Re: [Ace] Adoption of Low Latency Group Communication Security Work in ACE

Kathleen Moriarty <kathleen.moriarty.ietf@gmail.com> Tue, 26 July 2016 16:13 UTC

Return-Path: <kathleen.moriarty.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ace@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ace@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7344912D849 for <ace@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 26 Jul 2016 09:13:13 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.7
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.7 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id l_XD9fogIaGw for <ace@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 26 Jul 2016 09:13:12 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-qt0-x22c.google.com (mail-qt0-x22c.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c0d::22c]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CAA8712DBA4 for <ace@ietf.org>; Tue, 26 Jul 2016 09:06:18 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-qt0-x22c.google.com with SMTP id u25so11000060qtb.1 for <ace@ietf.org>; Tue, 26 Jul 2016 09:06:18 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=U5YyEVZGsGeBCEe3g8vorxuEUoRRb51vuUtR8vbm9ng=; b=O69dyawdDO4AVs7oyrfIYthV22eKCK7LX02Yw5TIqlIqPTbfA74WkguV53/ODsmQqz OnLiziO3zzs2P/q27U3wVCLafWMTTgf2EiJWvr5F27wmwyoU3qsDziC4/9tHXt2r198t fKe7LPe8OGwZBNQdXfgETsXkC+wHCRi2WuvC7PEwqp4feyj2+bz5uzlNeoRsnehKQvBo KQkmbl9TC0aJu2lq8h6tH00VGTzey31/FNp24fX9YmY7ZZXwEJPiVe45hu80fQpUREWZ 5F5792gl6x2lLJy2/0pYhOBRlb8C2aSqtmeLzf+rFWAiLyO6DlnXUEC4w2ieu5z+VbXJ A+7Q==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=U5YyEVZGsGeBCEe3g8vorxuEUoRRb51vuUtR8vbm9ng=; b=eZKWbVUO+hPfq7oTx5Z0/Lm08cmKQcM2595cX/QIOsqJVB6AlptvLOG7lMMgSUC85U kXCdg/IVWbwKXSn5GtFhpaSonVM2oOw5oH3d1rU1RmKNQzAhIp0M5xS92iP1XQme56l0 pcgVVFvgZ8HVqBMXIu16Dyx39tCQEh4QK/VnuZNr6uYg+PUvrPNvHoGixqs9uSeUTRGA LVXhg1cY4PISVc4PDQEct4Dk5mJYrbLXoxboWd5nHXQEyYiT03ZKgoHzK+dNQr3WBuQU B5A4nScb8FOcrjam03B990VwQ6IuKv/mcGloEOKUYVW1tcbsExXcUW1DEHA4fWyLlwOi GtHw==
X-Gm-Message-State: AEkoous4ki3760W2pu9lHg+cx2hPZCE5IohzoeV08ltu5XOAqtzWOJttEDBm6gqfGWi93ieaML2hQ5QxOhA5jQ==
X-Received: by 10.176.0.56 with SMTP id 53mr10695697uai.113.1469549177728; Tue, 26 Jul 2016 09:06:17 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.159.37.104 with HTTP; Tue, 26 Jul 2016 09:06:16 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <1108130d-2cc4-142b-8758-d929bc31135b@cisco.com>
References: <578F4D59.8050005@gmx.net> <5E393DF26B791A428E5F003BB6C5342AB3716D64@OC11EXPO33.exchange.mit.edu> <23666.1469091857@obiwan.sandelman.ca> <95b0103c-ba2d-6cd8-6241-228df46e530b@sics.se> <8ca27108-a8b9-7b07-e752-656247716708@comcast.net> <HE1PR0601MB22030003D2913DA6096CB3E4FC0D0@HE1PR0601MB2203.eurprd06.prod.outlook.com> <a318cda7-ebf2-5a5c-d86a-9d67fb41a82f@comcast.net> <HE1PR0601MB2203D1C2C96278B23D71AD31FC0D0@HE1PR0601MB2203.eurprd06.prod.outlook.com> <f293e325-bea2-5c27-c677-563f05c60da0@cs.tcd.ie> <bf8531981ecd4a0db3607f9ef5328d38@VI1PR9003MB0237.MGDPHG.emi.philips.com> <8bbc028d-0960-3f93-ccc2-e8746fd98ca6@gmail.com> <579d47e5f90a43e194135e8c46c82159@VI1PR9003MB0237.MGDPHG.emi.philips.com> <CAHbuEH4Z071rdTf=x0bUKd3tkt_r-0k5-vXsYYeoHQrgH1AnTg@mail.gmail.com> <1108130d-2cc4-142b-8758-d929bc31135b@cisco.com>
From: Kathleen Moriarty <kathleen.moriarty.ietf@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2016 12:06:16 -0400
Message-ID: <CAHbuEH4OkV1YfMJacd8Md2KezPpCAnyd7C=h7udsOCtU8znbAw@mail.gmail.com>
To: Eliot Lear <lear@cisco.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ace/VBRY6pyDzX3e_l18y_96UmlPBGg>
Cc: Rene Struik <rstruik.ext@gmail.com>, Michael StJohns <mstjohns@comcast.net>, "ace@ietf.org" <ace@ietf.org>, Somaraju Abhinav <abhinav.somaraju@tridonic.com>, "Kumar, Sandeep" <sandeep.kumar@philips.com>, Stephen Farrell <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie>
Subject: Re: [Ace] Adoption of Low Latency Group Communication Security Work in ACE
X-BeenThere: ace@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Authentication and Authorization for Constrained Environments \(ace\)" <ace.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ace>, <mailto:ace-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ace/>
List-Post: <mailto:ace@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ace-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ace>, <mailto:ace-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2016 16:13:13 -0000

On Tue, Jul 26, 2016 at 11:59 AM, Eliot Lear <lear@cisco.com> wrote:
> Hi Kathleen,
>
>
> On 7/26/16 4:52 PM, Kathleen Moriarty wrote:
>
> What is the bigger threat model?
>
> Lights turning on/off in large buildings could result in increased energy
> costs.
> Lights turning on/off could result in safety issues (they could be extreme).
>
>
> It's also a matter of changing colors, misappropriation of sensors, and
> perhaps more important: expropriation of the lighting systems to attack
> other systems.

Sure, but only if it's connected to other devices in a way that
permits this.  I haven't seen what the intended architecture is for
the proposed solution.

>  Thus the concern over transitory trust, especially should
> these systems have multiple functions.
>
> Eliot
>



-- 

Best regards,
Kathleen