Re: [apps-discuss] We have no lambs

Peter Saint-Andre <stpeter@stpeter.im> Thu, 12 May 2011 21:33 UTC

Return-Path: <stpeter@stpeter.im>
X-Original-To: apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 29E02E07DD for <apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 12 May 2011 14:33:45 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.000, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id RMwmgWJlu1-L for <apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 12 May 2011 14:33:43 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from stpeter.im (mailhost.stpeter.im [207.210.219.225]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D68C7E07AA for <apps-discuss@ietf.org>; Thu, 12 May 2011 14:33:42 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from leavealone.cisco.com (72-163-0-129.cisco.com [72.163.0.129]) (Authenticated sender: stpeter) by stpeter.im (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 51CD2400A6; Thu, 12 May 2011 15:33:41 -0600 (MDT)
Message-ID: <4DCC5232.7050004@stpeter.im>
Date: Thu, 12 May 2011 15:33:38 -0600
From: Peter Saint-Andre <stpeter@stpeter.im>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.5; en-US; rv:1.9.2.17) Gecko/20110414 Thunderbird/3.1.10
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Pete Resnick <presnick@qualcomm.com>
References: <4DCAC1CB.3050905@qualcomm.com> <6.2.5.6.2.20110511115259.051cd3f8@resistor.net> <4DCAF61F.10000@qualcomm.com> <6.2.5.6.2.20110511141027.032dd408@resistor.net> <BANLkTimsunzpH1afh8WY54nSk6z2Hw2siA@mail.gmail.com> <4DCC4FD6.4040205@qualcomm.com>
In-Reply-To: <4DCC4FD6.4040205@qualcomm.com>
X-Enigmail-Version: 1.1.1
OpenPGP: url=http://www.saint-andre.com/me/stpeter.asc
Content-Type: multipart/signed; protocol="application/pkcs7-signature"; micalg="sha1"; boundary="------------ms020102020305010100090703"
Cc: Barry Leiba <barryleiba@computer.org>, Apps Discuss <apps-discuss@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [apps-discuss] We have no lambs
X-BeenThere: apps-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: General discussion of application-layer protocols <apps-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/apps-discuss>
List-Post: <mailto:apps-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 12 May 2011 21:33:45 -0000

On 5/12/11 3:23 PM, Pete Resnick wrote:

> where the people in "leadership" are just other passengers
> on the bus, not kings, to whom one can say, "You're wrong, and here's
> why, and that makes you, Mr./Ms. Leader, in the 'rough' part of the
> rough consensus"; and where the participants in the IETF are the ones
> who take responsibility for the documents being of good quality, not the
> leadership.

Yep. And I mentally replace "the leadership" with "those individuals who
are currently serving, temporarily and at the pleasure of the community,
in leadership roles"...

Peter

-- 
Peter Saint-Andre
https://stpeter.im/