Re: [Anima-bootstrap] CoAP mandatory?
peter van der Stok <stokcons@xs4all.nl> Wed, 01 March 2017 09:07 UTC
Return-Path: <stokcons@xs4all.nl>
X-Original-To: anima-bootstrap@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: anima-bootstrap@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F41D512967E
for <anima-bootstrap@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 1 Mar 2017 01:07:59 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.62
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.62 tagged_above=-999 required=5
tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01,
RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001]
autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44])
by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
with ESMTP id 9kqUK6Ebh8n1 for <anima-bootstrap@ietfa.amsl.com>;
Wed, 1 Mar 2017 01:07:57 -0800 (PST)
Received: from lb2-smtp-cloud2.xs4all.net (lb2-smtp-cloud2.xs4all.net
[194.109.24.25])
(using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A6FFD1296E7
for <anima-bootstrap@ietf.org>; Wed, 1 Mar 2017 01:07:40 -0800 (PST)
Received: from webmail.xs4all.nl ([194.109.20.195])
by smtp-cloud2.xs4all.net with ESMTP
id qZ7b1u00X4CYHle01Z7bAm; Wed, 01 Mar 2017 10:07:38 +0100
Received: from AMontpellier-654-1-112-77.w90-0.abo.wanadoo.fr ([90.0.87.77])
by webmail.xs4all.nl
with HTTP (HTTP/1.1 POST); Wed, 01 Mar 2017 10:07:35 +0100
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII;
format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Date: Wed, 01 Mar 2017 10:07:35 +0100
From: peter van der Stok <stokcons@xs4all.nl>
To: Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
Organization: vanderstok consultancy
Mail-Reply-To: consultancy@vanderstok.org
In-Reply-To: <27173.1488308037@obiwan.sandelman.ca>
References: <6525c5f0b6e040b683ccd9c43b1c5e2f@VI1PR9003MB0237.MGDPHG.emi.philips.com>
<14831.1481139454@obiwan.sandelman.ca>
<d9aba3a07d14400f88f22329abc00128@XCH-ALN-010.cisco.com>
<CAH51uSdK_BHgFKXzpp2XJ4H9fEqkkLynFLjV5PTn6Y8EHSFz-g@mail.gmail.com>
<8AE0F17B87264D4CAC7DE0AA6C406F45C2E940C1@nkgeml514-mbx.china.huawei.com>
<0c7b995c954746b8a58ae8a3399588ba@XCH-ALN-010.cisco.com>
<8AE0F17B87264D4CAC7DE0AA6C406F45C2E96D65@nkgeml514-mbx.china.huawei.com>
<27173.1488308037@obiwan.sandelman.ca>
Message-ID: <af26717dffd356af0815f81d65611c1f@xs4all.nl>
X-Sender: stokcons@xs4all.nl
User-Agent: XS4ALL Webmail
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/anima-bootstrap/HhMUG_FnQ2sqKppDUrOSoU1QbE8>
Cc: anima-bootstrap@ietf.org,
"Panos Kampanakis \(pkampana\)" <pkampana@cisco.com>,
"Liubing \(Leo\)" <leo.liubing@huawei.com>, "Kumar,
Sandeep" <sandeep.kumar@philips.com>
Subject: Re: [Anima-bootstrap] CoAP mandatory?
X-BeenThere: anima-bootstrap@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
Reply-To: consultancy@vanderstok.org
List-Id: Mailing list for the bootstrap design team of the ANIMA WG
<anima-bootstrap.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/anima-bootstrap>,
<mailto:anima-bootstrap-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/anima-bootstrap/>
List-Post: <mailto:anima-bootstrap@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:anima-bootstrap-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/anima-bootstrap>,
<mailto:anima-bootstrap-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 01 Mar 2017 09:08:00 -0000
From my point of view it will be more than nice, because bootstrap of IoT devices needing MASAs will be supported by the standards and the boxes using the standard. I am already happy that at this stage CoAP is considered being part of the anima bootstrapping architecture. Peter Michael Richardson schreef op 2017-02-28 19:53: > Liubing (Leo) <leo.liubing@huawei.com> wrote: > > So I guess once the new draft is adopted, BRSKI will choose the > CoAP > > as mandatory, right? > > To followup an old email thread. > > It would be nice (from my point of view), to do that, but I don't think > that > we have consensus to do that. > > > -- > Michael Richardson <mcr+IETF@sandelman.ca>ca>, Sandelman Software Works > -= IPv6 IoT consulting =- > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Anima-bootstrap mailing list > Anima-bootstrap@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/anima-bootstrap
- [Ace] EST over CoAP in ACE wg Kumar, Sandeep
- Re: [Ace] EST over CoAP in ACE wg Somaraju Abhinav
- Re: [Ace] EST over CoAP in ACE wg Eliot Lear
- Re: [Ace] EST over CoAP in ACE wg Panos Kampanakis (pkampana)
- Re: [Ace] EST over CoAP in ACE wg Samuel Erdtman
- Re: [Ace] EST over CoAP in ACE wg Shahid Raza
- Re: [Ace] EST over CoAP in ACE wg Brian Weis (bew)
- Re: [Ace] EST over CoAP in ACE wg Martin Furuhed Nexus
- Re: [6tisch-security] [Ace] EST over CoAP in ACE … Michael Richardson
- Re: [Anima-bootstrap] [Ace] EST over CoAP in ACE … Michael Richardson
- Re: [6tisch] [Ace] EST over CoAP in ACE wg Michael Richardson
- Re: [Ace] EST over CoAP in ACE wg Michael Richardson
- Re: [Ace] EST over CoAP in ACE wg Michael Richardson
- Re: [Anima-bootstrap] [Ace] EST over CoAP in ACE … peter van der Stok
- Re: [6tisch] [Ace] EST over CoAP in ACE wg peter van der Stok
- Re: [6tisch-security] [Ace] EST over CoAP in ACE … peter van der Stok
- Re: [Ace] EST over CoAP in ACE wg peter van der Stok
- Re: [Ace] [Anima-bootstrap] EST over CoAP in ACE … Panos Kampanakis (pkampana)
- Re: [Anima-bootstrap] [Ace] EST over CoAP in ACE … Panos Kampanakis (pkampana)
- Re: [6tisch-security] [Anima-bootstrap] [Ace] EST… Panos Kampanakis (pkampana)
- Re: [6tisch] [Anima-bootstrap] [Ace] EST over CoA… Panos Kampanakis (pkampana)
- Re: [6tisch-security] [Ace] [Anima-bootstrap] EST… Sandeep Kumar
- Re: [6tisch] [Ace] [Anima-bootstrap] EST over CoA… Sandeep Kumar
- Re: [Anima-bootstrap] [Ace] EST over CoAP in ACE … Sandeep Kumar
- Re: [Ace] [Anima-bootstrap] EST over CoAP in ACE … Sandeep Kumar
- [Anima-bootstrap] CoAP mandatory? Liubing (Leo)
- Re: [Anima-bootstrap] CoAP mandatory? Panos Kampanakis (pkampana)
- Re: [Anima-bootstrap] CoAP mandatory? Liubing (Leo)
- Re: [Anima-bootstrap] CoAP mandatory? Michael Richardson
- Re: [Anima-bootstrap] CoAP mandatory? Liubing (Leo)
- Re: [Anima-bootstrap] CoAP mandatory? Carsten Bormann
- Re: [Anima-bootstrap] CoAP mandatory? Liubing (Leo)
- Re: [Anima-bootstrap] CoAP mandatory? peter van der Stok
- Re: [Anima-bootstrap] CoAP mandatory? Michael Richardson
- Re: [Anima-bootstrap] CoAP mandatory? Michael Richardson
- Re: [Ace] [Anima-bootstrap] EST over CoAP in ACE … Michael Richardson
- Re: [Anima-bootstrap] [Ace] EST over CoAP in ACE … Michael Richardson
- Re: [6tisch-security] [Anima-bootstrap] [Ace] EST… Michael Richardson
- Re: [6tisch] [Anima-bootstrap] [Ace] EST over CoA… Michael Richardson