IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [apps-discuss] I-D Action: draft-ietf-appsawg-rfc3462bis-00.txt

"Murray S. Kucherawy" <msk@cloudmark.com> Wed, 14 September 2011 16:55 UTC

Return-Path: <msk@cloudmark.com>
X-Original-To: apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2762B21F8BA2 for <apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 14 Sep 2011 09:55:49 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -103.497
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-103.497 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.102, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id bIQPUWdQlJQu for <apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 14 Sep 2011 09:55:48 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ht1-outbound.cloudmark.com (ht1-outbound.cloudmark.com [72.5.239.35]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C67DE21F8B8F for <apps-discuss@ietf.org>; Wed, 14 Sep 2011 09:55:48 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from EXCH-C2.corp.cloudmark.com ([172.22.1.74]) by malice.corp.cloudmark.com ([172.22.10.71]) with mapi; Wed, 14 Sep 2011 09:57:58 -0700
From: "Murray S. Kucherawy" <msk@cloudmark.com>
To: Keith Moore <moore@network-heretics.com>
Date: Wed, 14 Sep 2011 09:57:56 -0700
Thread-Topic: [apps-discuss] I-D Action: draft-ietf-appsawg-rfc3462bis-00.txt
Thread-Index: Acxy/KdCepw5IgmJRwCPWY7w6abjGgAAqlIQ
Message-ID: <F5833273385BB34F99288B3648C4F06F13512DFC44@EXCH-C2.corp.cloudmark.com>
References: <20110830041853.24036.37.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <F5833273385BB34F99288B3648C4F06F13512DF99D@EXCH-C2.corp.cloudmark.com> <C0FA01F1-E62B-41E1-9093-73E536AB666D@network-heretics.com>
In-Reply-To: <C0FA01F1-E62B-41E1-9093-73E536AB666D@network-heretics.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
acceptlanguage: en-US
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Cc: "apps-discuss@ietf.org" <apps-discuss@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [apps-discuss] I-D Action: draft-ietf-appsawg-rfc3462bis-00.txt
X-BeenThere: apps-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: General discussion of application-layer protocols <apps-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/apps-discuss>
List-Post: <mailto:apps-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 14 Sep 2011 16:55:49 -0000

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Keith Moore [mailto:moore@network-heretics.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, September 14, 2011 9:38 AM
> To: Murray S. Kucherawy
> Cc: apps-discuss@ietf.org
> Subject: Re: [apps-discuss] I-D Action: draft-ietf-appsawg-rfc3462bis-00.txt
> 
> I'm not happy with the current draft.  I would prefer that it say
> something about use of multipart/report when generating DSNs and MDNs.

I think the discussion I've heard so far is satisfied with the fact that the DSN and MDN drafts repeat the "top-most" requirement, so there's no need to assert it here as well (making it a requirement for those and all future uses of multipart/report, which is exactly what MARF does not want).

v2.27.8 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status