IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [apps-discuss] Applicability Statements

Dave Crocker <dcrocker@bbiw.net> Thu, 12 May 2011 18:55 UTC

Return-Path: <dcrocker@bbiw.net>
X-Original-To: apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A14ABE0684 for <apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 12 May 2011 11:55:30 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id PXbUNSu-ow8O for <apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 12 May 2011 11:55:29 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from sbh17.songbird.com (sbh17.songbird.com [72.52.113.17]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 022FEE0718 for <apps-discuss@ietf.org>; Thu, 12 May 2011 11:55:29 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.1.5] (adsl-67-127-56-68.dsl.pltn13.pacbell.net [67.127.56.68]) (authenticated bits=0) by sbh17.songbird.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id p4CItMms017928 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5 bits=128 verify=NO); Thu, 12 May 2011 11:55:28 -0700
References: <4DCAC1CB.3050905@qualcomm.com> <4DCC03FD.3070608@dcrocker.net> <BANLkTikU79k4iR+rSYXKsXKzhW1w-EKKbg@mail.gmail.com> <4DCC20AF.7060206@qualcomm.com> <afc07fa3-8a24-4730-8bd9-dc56447e160d@email.android.com> <BANLkTin9VMKifEsc5ApuQPkPYLkMnKZ1nQ@mail.gmail.com>
User-Agent: K-9 Mail for Android
In-Reply-To: <BANLkTin9VMKifEsc5ApuQPkPYLkMnKZ1nQ@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
From: Dave Crocker <dcrocker@bbiw.net>
Date: Thu, 12 May 2011 11:55:20 -0700
To: Nico Williams <nico@cryptonector.com>, Dave Crocker <dhc@dcrocker.net>
Message-ID: <a589c93e-7eb3-4a9e-995f-bdae3b15305b@email.android.com>
X-Greylist: Sender succeeded SMTP AUTH, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.0 (sbh17.songbird.com [72.52.113.17]); Thu, 12 May 2011 11:55:28 -0700 (PDT)
Cc: Pete Resnick <presnick@qualcomm.com>, Apps Discuss <apps-discuss@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [apps-discuss] Applicability Statements
X-BeenThere: apps-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: General discussion of application-layer protocols <apps-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/apps-discuss>
List-Post: <mailto:apps-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 12 May 2011 18:55:30 -0000

Nico Williams <nico@cryptonector.com> wrote:

>On Thu, May 12, 2011 at 1:42 PM, Dave Crocker <dhc@dcrocker.net> wrote:
>> while it might be quibbling about versions, AS docs HAVE been tried,
> The community never got comfonrtable with their purpose or form.
>
>Out of curiosity, if nothing else, can you point me an some examples?

google ietf applicability statement

d/

d/
--
Dave Crocker
bbiw.net

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email