Re: [apps-discuss] I-D Action: draft-ietf-appsawg-rfc3462bis-00.txt

Keith Moore <moore@network-heretics.com> Wed, 14 September 2011 16:35 UTC

Return-Path: <moore@network-heretics.com>
X-Original-To: apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EA0A721F8B53 for <apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 14 Sep 2011 09:35:39 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.477
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.477 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.122, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Y4QmF2IWzQz2 for <apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 14 Sep 2011 09:35:39 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from out3.smtp.messagingengine.com (out3.smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.27]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 31EB621F8A35 for <apps-discuss@ietf.org>; Wed, 14 Sep 2011 09:35:39 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from compute3.internal (compute3.nyi.mail.srv.osa [10.202.2.43]) by gateway1.nyi.mail.srv.osa (Postfix) with ESMTP id D38562B09E; Wed, 14 Sep 2011 12:37:47 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from frontend1.nyi.mail.srv.osa ([10.202.2.160]) by compute3.internal (MEProxy); Wed, 14 Sep 2011 12:37:47 -0400
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=subject:mime-version:content-type:from :in-reply-to:date:cc:content-transfer-encoding:message-id :references:to; s=smtpout; bh=fK0N/DH/9HEPCgYK0RSGT6RB9Kk=; b=Zu w0MDy1Qm3xGQQPUXCIjC49DfR1M6F4U4CS1+3V9pgmrNAv14kSoTQ9uiZAwbmkqa ikn0RgNyUT2Psre58812BfN1Vlib20fbAq8DXR0fpciKyMCF+9rm973wjXE3mEuH a4GHzqu2IoGv69Grxb53XRUGdR/3xrgODKqCpaNeA=
X-Sasl-enc: oNmmr6jg5KLO1gvqL7WGBQfDCMip5dblo7KXNvvA4okC 1316018267
Received: from host65-16-145-177.birch.net (host65-16-145-177.birch.net [65.16.145.177]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 04F775E040E; Wed, 14 Sep 2011 12:37:46 -0400 (EDT)
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1084)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
From: Keith Moore <moore@network-heretics.com>
In-Reply-To: <F5833273385BB34F99288B3648C4F06F13512DF99D@EXCH-C2.corp.cloudmark.com>
Date: Wed, 14 Sep 2011 12:37:45 -0400
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <C0FA01F1-E62B-41E1-9093-73E536AB666D@network-heretics.com>
References: <20110830041853.24036.37.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <F5833273385BB34F99288B3648C4F06F13512DF99D@EXCH-C2.corp.cloudmark.com>
To: "Murray S. Kucherawy" <msk@cloudmark.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1084)
Cc: "apps-discuss@ietf.org" <apps-discuss@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [apps-discuss] I-D Action: draft-ietf-appsawg-rfc3462bis-00.txt
X-BeenThere: apps-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: General discussion of application-layer protocols <apps-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/apps-discuss>
List-Post: <mailto:apps-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 14 Sep 2011 16:35:40 -0000

On Aug 30, 2011, at 2:25 PM, Murray S. Kucherawy wrote:

>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: apps-discuss-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:apps-discuss-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of internet-drafts@ietf.org
>> Sent: Monday, August 29, 2011 9:19 PM
>> To: i-d-announce@ietf.org
>> Cc: apps-discuss@ietf.org
>> Subject: [apps-discuss] I-D Action: draft-ietf-appsawg-rfc3462bis-
>> 00.txt
>> 
>> A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts
>> directories. This draft is a work item of the Applications Area Working
>> Group Working Group of the IETF.
>> 
>> 	Title           : The Multipart/Report Media Type for the Reporting of Mail System Administrative Messages
>> 	Author(s)       : Murray S. Kucherawy
>> 	Filename        : draft-ietf-appsawg-rfc3462bis-00.txt
>> 	Pages           : 13
>> 	Date            : 2011-08-29
> 
> This is a straight conversion from the individual submission, which contained what I think was the consensus from the Quebec City meeting plus some list discussion afterwards.  Review please (especially Ned and Keith!).

I'm not happy with the current draft.  I would prefer that it say something about use of multipart/report when generating DSNs and MDNs.

I am in agreement that multipart/report should potentially be able to appear anywhere.  e.g. it should be possible to forward a message containing a multipart/report, and it should be possible for that forwarded message to fail to be delivered and be included in its entirety in a DSN.

Keith