Re: [Ace] Adoption of Low Latency Group Communication Security Work in ACE

[Stephen Farrell <[e-mail]>]

On 25/07/16 17:59, Somaraju Abhinav wrote:
> we essentially have 50-100 ms for the signing+verification process
> and I do not know of a solution that does this

Just a clarifying question: why can't the signing possibly be
done asynchronously? E.g. the private key holder could sign a
value that will only be sent later - as long as it has one of
those ready to emit whenever needed one can ignore the signing
time. That can have power consumption consequences but I'd
guess that's ok for a lightswitch.

If signing can be done ahead of time, then only verification
time has to be considered.

S.