Re: [Ace] EST over CoAP in ACE wg

Eliot Lear <> Mon, 21 November 2016 15:21 UTC

Return-Path: <>
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7A0F5129AC9 for <>; Mon, 21 Nov 2016 07:21:04 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -16.018
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-16.018 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-1.497, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key)
Received: from ([]) by localhost ( []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Ap0tc4atLD4R for <>; Mon, 21 Nov 2016 07:21:02 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ( []) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CFA151296B9 for <>; Mon, 21 Nov 2016 07:21:01 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple;;; l=6587; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1479741662; x=1480951262; h=subject:to:references:cc:from:message-id:date: mime-version:in-reply-to; bh=873pRJ6RYteeoFT+w0duRbXjV7O/3RL01rsF20+QpYg=; b=EhMcN2YB3Cb6tFXAThsdtcrM0ZN2B+ql2UrT3VO+rQGCMmf4z8nSEirq ymHEahwxSHGk3g6m05t+zVkDp5z4bDe7Zb5ifQSeSpvr/eqUfjl4PgFul SJdLY+XDzq3IwpH1a5C6WcXPSrpNueeC1Y9UBVEEU3vQ5XY/1X/E3yjuD w=;
X-Files: signature.asc : 481
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.31,675,1473120000"; d="asc'?scan'208,217";a="647259435"
Received: from (HELO ([]) by with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 21 Nov 2016 15:21:00 +0000
Received: from [] ([]) by (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id uALFKxtx010401; Mon, 21 Nov 2016 15:20:59 GMT
To: "Kumar, Sandeep" <>, "" <>
References: <>
From: Eliot Lear <>
Message-ID: <>
Date: Mon, 21 Nov 2016 16:20:59 +0100
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.12; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.4.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg="pgp-sha256"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="Htjnsm9cMueDcCpHwuN9wQbgGbiubWvgC"
Archived-At: <>
Cc: Shahid Raza <>, "Panos Kampanakis (pkampana)" <>, "''" <>
Subject: Re: [Ace] EST over CoAP in ACE wg
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Authentication and Authorization for Constrained Environments \(ace\)" <>
List-Unsubscribe: <>, <>
List-Archive: <>
List-Post: <>
List-Help: <>
List-Subscribe: <>, <>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 21 Nov 2016 15:21:04 -0000

I think this is a good idea.


On 11/21/16 3:00 PM, Kumar, Sandeep wrote:
> Dear ACE members
> Peter van Stok gave a short overview during the ACE f2f meeting on the work related to EST (RFC 7030) over DTLS secured CoAP (draft-vanderstok-core-coap-est-00<>). In the meeting there was general interest among the audience for the work and ACE as the preferred WG for this item. There are additional drafts and work on the same topic like the draft-pritikin-coap-bootstrap-01<> and the email from Shahid
> The idea is to merge these into a single draft (already discussed among us).
> We would like to get feedback on the mailing list if indeed ACE would be a right place to continue this work as was perceived during the f2f meeting. Please respond if you support (or not) the activity going forward in ACE wg.
> Kind Regards
> Sandeep
> ________________________________
> The information contained in this message may be confidential and legally protected under applicable law. The message is intended solely for the addressee(s). If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any use, forwarding, dissemination, or reproduction of this message is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by return e-mail and destroy all copies of the original message.
> _______________________________________________
> Ace mailing list