[Ace] Adoption of Low Latency Group Communication Security Work in ACE
Hannes Tschofenig <hannes.tschofenig@gmx.net> Wed, 20 July 2016 10:07 UTC
Return-Path: <hannes.tschofenig@gmx.net>
X-Original-To: ace@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ace@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 944A512DB03 for <ace@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 20 Jul 2016 03:07:21 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.888
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.888 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-1.287, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id HScJVhXdrJwv for <ace@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 20 Jul 2016 03:07:20 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mout.gmx.net (mout.gmx.net [212.227.17.22]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 754B812D095 for <Ace@ietf.org>; Wed, 20 Jul 2016 03:07:19 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.10.131] ([31.133.155.135]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx102) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0LbPza-1awpWY1Mt8-00kwKd for <Ace@ietf.org>; Wed, 20 Jul 2016 12:07:16 +0200
To: "Ace@ietf.org" <Ace@ietf.org>
From: Hannes Tschofenig <hannes.tschofenig@gmx.net>
Openpgp: id=071A97A9ECBADCA8E31E678554D9CEEF4D776BC9
Message-ID: <578F4D59.8050005@gmx.net>
Date: Wed, 20 Jul 2016 12:07:21 +0200
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.8.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg="pgp-sha512"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="ql31sQMfP33MlT1Gq01HIxUcQiJUjXSxD"
X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:KHptF8rZhQVQw/Ee7UiPOqL73fmEjhvMFUt1nsq9+Atm/UhJ9OI cykTLEkgJehjHg4nbSigGjpla0/PZ3bOpuUIK35ozKdhpZ0eFLTz25C3fAbvZN0ZO1VQphJ p6LQw6xqVSeqB8hIXanAaji9qKfKLB3bsSw9+dKX2GrqYMM15vMTEMm1NXYuGSP9UQFwLUc NF7V3lyN2Lf3KoN5GvxBg==
X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V01:K0:DWWDh1nqrQo=:FQM4AWKqxFPkxjpsneSQ+q H6PVjY/G4uOVvFYr/ghlm/NmZWdtEOo/Y6nAj2T4b2+hXz0pWjseltpfHrXIYPuecZlHaWvk7 pFY636HXHErLgziHKqXllPZvCZQXvIXukjHKRNcXqzs0VXk+nLahbDew2F2k7A/8QgT+CObtZ SbdOJaVM4xcmUh89MWetc9X0+7y66w2v26LgyNHE8wKS6SHhgeJWGAmyEJnZq65NxtX44hFJS YFm0F3PQeDHERx57H8J0t9UWoegGysSUn6uA4apZ+cxLo0e1GCA++/cOi5v7djXrGocX5qXiV KIxNgcgw1tkX5SO57ZRyIIR33cIXk9ctyHOOcsyYXjWQREY+3b2vhJarDTgvPpysSoXBR59fS QNLyOY9/NjEGiUgXQJSiMIMrAtA8InWxUJAkwfZkfY2x8pQtOsnQysN5XXtqgcM/m8zxRnXv+ h25FWjE1FgfLYMxBpO/z8CutH7mLpRW7wvEdPdhlVfomU7BCHaOftuIKGYemIphuEAG/jA6uD VwhTUKAw32hj6XOancWuR5vQyH4g4UE17ze+Q3UYCw0iLbTlEX9GZ+JNDAtZFB3ziqJnabtuY RLAXWxj119/lL7PQIAgrxG/yupy/kVYEhRjy1C+uTsW5ZGfMitF3sEK62gJ3/65U9XFrNVFjB IfyNZUcG8h2Rc1ngQOj7pw0ErvEK2LOgyThMO2uphy3MXQUMgqLKmUhwd+u983HS3hYZb2e7k TaE2iIEZWPRjjFYFabXQiRCWiaJ4ipluE5p64m07NlZP2CdriCDAWPwFVkM=
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ace/xtX0TRPO3a5q6cVK1htwFKUV_8o>
Subject: [Ace] Adoption of Low Latency Group Communication Security Work in ACE
X-BeenThere: ace@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Authentication and Authorization for Constrained Environments \(ace\)" <ace.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ace>, <mailto:ace-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ace/>
List-Post: <mailto:ace@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ace-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ace>, <mailto:ace-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 20 Jul 2016 10:07:21 -0000
Hi all, at the ACE meeting today I asked the participants whether they are in favor of adding low latency group communication security work in the ACE group. 20 persons were in favor of doing the work. 5 people argued against doing this work. If you haven't been at the meeting please contribute your thoughts here on the list. If you believe you do not have enough information please also speak up. Ciao Hannes
- Re: [Ace] Adoption of Low Latency Group Communica… Rene Struik
- Re: [Ace] Adoption of Low Latency Group Communica… Kumar, Sandeep
- Re: [Ace] Adoption of Low Latency Group Communica… Michael StJohns
- Re: [Ace] Adoption of Low Latency Group Communica… Kumar, Sandeep
- Re: [Ace] Adoption of Low Latency Group Communica… Stephen Farrell
- Re: [Ace] Adoption of Low Latency Group Communica… Eliot Lear
- Re: [Ace] Adoption of Low Latency Group Communica… Michael StJohns
- Re: [Ace] Adoption of Low Latency Group Communica… Somaraju Abhinav
- Re: [Ace] Adoption of Low Latency Group Communica… Somaraju Abhinav
- Re: [Ace] Adoption of Low Latency Group Communica… Michael StJohns
- Re: [Ace] Adoption of Low Latency Group Communica… Somaraju Abhinav
- Re: [Ace] Adoption of Low Latency Group Communica… Somaraju Abhinav
- Re: [Ace] Adoption of Low Latency Group Communica… Derek Atkins
- Re: [Ace] Adoption of Low Latency Group Communica… Jim Schaad
- Re: [Ace] Adoption of Low Latency Group Communica… Ludwig Seitz
- Re: [Ace] Adoption of Low Latency Group Communica… Michael StJohns
- Re: [Ace] Adoption of Low Latency Group Communica… Eliot Lear
- Re: [Ace] Adoption of Low Latency Group Communica… Michael StJohns
- Re: [Ace] Adoption of Low Latency Group Communica… Michael Richardson
- Re: [Ace] Adoption of Low Latency Group Communica… Michael Richardson
- Re: [Ace] Adoption of Low Latency Group Communica… Hannes Tschofenig
- Re: [Ace] Adoption of Low Latency Group Communica… Thomas Hardjono
- Re: [Ace] Adoption of Low Latency Group Communica… Kumar, Sandeep
- Re: [Ace] Adoption of Low Latency Group Communica… Rahman, Akbar
- Re: [Ace] Adoption of Low Latency Group Communica… Smith, Ned
- [Ace] Adoption of Low Latency Group Communication… Hannes Tschofenig
- Re: [Ace] Adoption of Low Latency Group Communica… Michael StJohns
- Re: [Ace] Adoption of Low Latency Group Communica… Robert Cragie
- Re: [Ace] Adoption of Low Latency Group Communica… Michael StJohns
- Re: [Ace] Adoption of Low Latency Group Communica… Eliot Lear
- Re: [Ace] Adoption of Low Latency Group Communica… Grunwald, Markus
- Re: [Ace] Adoption of Low Latency Group Communica… Robert Cragie
- Re: [Ace] Adoption of Low Latency Group Communica… Garcia Morchon O, Oscar
- Re: [Ace] Adoption of Low Latency Group Communica… Kathleen Moriarty
- Re: [Ace] Adoption of Low Latency Group Communica… Eliot Lear
- Re: [Ace] Adoption of Low Latency Group Communica… Somaraju Abhinav
- Re: [Ace] Adoption of Low Latency Group Communica… Michael StJohns
- Re: [Ace] Adoption of Low Latency Group Communica… Kathleen Moriarty
- Re: [Ace] Adoption of Low Latency Group Communica… Eliot Lear
- Re: [Ace] Adoption of Low Latency Group Communica… Kathleen Moriarty
- Re: [Ace] Adoption of Low Latency Group Communica… Kathleen Moriarty
- Re: [Ace] Adoption of Low Latency Group Communica… Somaraju Abhinav
- Re: [Ace] Adoption of Low Latency Group Communica… Michael StJohns
- Re: [Ace] Adoption of Low Latency Group Communica… Carsten Bormann
- Re: [Ace] Adoption of Low Latency Group Communica… Ludwig Seitz