 7:8qffFJpakXmTWo4bPTciJ4xrlJuttFQ7OD8oMeLCqko+Ka1MTMuS9X+g/1nrQ3ebsJs7cs2vgkugWpChui2JW9g2tbJTB3ewkU763jLi9duErCB2cO6YjsvHuArWDBxjHzDFfY7DzQx1NcBCfS6q8kL4z5P/fNgvmx74lSpcCArTJoOgeAG+acTAGXDfspDXd8MwQ1ZHw1+Mz3Bgb2LI6YwSsVPg15FJyJj4xKPjeRXAeZSkuQGme3oAh9yRz3PA
x-microsoft-antispam: UriScan:;BCL:0;PCL:0;RULEID:;SRVR:HE1PR0601MB2202;
x-microsoft-antispam-prvs: <HE1PR0601MB22029B547F9D0082881DD9D8FC0D0@HE1PR0601MB2202.eurprd06.prod.outlook.com>
x-exchange-antispam-report-test: UriScan:(192374486261705);
x-exchange-antispam-report-cfa-test: BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:(102415321)(601004)(2401047)(8121501046)(5005006)(3002001)(10201501046)(6055026); SRVR:HE1PR0601MB2202; BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:; SRVR:HE1PR0601MB2202;
x-forefront-prvs: 0014E2CF50
x-forefront-antispam-report: SFV:NSPM; SFS:(10019020)(6009001)(7916002)(189002)(53754006)(199003)(13464003)(3660700001)(3280700002)(122556002)(81166006)(81156014)(106356001)(106116001)(97736004)(86362001)(8936002)(77096005)(6116002)(586003)(19580395003)(19580405001)(2501003)(7846002)(3846002)(102836003)(7736002)(189998001)(66066001)(107886002)(5001770100001)(15975445007)(7110500001)(5890100001)(76576001)(2950100001)(2900100001)(87936001)(92566002)(54356999)(76176999)(5002640100001)(305945005)(7696003)(101416001)(5003600100003)(15650500001)(68736007)(10710500007)(74316002)(2420400007)(33656002)(50986999)(9686002)(105586002)(10400500002)(2906002)(99936001); DIR:OUT; SFP:1102; SCL:1; SRVR:HE1PR0601MB2202; H:HE1PR0601MB2203.eurprd06.prod.outlook.com; FPR:; SPF:None; PTR:InfoNoRecords; MX:1; A:1; LANG:en;
received-spf: None (protection.outlook.com: tridonic.com does not designate permitted sender hosts)
spamdiagnosticoutput: 1:99
spamdiagnosticmetadata: NSPM
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="_002_HE1PR0601MB220381DB4BCA1F831069A6FFFC0D0HE1PR0601MB2203_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-OriginatorOrg: tridonic.com
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 25 Jul 2016 11:57:19.8799 (UTC)
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Hosted
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: 8b206608-a593-4ace-a4b6-ef1fc83c9169
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: HE1PR0601MB2202
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ace/PEBuARE2IaHhrZ8uKhmJj0TxWqY>
Subject: Re: [Ace] Adoption of Low Latency Group Communication Security Work in ACE
X-BeenThere: ace@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Authentication and Authorization for Constrained Environments \(ace\)" <ace.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ace>, <mailto:ace-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ace/>
List-Post: <mailto:ace@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ace-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ace>, <mailto:ace-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2016 11:57:29 -0000
Hi All, see attached a Use-case document that was prepared within the OpenAIS consortium (http://www.openais.eu/) for requirements on low latency multicast in lighting. Might help to understand the requirements at least from a lighting point of view. Abhinav -----Original Message----- From: Ace [mailto:ace-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Hannes Tschofenig Sent: Mittwoch, 20. Juli 2016 12:07 To: Ace@ietf.org Subject: [Ace] Adoption of Low Latency Group Communication Security Work in ACE Hi all, at the ACE meeting today I asked the participants whether they are in favor of adding low latency group communication security work in the ACE group. 20 persons were in favor of doing the work. 5 people argued against doing this work. If you haven't been at the meeting please contribute your thoughts here on the list. If you believe you do not have enough information please also speak up. Ciao Hannes ________________________________________________________ The contents of this e-mail and any attachments are confidential to the intended recipient. They may not be disclosed to or used by or copied in any way by anyone other than the intended recipient. If this e-mail is received in error, please immediately notify the sender and delete the e-mail and attached documents. Please note that neither the sender nor the sender's company accept any responsibility for viruses and it is your responsibility to scan or otherwise check this e-mail and any attachments.
- Re: [Ace] Adoption of Low Latency Group Communica… Rene Struik
- Re: [Ace] Adoption of Low Latency Group Communica… Kumar, Sandeep
- Re: [Ace] Adoption of Low Latency Group Communica… Michael StJohns
- Re: [Ace] Adoption of Low Latency Group Communica… Kumar, Sandeep
- Re: [Ace] Adoption of Low Latency Group Communica… Stephen Farrell
- Re: [Ace] Adoption of Low Latency Group Communica… Eliot Lear
- Re: [Ace] Adoption of Low Latency Group Communica… Michael StJohns
- Re: [Ace] Adoption of Low Latency Group Communica… Somaraju Abhinav
- Re: [Ace] Adoption of Low Latency Group Communica… Somaraju Abhinav
- Re: [Ace] Adoption of Low Latency Group Communica… Michael StJohns
- Re: [Ace] Adoption of Low Latency Group Communica… Somaraju Abhinav
- Re: [Ace] Adoption of Low Latency Group Communica… Somaraju Abhinav
- Re: [Ace] Adoption of Low Latency Group Communica… Derek Atkins
- Re: [Ace] Adoption of Low Latency Group Communica… Jim Schaad
- Re: [Ace] Adoption of Low Latency Group Communica… Ludwig Seitz
- Re: [Ace] Adoption of Low Latency Group Communica… Michael StJohns
- Re: [Ace] Adoption of Low Latency Group Communica… Eliot Lear
- Re: [Ace] Adoption of Low Latency Group Communica… Michael StJohns
- Re: [Ace] Adoption of Low Latency Group Communica… Michael Richardson
- Re: [Ace] Adoption of Low Latency Group Communica… Michael Richardson
- Re: [Ace] Adoption of Low Latency Group Communica… Hannes Tschofenig
- Re: [Ace] Adoption of Low Latency Group Communica… Thomas Hardjono
- Re: [Ace] Adoption of Low Latency Group Communica… Kumar, Sandeep
- Re: [Ace] Adoption of Low Latency Group Communica… Rahman, Akbar
- Re: [Ace] Adoption of Low Latency Group Communica… Smith, Ned
- [Ace] Adoption of Low Latency Group Communication… Hannes Tschofenig
- Re: [Ace] Adoption of Low Latency Group Communica… Michael StJohns
- Re: [Ace] Adoption of Low Latency Group Communica… Robert Cragie
- Re: [Ace] Adoption of Low Latency Group Communica… Michael StJohns
- Re: [Ace] Adoption of Low Latency Group Communica… Eliot Lear
- Re: [Ace] Adoption of Low Latency Group Communica… Grunwald, Markus
- Re: [Ace] Adoption of Low Latency Group Communica… Robert Cragie
- Re: [Ace] Adoption of Low Latency Group Communica… Garcia Morchon O, Oscar
- Re: [Ace] Adoption of Low Latency Group Communica… Kathleen Moriarty
- Re: [Ace] Adoption of Low Latency Group Communica… Eliot Lear
- Re: [Ace] Adoption of Low Latency Group Communica… Somaraju Abhinav
- Re: [Ace] Adoption of Low Latency Group Communica… Michael StJohns
- Re: [Ace] Adoption of Low Latency Group Communica… Kathleen Moriarty
- Re: [Ace] Adoption of Low Latency Group Communica… Eliot Lear
- Re: [Ace] Adoption of Low Latency Group Communica… Kathleen Moriarty
- Re: [Ace] Adoption of Low Latency Group Communica… Kathleen Moriarty
- Re: [Ace] Adoption of Low Latency Group Communica… Somaraju Abhinav
- Re: [Ace] Adoption of Low Latency Group Communica… Michael StJohns
- Re: [Ace] Adoption of Low Latency Group Communica… Carsten Bormann
- Re: [Ace] Adoption of Low Latency Group Communica… Ludwig Seitz