Re: [Anima-bootstrap] CoAP mandatory?

peter van der Stok <stokcons@xs4all.nl> Wed, 01 March 2017 09:07 UTC

Return-Path: <stokcons@xs4all.nl>
X-Original-To: anima-bootstrap@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: anima-bootstrap@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F41D512967E for <anima-bootstrap@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 1 Mar 2017 01:07:59 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.62
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.62 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 9kqUK6Ebh8n1 for <anima-bootstrap@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 1 Mar 2017 01:07:57 -0800 (PST)
Received: from lb2-smtp-cloud2.xs4all.net (lb2-smtp-cloud2.xs4all.net [194.109.24.25]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A6FFD1296E7 for <anima-bootstrap@ietf.org>; Wed, 1 Mar 2017 01:07:40 -0800 (PST)
Received: from webmail.xs4all.nl ([194.109.20.195]) by smtp-cloud2.xs4all.net with ESMTP id qZ7b1u00X4CYHle01Z7bAm; Wed, 01 Mar 2017 10:07:38 +0100
Received: from AMontpellier-654-1-112-77.w90-0.abo.wanadoo.fr ([90.0.87.77]) by webmail.xs4all.nl with HTTP (HTTP/1.1 POST); Wed, 01 Mar 2017 10:07:35 +0100
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Date: Wed, 01 Mar 2017 10:07:35 +0100
From: peter van der Stok <stokcons@xs4all.nl>
To: Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
Organization: vanderstok consultancy
Mail-Reply-To: consultancy@vanderstok.org
In-Reply-To: <27173.1488308037@obiwan.sandelman.ca>
References: <6525c5f0b6e040b683ccd9c43b1c5e2f@VI1PR9003MB0237.MGDPHG.emi.philips.com> <14831.1481139454@obiwan.sandelman.ca> <d9aba3a07d14400f88f22329abc00128@XCH-ALN-010.cisco.com> <CAH51uSdK_BHgFKXzpp2XJ4H9fEqkkLynFLjV5PTn6Y8EHSFz-g@mail.gmail.com> <8AE0F17B87264D4CAC7DE0AA6C406F45C2E940C1@nkgeml514-mbx.china.huawei.com> <0c7b995c954746b8a58ae8a3399588ba@XCH-ALN-010.cisco.com> <8AE0F17B87264D4CAC7DE0AA6C406F45C2E96D65@nkgeml514-mbx.china.huawei.com> <27173.1488308037@obiwan.sandelman.ca>
Message-ID: <af26717dffd356af0815f81d65611c1f@xs4all.nl>
X-Sender: stokcons@xs4all.nl
User-Agent: XS4ALL Webmail
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/anima-bootstrap/HhMUG_FnQ2sqKppDUrOSoU1QbE8>
Cc: anima-bootstrap@ietf.org, "Panos Kampanakis \(pkampana\)" <pkampana@cisco.com>, "Liubing \(Leo\)" <leo.liubing@huawei.com>, "Kumar, Sandeep" <sandeep.kumar@philips.com>
Subject: Re: [Anima-bootstrap] CoAP mandatory?
X-BeenThere: anima-bootstrap@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
Reply-To: consultancy@vanderstok.org
List-Id: Mailing list for the bootstrap design team of the ANIMA WG <anima-bootstrap.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/anima-bootstrap>, <mailto:anima-bootstrap-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/anima-bootstrap/>
List-Post: <mailto:anima-bootstrap@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:anima-bootstrap-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/anima-bootstrap>, <mailto:anima-bootstrap-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 01 Mar 2017 09:08:00 -0000

 From my point of view it will be more than nice, because bootstrap of 
IoT devices needing MASAs will be supported by the standards and the 
boxes using the standard.

I am already happy that at this stage CoAP is considered being part of 
the anima bootstrapping architecture.

Peter

Michael Richardson schreef op 2017-02-28 19:53:
> Liubing (Leo) <leo.liubing@huawei.com> wrote:
>     > So I guess once the new draft is adopted, BRSKI will choose the 
> CoAP
>     > as mandatory, right?
> 
> To followup an old email thread.
> 
> It would be nice (from my point of view), to do that, but I don't think 
> that
> we have consensus to do that.
> 
> 
> --
> Michael Richardson <mcr+IETF@sandelman.ca>ca>, Sandelman Software Works
>  -= IPv6 IoT consulting =-
> 
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Anima-bootstrap mailing list
> Anima-bootstrap@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/anima-bootstrap