IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [apps-discuss] Comments on Malformed Message BCP draft

Arnt Gulbrandsen <arnt@gulbrandsen.priv.no> Fri, 15 April 2011 21:25 UTC

Return-Path: <arnt@gulbrandsen.priv.no>
X-Original-To: apps-discuss@ietfc.amsl.com
Delivered-To: apps-discuss@ietfc.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfc.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EA789E06B8 for <apps-discuss@ietfc.amsl.com>; Fri, 15 Apr 2011 14:25:54 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.49
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.49 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=1.110, BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([208.66.40.236]) by localhost (ietfc.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id F6wx9QZ8ot+6 for <apps-discuss@ietfc.amsl.com>; Fri, 15 Apr 2011 14:25:54 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from strange.aox.org (strange.aox.org [IPv6:2001:4d88:100c::1]) by ietfc.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 40EC0E0673 for <apps-discuss@ietf.org>; Fri, 15 Apr 2011 14:25:54 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from fri.gulbrandsen.priv.no (kalyani.aox.org [79.140.39.164]) by strange.aox.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 79378F8C008; Fri, 15 Apr 2011 21:25:52 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from arnt@gulbrandsen.priv.no by fri.gulbrandsen.priv.no (Archiveopteryx 3.1.3) with esmtpsa id 1302902751-1279-1278/9/450; Fri, 15 Apr 2011 23:25:51 +0200
Message-Id: <4DA8B7DD.3030909@gulbrandsen.priv.no>
Date: Fri, 15 Apr 2011 23:25:49 +0200
From: Arnt Gulbrandsen <arnt@gulbrandsen.priv.no>
Organization: Me, http://arnt.gulbrandsen.priv.no
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.9.2.14) Gecko/20110223 Thunderbird/3.1.8
Mime-Version: 1.0
To: "Murray S. Kucherawy" <msk@cloudmark.com>
References: <F5833273385BB34F99288B3648C4F06F1343319E22@EXCH-C2.corp.cloudmark.com> <CEDB17EC-80CE-49B5-91C1-FBCB0449BBA5@network-heretics.com> <4DA8542F.9040003@tana.it> <F5833273385BB34F99288B3648C4F06F1343319E51@EXCH-C2.corp.cloudmark.com>
In-Reply-To: <F5833273385BB34F99288B3648C4F06F1343319E51@EXCH-C2.corp.cloudmark.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Cc: ietf-822@imc.org, apps-discuss@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [apps-discuss] Comments on Malformed Message BCP draft
X-BeenThere: apps-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: General discussion of application-layer protocols <apps-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/apps-discuss>
List-Post: <mailto:apps-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 15 Apr 2011 21:25:55 -0000

I found the advice rather naïve. Not bad, but also not very 
sophisticated, and I fear that extending it to be comprehensive will not 
produce a readable document.

Still, I can see value in a document whose abstract says "here are some 
of the bad things you must expect to receive, and not just from 
spammers". Is that the goal of your draft?

Arnt

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email