Re: [arch-d] IAB Statement on Encryption and Mandatory Client-side Scanning of Content
S Moonesamy <sm+ietf@elandsys.com> Mon, 18 December 2023 16:11 UTC
Return-Path: <sm@elandsys.com>
X-Original-To: architecture-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: architecture-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A86E9C14F5E2; Mon, 18 Dec 2023 08:11:01 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.704
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.704 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_INVALID=0.1, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=fail (1024-bit key) reason="fail (message has been altered)" header.d=elandsys.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 0Cra-MDV9wGM; Mon, 18 Dec 2023 08:10:57 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mx.ipv6.elandsys.com (mx.ipv6.elandsys.com [IPv6:2001:470:f329:1::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A418CC14F5EF; Mon, 18 Dec 2023 08:10:57 -0800 (PST)
Received: from DESKTOP-K6V9C2L.elandsys.com ([102.117.81.169]) (authenticated bits=0) by mx.elandsys.com (8.15.2/8.14.5) with ESMTPSA id 3BIGAKoD001342 (version=TLSv1 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Mon, 18 Dec 2023 08:10:53 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=elandsys.com; s=mail; t=1702915855; x=1703002255; i=@elandsys.com; bh=6ByPS66UvO8qoV6zbJjMTp+lguzBH5cg8a0Skdak2s0=; h=Date:To:From:Subject:In-Reply-To:References; b=M1kbg43WbkGNb8L2vEGhNMfjEc5NozW3/toBwGyFhuwHoqZNz0SgqUsGGW8YtZluq wJ0WeLBYldvNI5eEzFSShdlOA1+tZskztoNb3Q2LGxLSNuUkQEHFf3EHzNc5eIPIr+ hFL4uwYRlI03bT8AfQMXSDIm8YOwacX86nNT39D4=
Message-Id: <6.2.5.6.2.20231218064540.0a3e7ce0@elandnews.com>
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 6.2.5.6
Date: Mon, 18 Dec 2023 08:09:44 -0800
To: Mallory Knodel <mknodel=40cdt.org@dmarc.ietf.org>, architecture-discuss@ietf.org
From: S Moonesamy <sm+ietf@elandsys.com>
In-Reply-To: <0ce2f14c-0247-4aec-a6ce-8e6607ef8f32@cdt.org>
References: <170266952162.33107.14325064798861197261@ietfa.amsl.com> <6.2.5.6.2.20231216110256.18d0acd0@elandnews.com> <CWXP265MB5153610FBB98A7B06AF81040C290A@CWXP265MB5153.GBRP265.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM> <CAKr6gn2Hf4N+DgKHKyO+i3T3OJyYRBJhH1AdQf-uXZ0xKmJ4Eg@mail.gmail.com> <CWXP265MB515381523714FF99524410CFC290A@CWXP265MB5153.GBRP265.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM> <0ce2f14c-0247-4aec-a6ce-8e6607ef8f32@cdt.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/architecture-discuss/s0M-ClH5z01VReuvlgSckfcBmNA>
Subject: Re: [arch-d] IAB Statement on Encryption and Mandatory Client-side Scanning of Content
X-BeenThere: architecture-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: open discussion forum for long/wide-range architectural issues <architecture-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/architecture-discuss>, <mailto:architecture-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/architecture-discuss/>
List-Post: <mailto:architecture-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:architecture-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/architecture-discuss>, <mailto:architecture-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 18 Dec 2023 16:11:01 -0000
Hi Mallory, At 04:13 AM 18-12-2023, Mallory Knodel wrote: >Just to reframe the discussion: In the statement there are two basic >arguments made on whether technical solutions can achieve balance: > > * Can we narrow scope by implementation? No, not without wider > impacts on the open source software ecosystem built upon the > internet's architecture that enables permissionless innovation. Would any of the proposed laws have a more significant impact on "social media"? The term "the internet's architecture" in the above is ambiguous. Could you please explain what you mean by that? Regards, S. Moonesamy
- Re: [arch-d] IAB Statement on Encryption and Mand… S Moonesamy
- Re: [arch-d] IAB Statement on Encryption and Mand… Brian E Carpenter
- Re: [arch-d] IAB Statement on Encryption and Mand… S Moonesamy
- Re: [arch-d] IAB Statement on Encryption and Mand… S Moonesamy
- Re: [arch-d] IAB Statement on Encryption and Mand… George Michaelson
- Re: [arch-d] IAB Statement on Encryption and Mand… Brian E Carpenter
- Re: [arch-d] IAB Statement on Encryption and Mand… Vittorio Bertola
- Re: [arch-d] IAB Statement on Encryption and Mand… Christian Huitema
- Re: [arch-d] IAB Statement on Encryption and Mand… Eric Rescorla
- Re: [arch-d] IAB Statement on Encryption and Mand… Andrew Campling
- Re: [arch-d] IAB Statement on Encryption and Mand… Andrew Campling
- Re: [arch-d] IAB Statement on Encryption and Mand… S Moonesamy
- Re: [arch-d] IAB Statement on Encryption and Mand… Brian E Carpenter
- Re: [arch-d] IAB Statement on Encryption and Mand… Wes Hardaker
- Re: [arch-d] IAB Statement on Encryption and Mand… Hesham ElBakoury
- Re: [arch-d] IAB Statement on Encryption and Mand… S Moonesamy
- Re: [arch-d] IAB Statement on Encryption and Mand… S Moonesamy
- Re: [arch-d] IAB Statement on Encryption and Mand… Eliot Lear
- Re: [arch-d] IAB Statement on Encryption and Mand… Eric Rescorla
- [arch-d] Off topic [was: IAB Statement on Encrypt… Brian E Carpenter
- Re: [arch-d] IAB Statement on Encryption and Mand… Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: [arch-d] IAB Statement on Encryption and Mand… Eric Rescorla
- Re: [arch-d] IAB Statement on Encryption and Mand… Arnaud Taddei
- Re: [arch-d] Off topic [was: IAB Statement on Enc… Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: [arch-d] IAB Statement on Encryption and Mand… Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: [arch-d] [EXTERNAL] Re: IAB Statement on Encr… Tommy Jensen
- Re: [arch-d] Off topic [was: IAB Statement on Enc… Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: [arch-d] IAB Statement on Encryption and Mand… Eric Rescorla
- Re: [arch-d] IAB Statement on Encryption and Mand… Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: [arch-d] IAB Statement on Encryption and Mand… Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: [arch-d] IAB Statement on Encryption and Mand… Mallory Knodel
- Re: [arch-d] IAB Statement on Encryption and Mand… Mallory Knodel
- Re: [arch-d] IAB Statement on Encryption and Mand… Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: [arch-d] IAB Statement on Encryption and Mand… Mallory Knodel
- Re: [arch-d] IAB Statement on Encryption and Mand… Adrian Farrel
- Re: [arch-d] IAB Statement on Encryption and Mand… Mallory Knodel
- Re: [arch-d] Off topic [was: IAB Statement on Enc… Hesham ElBakoury
- Re: [arch-d] Off topic [was: IAB Statement on Enc… Brian E Carpenter
- Re: [arch-d] IAB Statement on Encryption and Mand… Vittorio Bertola
- Re: [arch-d] IAB Statement on Encryption and Mand… John Levine
- Re: [arch-d] IAB Statement on Encryption and Mand… Mirja Kuehlewind (IETF)
- Re: [arch-d] [IAB] IAB Statement on Encryption an… Mirja Kuehlewind (IETF)