IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [apps-discuss] Applicability Statements

Nico Williams <nico@cryptonector.com> Thu, 12 May 2011 19:05 UTC

Return-Path: <nico@cryptonector.com>
X-Original-To: apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 34E1AE0758 for <apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 12 May 2011 12:05:41 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.377
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.377 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.400, BAYES_00=-2.599, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id FXv0wDOrQZiA for <apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 12 May 2011 12:05:40 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from homiemail-a25.g.dreamhost.com (caiajhbdccah.dreamhost.com [208.97.132.207]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9EBF7E0718 for <apps-discuss@ietf.org>; Thu, 12 May 2011 12:05:40 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from homiemail-a25.g.dreamhost.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by homiemail-a25.g.dreamhost.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E429D678062 for <apps-discuss@ietf.org>; Thu, 12 May 2011 12:05:36 -0700 (PDT)
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=cryptonector.com; h=mime-version :in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; q=dns; s= cryptonector.com; b=EoKKj0n9hHlhxhVyIEEinEl7VG7Fez1f0mm3PifYNvfz uttU4IB2mo1FBj2NQVIlALh1aksiEulmrRyLQ8ZpF92WDsl8TjvFPxgZdjBx+/Tk q28mq1Ca05RN28LjXgcgPybWwVaUljC1m/Pneo8gzFWOjEVNOh80Gf/COknPFE0=
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=cryptonector.com; h= mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from :to:cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; s= cryptonector.com; bh=FwCIUD58YEvti2F0mQhAEZIDudM=; b=kWT3bHS4PSy lgRIyuZcRbwtamnXC29GS/SBDZq+5PkdELMmKGOOsnMA0iu3E9p6GxapdrwOyT3x f5wKjE1ixuK3fKJYJHUrFJS0ZwfI40dVATK7mC0K1pZtEVibuVVyHY4rgrP2b4yH sTR1SeaN9ULQbAk6VUbJ9MXklw3q0+PM=
Received: from mail-vw0-f44.google.com (mail-vw0-f44.google.com [209.85.212.44]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: nico@cryptonector.com) by homiemail-a25.g.dreamhost.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 0AAD7678069 for <apps-discuss@ietf.org>; Thu, 12 May 2011 12:05:32 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by vws12 with SMTP id 12so1623129vws.31 for <apps-discuss@ietf.org>; Thu, 12 May 2011 12:05:32 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.52.175.199 with SMTP id cc7mr785162vdc.197.1305227132453; Thu, 12 May 2011 12:05:32 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.52.155.4 with HTTP; Thu, 12 May 2011 12:05:32 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <a589c93e-7eb3-4a9e-995f-bdae3b15305b@email.android.com>
References: <4DCAC1CB.3050905@qualcomm.com> <4DCC03FD.3070608@dcrocker.net> <BANLkTikU79k4iR+rSYXKsXKzhW1w-EKKbg@mail.gmail.com> <4DCC20AF.7060206@qualcomm.com> <afc07fa3-8a24-4730-8bd9-dc56447e160d@email.android.com> <BANLkTin9VMKifEsc5ApuQPkPYLkMnKZ1nQ@mail.gmail.com> <a589c93e-7eb3-4a9e-995f-bdae3b15305b@email.android.com>
Date: Thu, 12 May 2011 14:05:32 -0500
Message-ID: <BANLkTikNk5vtotewCTGZA_zLkj99ZUTKTQ@mail.gmail.com>
From: Nico Williams <nico@cryptonector.com>
To: Dave Crocker <dcrocker@bbiw.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Cc: Pete Resnick <presnick@qualcomm.com>, Apps Discuss <apps-discuss@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [apps-discuss] Applicability Statements
X-BeenThere: apps-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: General discussion of application-layer protocols <apps-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/apps-discuss>
List-Post: <mailto:apps-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 12 May 2011 19:05:41 -0000

On Thu, May 12, 2011 at 1:55 PM, Dave Crocker <dcrocker@bbiw.net> wrote:
> Nico Williams <nico@cryptonector.com> wrote:
>
>>On Thu, May 12, 2011 at 1:42 PM, Dave Crocker <dhc@dcrocker.net> wrote:
>>> while it might be quibbling about versions, AS docs HAVE been tried,
>> The community never got comfonrtable with their purpose or form.
>>
>>Out of curiosity, if nothing else, can you point me an some examples?
>
> google ietf applicability statement

Actually, this is better: ietf "applicability statement" "Intended
status: standards".

Also: ietf "applicability statement" "category: standards"

So there are standards-track ASes, and there have been I-Ds with
intended status of standards track and with "applicability statement"
in the title.

How has this "experiment" failed then?

Nico
--

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email